What is the minimum increase in RVR required for a Category D aeroplane when an approach is not flown using the CDFA technique, and what is the upper limit for the resulting RVR/CMV value?

For Category D aeroplanes, the RVR should be increased by 400 m, provided the resulting RVR/CMV value does not exceed 5 000 m.

For a Category B aeroplane conducting a non-precision approach without the CDFA technique, what is the required RVR increase when calculating minima under NCC.OP.111?

The applicable minimum RVR should be increased by 200 m for Category B aeroplanes, provided the resulting RVR/CMV value does not exceed 5 000 m.

What is the maximum allowable RVR/CMV value after applying the RVR increase for non-CDFA approaches?

The resulting RVR/CMV value should not exceed 5 000 m.

When calculating minima for a non-CDFA approach, what condition must be met regarding the resulting RVR/CMV value?

The resulting RVR/CMV value must not exceed 5 000 m.

AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima

Q: For approaches not flown using CDFA, how does the RVR increase differ between Category A/B and Category C/D aeroplanes?

The RVR should be increased by 200 m for Category A and B aeroplanes and by 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes.

Q: What is the recommended approach technique for approaches in general, and what flexibility is permitted?

Whenever practical, approaches should be flown as stabilised approaches (SAps). Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway.

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima – general

ED Decision 2013/021/R

GENERAL

(a) The aerodrome operating minima should not be lower than the values given in NCC.OP.111 or AMC3 NCC.OP.110(c).

(b) Whenever practical approaches should be flown as stabilised approaches (SAps). Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway.

(c) Whenever practical, non-precision approaches should be flown using the continuous descent final approach (CDFA) technique. Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway.

(d) For approaches not flown using the CDFA technique: when calculating the minima in accordance with NCC.OP.111, the applicable minimum runway visual range (RVR) should be increased by 200 m for Category A and B aeroplanes and by 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes, provided the resulting RVR/converted meteorological visibility (CMV) value does not exceed 5 000 m. SAp or CDFA should be used as soon as facilities are improved to allow these techniques.

Details

Source-Title: AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima - general View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-13494 Compare versions

Domain: Air operations

Applicabilitydate: 23 August, 2013

Entryintoforcedate: 23 August, 2013

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2013/021/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Part-NCC

Typeofcontent: AMC to IR (Acceptable means of compliance to implementing rule)

Parentir: NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima -- general

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR