AMC to Appendix S, S25.10(a) Interior Doors on Non-Commercially
Operated Aeroplanes
ED
Decision 2017/015/R
(1) The
following provides acceptable means to ensure that a door is open before
entering any of the taxiing, take-off, and landing phase, as required by S25.10(a)(1):
(a) The door should be
conspicuously placarded on both sides to be in the safe (i.e. open and
secured) position during taxiing, take-off, and landing;
(b) The operation of
the door and the requirement that the door be secured open for taxiing,
take-off, and landing must be the subject of a passenger briefing, and the
requirement for this briefing must be part of the AFM; for the purpose of this
briefing, a description of the operation of the internal door should be made
available to the flight crew; and
(c) There should be a
means to signal to the flight crew in a timely manner if the door is not open
and secured in a safe position before entering any of the taxiing, take-off,
or landing phases. The indication should be triggered during the descent
phase, early enough to enable the flight crew to take appropriate action
before entering the approach phase, unless the aeroplane is required to have
at least one cabin crew member on board. Appropriate procedures for crew
action should be established.
(2) The following
provides acceptable means to ensure that the door remains open during taxiing,
take-off, and landing, and especially during and after a crash landing, as
required by S25.10(a)(2):
(a) Dual means should
be provided to secure the door in the open position for taxiing, take-off, and
landing. Each of those dual means should be capable of reacting to the inertia
loads specified in CS 25.561; and
(b) The indication to
the flight crew mentioned in the above condition (1)(c) should be triggered
without delay and remain active whenever the door is not in the safe position
during any of the taxiing, take-off, and landing flight phases. Appropriate
procedures for crew action should be established.
(3) Regarding the
indication mentioned in the above paragraphs (1)(c) and (2)(b), if several
interior doors are installed, it might not be necessary to provide a distinct
indication for each door on the flight deck. Door position indication in the
cockpit may be achieved by means of a single visual indication serving all
interior doors installed in the aeroplane, provided that at least one of the
following two conditions is met:
(a) The number and
location of the interior doors is such that quick identification of the
incorrectly positioned door can be made by cabin occupants. A cabin layout
which may be accepted as meeting this condition may be one in which all
interior doors can be easily viewed during a direct walk from the front to the
rear of the cabin.
(b) There is a
simultaneous indication provided to a required cabin crew member which allows
easy identification of the interior door in the incorrect position. An
associated procedure for coordination between the flight and cabin crew should
be included in the AFM.
(4) The following
provides acceptable means to comply with the requirement S25.10(a)(3):
(a) In case the door is
operated (opening, closing and/or latching) manually: the door should be
easily operable from both sides, and if a latch is installed to restrain the
door in the closed position, the door should be capable of being unlatched
from both sides without the aid of any tool and without the need of any item
(it is not acceptable to require the use of even common items such as coins,
credit cards, pens, etc.);
b) In case the door is
operated (opening, closing and/or latching) electrically: there should be a
manual override that satisfies the above condition (4)(a), unless the
electrical opening and retention in the open and secured position continues to
function following complete loss of normal electrical power, and it is
demonstrated that following any probable electrical failure, the door defaults
to the fully open and secured position;
(c) The door should be
frangible (or equivalent, e.g. it has a removable panel) in both directions.
An assessment should be made of the moveable cabin features adjacent to the
door in order to ensure that sufficient clearance on each side of the door,
during all phases of flight, is assured by design such that the frangibility
feature(s) will work as intended. Alternatively, it may be shown that,
irrespective of the positioning of moveable cabin features, the overall
frangibility objective is still achieved, e.g. by reaching through a reduced
opening to easily move the feature before finishing the actions needed to
provide the full opening intended. The frangibility should be demonstrated by
test using a 5th percentile female, and the resulting aperture should be
demonstrated to be large enough for a 95th percentile male to escape. The case
of probable jamming in a non-fully closed position should be considered;
(d) As an alternative
to the above mentioned frangibility feature, it may be demonstrated, for
example with double sliding doors, that following any probable failure or
jamming of the door, a sufficient opening is still ensured that allows for
passing through the doorway; ’sufficient opening’ would mean, in the case of a
sliding door, an opening from floor to ceiling consistent with the minimum
required width of aisle as prescribed by CS 25.815 for a passenger
seating capacity equal to the maximum expected number of passengers that would
need to evacuate through the passenger egress path crossed by the door.
(e) The pre-flight
passenger briefing (as mentioned in condition (1)(b)) should contain
instructions on how to restore a sufficient opening for evacuation
(frangibility feature or alternative means) in case of failure or jamming of
the door.
For the definition of ‘probable failure or jamming of the door’, refer
to the definition of ‘Probable Failure Conditions’ in AMC 25.1309.
[Amdt
25/19]
Loading collections...