AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima - general

• ED Decision 2013/021/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)

AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima – general ED Decision 2013/021/R GENERAL (a) The aerodrome operating minima should not be lower than the values given in [NCC.OP.111](https://dxweb.easa.europa.eu/dx4/Topics/ops_annexVI089.docx) or [AMC3 NCC.OP.110(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm927679694). (b) Whenever practical approaches should be flown as stabilised approaches (SAps). Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway. (c) Whenever practical, non-precision approaches should be flown using the continuous descent final approach (CDFA) technique. Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway. (d) For approaches not flown using the CDFA technique: when calculating the minima in accordance with [NCC.OP.111](https://dxweb.easa.europa.eu/dx4/Topics/ops_annexVI089.docx), the applicable minimum runway visual range (RVR) should be increased by 200 m for Category A and B aeroplanes and by 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes, provided the resulting RVR/converted meteorological visibility (CMV) value does not exceed 5 000 m. SAp or CDFA should be used as soon as facilities are improved to allow these techniques. AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima – general ED Decision 2013/021/R GENERAL (a) The aerodrome operating minima should not be lower than the values given in [NCC.OP.111](https://dxweb.easa.europa.eu/dx4/Topics/ops_annexVI089.docx) or [AMC3 NCC.OP.110(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm318087302). (b) Whenever practical approaches should be flown as stabilised approaches (SAps). Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway. (c) Whenever practical, non-precision approaches should be flown using the continuous descent final approach (CDFA) technique. Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway. (d) For approaches not flown using the CDFA technique: when calculating the minima in accordance with [NCC.OP.111](https://dxweb.easa.europa.eu/dx4/Topics/ops_annexVI089.docx), the applicable minimum runway visual range (RVR) should be increased by 200 m for Category A and B aeroplanes and by 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes, provided the resulting RVR/converted meteorological visibility (CMV) value does not exceed 5 000 m. SAp or CDFA should be used as soon as facilities are improved to allow these techniques. ##### AMC2 NCC.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima – general *ED Decision 2013/021/R* **GENERAL** (a) The aerodrome operating minima should not be lower than the values given in [NCC.OP.111](https://dxweb.easa.europa.eu/dx4/Topics/ops_annexVI089.docx) or [AMC3 NCC.OP.110(c)](#_DxCrossRefBm523089294). (b) Whenever practical approaches should be flown as stabilised approaches (SAps). Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway. (c) Whenever practical, non-precision approaches should be flown using the continuous descent final approach (CDFA) technique. Different procedures may be used for a particular approach to a particular runway. (d) For approaches not flown using the CDFA technique: when calculating the minima in accordance with [NCC.OP.111](https://dxweb.easa.europa.eu/dx4/Topics/ops_annexVI089.docx), the applicable minimum runway visual range (RVR) should be increased by 200 m for Category A and B aeroplanes and by 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes, provided the resulting RVR/converted meteorological visibility (CMV) value does not exceed 5 000 m. SAp or CDFA should be used as soon as facilities are improved to allow these techniques.