AMC2 ORO.FC.231(d)(1) Evidence-based training
ED
Decision 2021/002/R
GRADING
SYSTEM — ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM
(a) An operator seeking to develop an
alternative grading system under ORO.GEN.120 should:
(1) provide quantifiable data for the
measurement of the training system performance; and
(2) demonstrate equivalence to the recommended
grading system in AMC1 ORO.FC.231(d)(1).
(b) The grading scale for each competency
should:
(1) determine the grade at which the
performance is considered:
(i) NOT COMPETENT for the conduct of line
operations. An outcome of ADDITIONAL TRAINING REQUIRED and level 2 grading
metrics should be recorded; and
(ii) COMPETENT for the conduct of line
operations; and
(2) determine for the pilot whose performance
is considered competent for the conduct of line operations:
(i) if the pilot needs more training (e.g.
tailored or additional training) to elevate their performance to the operator
specified norm;
(ii) if the pilot is at the operator specified
norm;
(iii) if the pilot is above the average (it can
be one or more grades e.g. above the average and exemplary).
(c) The operator should develop further
guidance to the above points to help the instructors determine the grade of
the pilots they assess.
Loading collections...