ED Decision 2023/007/R
DETERMINATION OF RVR OR VIS FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — AEROPLANES
(a) The RVR or VIS for straight-in instrument approach operations should not be less than the greatest of the following:
(1) the minimum RVR or VIS for the type of runway used according to Table 7; or
(2) the minimum RVR determined according to the MDH or DH and class of lighting facility according to Table 8; or
(3) the minimum RVR according to the visual and non-visual aids and on-board equipment used according to Table 9.
If the value determined in (1) is a VIS, then the result is a minimum VIS. In all other cases, the result is a minimum RVR.
(b) For Category A and B aeroplanes, if the RVR or VIS determined in accordance with point (a) is greater than 1 500 m, then 1 500 m should be used.
(c) If the approach is flown with a level flight segment at or above the MDA/H, then 200 m should be added to the RVR calculated in accordance with (a) and (b) for Category A and B aeroplanes and 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes.
(d) The visual aids should comprise standard runway day markings, runway edge lights, threshold lights, runway end lights and approach lights as defined in Table 10.
Table 7
Type of runway versus minimum RVR or VIS — aeroplanes
Type of runway |
Minimum RVR or VIS (m) |
PA runway, category I |
RVR 550 |
NPA runway |
RVR 750 |
Non-instrument runway |
VIS
according to Table 1 in NCC.OP.112
|
Table 8
RVR versus DH/MDH
DH
or MDH
|
Class of lighting facility |
|||||
FALS |
IALS |
BALS |
NALS |
|||
RVR (m) |
||||||
200 |
- |
210 |
550 |
750 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
211 |
- |
240 |
550 |
800 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
241 |
- |
250 |
550 |
800 |
1 000 |
1 300 |
251 |
- |
260 |
600 |
800 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
261 |
- |
280 |
600 |
900 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
281 |
- |
300 |
650 |
900 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
301 |
- |
320 |
700 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
321 |
- |
340 |
800 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
1 500 |
341 |
- |
360 |
900 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
1 600 |
361 |
- |
380 |
1 000 |
1 300 |
1 500 |
1 700 |
381 |
- |
400 |
1 100 |
1 400 |
1 600 |
1 800 |
401 |
- |
420 |
1 200 |
1 500 |
1 700 |
1 900 |
421 |
- |
440 |
1 300 |
1 600 |
1 800 |
2 000 |
441 |
- |
460 |
1 400 |
1 700 |
1 900 |
2 100 |
461 |
- |
480 |
1 500 |
1 800 |
2 000 |
2 200 |
481 |
- |
500 |
1 500 |
1 800 |
2 100 |
2 300 |
501 |
- |
520 |
1 600 |
1 900 |
2 100 |
2 400 |
521 |
- |
540 |
1 700 |
2 000 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
541 |
- |
560 |
1 800 |
2 100 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
561 |
- |
580 |
1 900 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
581 |
- |
600 |
2 000 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
601 |
- |
620 |
2 100 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
621 |
- |
640 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
641 |
- |
660 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
661 |
and above |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
Table 9
Visual and non-visual aids and/or on-board equipment versus minimum RVR — aeroplanes
Type of approach |
Facilities |
Lowest RVR |
|
Multi-pilot operations |
Single-pilot operations |
||
3D operations
Final approach track offset £15o for category A and B aeroplanes or £5o for Category C and D aeroplanes |
runway touchdown zone lights (RTZL) and runway centre line lights (RCLL) |
No limitation |
|
without RTZL and RCLL but using HUDLS or equivalent system;
without RTZL and RCLL but using autopilot or flight director to the DH |
No limitation |
600 m |
|
No RTZL and RCLL, not using HUDLS or equivalent system or autopilot to the DH |
750 m |
800 m |
|
3D operations |
runway touchdown zone lights (RTZL) and runway centre line lights (RCLL) and Final approach track offset > 15o for Category A and B aeroplanes or Final approach track offset > 5o for Category C and D aeroplanes |
800 m |
1 000 m |
3D operations |
without RTZL and RCLL but using HUDLS or equivalent system; autopilot or flight director to the DH and Final approach track offset > 15o for Category A and B aeroplanes or Final approach track offset > 5o for Category C and D aeroplanes |
800 m |
1 000 m |
2D operations |
Final approach track offset £15o for category A and B aeroplanes or £5o for Category C and D aeroplanes |
750 m |
2D operations |
Final approach track offset > 15o for Category A and B aeroplanes |
1 000 m |
1 000 m |
|
Final approach track offset > 5o for Category C and D aeroplanes |
1 200 m |
1 200 m |
|
Table 10
Approach lighting systems — aeroplanes
Class of lighting facility |
Length, configuration and intensity of approach lights |
FALS |
CAT I lighting system (HIALS ≥720 m) distance coded centre line, barrette centre line |
IALS |
Simple approach lighting system (HIALS 420–719 m) single source, barrette |
BALS |
Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS 210–419 m) |
NALS |
Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS <210 m) or no approach lights |
(e) For night operations or for any operation where credit for visual aids is required, the lights should be on and serviceable except as provided for in Table 15.
(f) Where any visual or non-visual aid specified for the approach and assumed to be available in the determination of operating minima is unavailable, revised operating minima will need to be determined.
AMC5 NCC.OP.110 defines aerodrome operating minima for instrument approaches, specifying RVR/VIS values based on runway type, DH/MDH, lighting class, and equipment, with adjustments for level flight segments.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...