ED Decision 2017/015/R
This paragraph provides guidelines regarding the criteria under which
an item, although constituting an obstruction that does not comply to CS
25.813(c), may be considered acceptable because per design and procedure,
there can be high confidence that the obstruction will be removed when needed
for safety (S25.20(b)(1)).
In addition to the exceptions set in Section 2 — Deployable features of
AMC 25.813(c), an item which can be deployed by a crew member or passenger
into the region defined by CS 25.813 (c)(4)(i) or into the passageway required
by CS 25.813 (c)(1), (2) or (3), but which,
when stowed, is no longer in either of these areas, is acceptable if there is
enough assurance that the item will be stowed when needed. Such assurance may
be assumed when all following conditions are met:
(1) A
position monitoring system is installed, which detects that the item is not
properly stowed, and triggers both alerts in the passenger cabin and a visual
indication to the flight crew if the item is not properly stowed before
entering any of the taxiing, take-off, approach, and landing phases.
(2) The
alerts in the cabin, required in paragraph (1), include an aural device which
sounds continuously in all areas of the passenger cabin (it should be loud
enough to clearly act as an irritant, thus assuring that occupants will stow
the obstruction, but not so loud as to distract the flight crew), as well as a
conspicuous electrically illuminated sign showing an appropriate text message
or pictogram, in the immediate proximity of the relevant emergency exit.
(3) The
alerts described in paragraph (2), are triggered without delay if the
deployable item is moved away from the safe position during any of the
taxiing, take-off, approach, and landing flight phases, or, if upon entering
these phases, the item is not stowed in the safe position. When preparing for
landing, the alerts are triggered at a point that allows ample time for a
cabin occupant to re-stow the deployable item before landing. It should be
considered that the cabin occupant needs to move within the cabin to reach the
deployable item, therefore, the alerts should be triggered during descent,
allowing enough time prior to entering the approach phase, unless the
aeroplane is required to have at least one cabin crew member on board; The
aural and visual alerts should both remain on until the obstacle is properly
stowed.
(4) The
visual indication provided to the flight crew, described in paragraph (1), is
triggered without delay if the deployable item is moved away from the safe
position during any of the taxiing, take-off, approach, and landing flight
phases, or, if upon entering these phases, the deployable item is not stowed
in the safe position. When preparing for landing, the visual indication is
triggered during the descent phase, early enough to enable the crew to take
appropriate action before entering the approach phase.
(5) The
failure to alert in the cabin or cockpit that an item is not properly stowed
is demonstrated to have an average probability per flight hour of the order of
1 x 10-3 or less.
(6) Instructions
are given to the passengers and cabin crew (if any), by means of appropriate
placards and a pre-flight briefing, that the obstacle should be stowed before
entering any of the taxiing, take-off, approach, and landing phases. The
pre-flight briefing (which could be part of a regular briefing) should
describe the position monitoring and alerting system, as well as the necessary
response by the passengers. The requirement for this briefing should be part
of the AFM.
(7) A
description of the position monitoring and alerting system is made available
to the flight crew. The AFM should also include the appropriate normal
procedure ensuring that the cabin is ready (i.e. a check that no visual
indication, as defined in paragraph (4), being present) prior to landing, and
an instruction that the crew takes all necessary actions when the visual
indication, as defined in paragraph (4), is triggered.
(8) The emergency exit provided when the obstruction in its most adverse position(s) is at least as effective as a Type IV emergency exit, unless it can be shown that following any single failure an exit at least as effective as a Type IV emergency exit can be obtained by simple and obvious means. If the obstructing item is a seat, the normal seat operating controls (e.g. track, swivel, recline etc.) may be considered as means meeting the simple and obvious requirement, provided that the controls remain visible to a person approaching the seat and are easily useable without sitting on the seat, when the seat is in any possible obstructing condition. If movement of the obstructing item to meet the above requires electrical power, it should be substantiated that the required power source(s) will remain available following an emergency landing.
[Amdt 25/19]
EASA regulations ensure in-flight obstructions are removed before takeoff/landing on large aeroplanes. Deployable items obstructing emergency exits are acceptable if a monitoring system alerts crew and passengers audibly and visually when unstowed during critical flight phases. Procedures, briefings, and emergency exit effectiveness must also be ensured.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...