AMC1 CAT.POL.A.320 En-route - single-engined aeroplanes

Q: What does CAT.POL.A.320 require for an operator that is not approved for SET-IMC and does not use a risk period, in the event of an engine failure?

The aeroplane should be capable of reaching a point from which a safe forced landing can be made. Unless otherwise specified by the competent authority, this point should be 1 000 ft above the intended landing area.

Q: For an operator not approved for SET-IMC and not using a risk period, what must be ensured in the event of an engine failure according to CAT.POL.A.320?

That the aeroplane should be capable of reaching a point from which a safe forced landing can be made.

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

AMC1 CAT.POL.A.320 En-route – single-engined aeroplanes

ED Decision 2017/004/R

ENGINE FAILURE

CAT.POL.A.320requires the operator not approved by the competent authority in accordance with Subpart L (SET-IMC) of Annex V (Part-SPA) to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012, and not making use of a risk period, to ensure that in the event of an engine failure, the aeroplane should be capable of reaching a point from which a safe forced landing can be made. Unless otherwise specified by the competent authority, this point should be 1 000 ft above the intended landing area.

Details

Source-Title: AMC1 CAT.POL.A.320 En-route - single-engined aeroplanes View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-12622 Compare versions

Domain: Air operations

Applicabilitydate: 10 March, 2017

Entryintoforcedate: 10 March, 2017

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2017/004/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Part-CAT

Typeofcontent: AMC to IR (Acceptable means of compliance to implementing rule)

Parentir: CAT.POL.A.320 En-route - single-engined aeroplanes

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR