Navigate / EASA
Ask question Discover more Add to collection
GM1 ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads

ED Decision 2014/013/R

Consideration should be given to the fact that the de-icing/anti-icing pad (in common with an apron) should be subjected to a higher density of traffic and, as a result of slow-moving or stationary aircraft, to higher stresses than a runway.
Details
Source-Title: GM1 ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads View latest amendments
Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-2425 Compare versions
Domain: Aerodromes
Activitytype: Aerodrome operations, Aerodrome design, Manufacturing
Amendedby: CS Issue 1
Applicabilitydate: 7 March, 2014
Entryintoforcedate: 6 March, 2014
Icaoreference: Annex 14, Volume I
Keywords: PCN, ACN
Regulatedentity: Aerodrome operator, Aerodrome design organisation, Aerodrome equipment manufacturer
Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2014/013/R Navigate
Regulatorysubject: CS-ADR-DSN
Technicalsubjectmatter: Aprons
Typeofcontent: GM to CS (Guidance material to certification specification)
Parentir: CS ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads
Easacategory: Non-instrument runway, Non-precision approach runway, Precision approach runway Category I, Precision approach runway Category II, Precision approach runway Category III, Take-off runway
Origin: EASA
Category: EAR