What should a pilot of an identified IFR flight outside controlled airspace be informed about when observed on a conflicting path with another aircraft?

The pilot should, as far as practicable, be informed as to the need for collision avoidance action to be initiated, and if so requested by the pilot or if the situation warrants, a course of avoiding action should be suggested. The pilot should also be notified when the conflict no longer exists.

When must a pilot of an identified IFR flight outside controlled airspace be notified that a conflict with another aircraft no longer exists?

The pilot should be notified when the conflict no longer exists, as far as practicable.

Which personnel are authorized to determine that a situation warrants suggesting an avoiding action to an IFR flight on a conflicting path outside controlled airspace?

The air traffic controller, the FIS officer, or the AFIS officer, in their opinion, may determine that the situation warrants suggesting a course of avoiding action.

Does the guidance in GM1 SERA.7002(a)(1) apply to identified IFR flights operating inside controlled airspace?

No, the guidance specifically applies to an identified IFR flight operating outside controlled airspace.

GM1 SERA.7002(a)(1) Collision hazard information when ATS based on surveillance are provided

Q: Under what circumstances should an air traffic controller suggest a course of avoiding action to an identified IFR flight on a conflicting path outside controlled airspace?

A course of avoiding action should be suggested if requested by the pilot or if, in the opinion of the air traffic controller, the FIS officer or the AFIS officer, the situation warrants it.

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

GM1 SERA.7002(a)(1) Collision hazard information when ATS based on surveillance are provided

ED Decision 2020/007/R

INFORMATION REGARDING TRAFFIC ON CONFLICTING PATH OUTSIDE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE

When an identified IFR flight operating outside controlled airspace is observed to be on a conflicting path with another aircraft, the pilot should, as far as practicable:

(a) be informed as to the need for collision avoidance action to be initiated, and if so requested by the pilot or if, in the opinion of the air traffic controller, the FIS officer or the AFIS officer, the situation warrants, a course of avoiding action should be suggested; and

(b) be notified when the conflict no longer exists.

Details

Source-Title: GM1 SERA.7002(a)(1) Collision hazard information when ATS based on surveillance are provided View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-10338 Compare versions

Domain: Air operations, Air traffic management/Air navigation services

Activitytype: Air traffic control services (ATC), Air operations

Applicabilitydate: 27 January, 2022

Entryintoforcedate: 3 July, 2020

Icaoreference: Doc. 4444

Regulatedentity: Air traffic controller, Flight crew

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2020/007/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Annex-Section 7: Air traffic services

Typeofcontent: GM to IR (Guidance material to implementing rule)

Parentir: SERA.7002 Collision hazard information when ATS based on surveillance are provided

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR