Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM1 ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-2425
ED Decision 2014/013/R
found in: Aerodromes (139/2014) Part-ADR.AR Part-ADR.OR Part-ADR.OPS CS-ADR-DSN CS-HPT-DSN (Jun 2023)
From
Easy Access Rules ... (Mar 2026)
Aerodromes (139/20... (Dec 2024)
Aerodromes (139/20... (Jun 2023)
From section
To
Easy Access Rules ... (Mar 2026)
Aerodromes (139/20... (Dec 2024)
Aerodromes (139/20... (Jun 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM1 ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads ED Decision 2014/013/R Consideration should be given to the fact that the de-icing/anti-icing pad (in common with an apron) should be subjected to a higher density of traffic and, as a result of slow-moving or stationary aircraft, to higher stresses than a runway.
GM1 ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads ED Decision 2014/013/R Consideration should be given to the fact that the de-icing/anti-icing pad (in common with an apron) should be subjected to a higher density of traffic and, as a result of slow-moving or stationary aircraft, to higher stresses than a runway.
##### GM1 ADR-DSN.G.395 Strength of de-icing/anti-icing pads *ED Decision 2014/013/R* Consideration should be given to the fact that the de-icing/anti-icing pad (in common with an apron) should be subjected to a higher density of traffic and, as a result of slow-moving or stationary aircraft, to higher stresses than a runway.