AMC
25.1302 APPENDIX 1: Related regulatory material and documents
ED Decision 2007/010/R
The following is a list of requirements, acceptable means of compliance and other documents relevant to flight deck design and flight crew interfaces which may be useful when reviewing this AMC.
1.1 Related EASA Certification Specifications
Table 1.1 List of related regulations and AMCs referenced in this document:
|
CS-25 BOOK
1 Requirements |
General topic |
CS-25 BOOK
2 Acceptable Means of Compliance |
|
CS 25.785 (g) |
Seats, berths, safety belts and harnesses |
AMC 25.785 (g) |
|
CS 25.1309(c) |
Minimising flight crew errors that could create additional hazards. |
AMC 25.1309 |
|
CS 25.1523 |
Minimum flight crew and workload. |
AMC 25.1523 |
|
CS 25.1321 |
Arrangement and visibility |
|
|
CS 25.1322 |
Colours for warning, caution, or advisory lights. |
AMC 25.1322 |
|
CS 25.1329 |
Autopilot, flight director, autothrust |
AMC 25.1329 |
|
|
Electronic displays |
AMC 25-11 |
|
CS 25.1543 |
Instrument markings - general |
AMC 25.1543 |
Note: The table above does not list all requirements associated with flight deck design and human performance. This AMC does not provide guidance for requirements that already have specific design requirements, such as CS 25.777(e), which states that “Wing flap controls and other auxiliary lift device controls must be located on top of the pedestal, aft of the throttles, centrally or to the right of the pedestal centerline, and not less than 25 cm (10 inches) aft of the landing gear control.”
1.2 RESERVED
1.3 FAA Orders and Policy
— Policy Memo ANM-99-2, Guidance for Reviewing Certification Plans to Address Human Factors for Certification of Transport Airplane Flight Decks.
— Policy Memo ANM-0103, Factors to Consider When Reviewing an Applicant’s Proposed Human Factors Methods of Compliance for Flight Deck Certification.
— FAA Notice 8110.98, Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface Issues of Complex, Integrated Avionics as Part of the Technical Standard Order (TSO) Process.
1.4 Other documents
Following is a list of other documents relevant to flight deck design and flight crew interfaces that may be useful when reviewing this AMC. Some contain special constraints and limitations, however, particularly those that are not aviation specific. For example, International Standard ISO 9241-4 has much useful guidance that is not aviation specific. When using that document, applicants should consider environmental factors such as the intended operational environment, turbulence, and lighting as well as cross-side reach.
— SAE ARP 4033 (Pilot-System Integration), August 1995
— SAE ARP5289, Electronic Aeronautical Symbols
— SAE ARP-4102/7, Electronic Displays
— FAA Human Factors Team report on: The Interfaces Between Flightcrews and Modern Flight Deck Systems, 1996
— DOT/FAA/RD –93/5: Human Factors for Flight Deck Certification Personnel
— ICAO 8400/5, Procedures for Air Navigation Services ICAO Abbreviations and Codes. Fifth Edition, 1999
— ICAO Human Factors Training Manual: DOC 9683 – AN/950
— International Standards ISO 9241-4, Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)
[Amdt 25/3]
EASA CS-25 regulations for large aeroplanes provide guidance on flight deck design and flight crew interfaces. Compliance involves considering related regulations, acceptable compliance methods, FAA policies, and other relevant documents like SAE standards and ICAO manuals. Human factors and operational environment are crucial for aviation safety.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...
Join all world-wide aviation professionals who use Aviation.Bot. Create a free account to unlock the full potential of our AI-powered aviation regulations assistant.
-->