What is the role of information collected pursuant to ARO.RAMP.110 in determining suspected non-compliance?

Any relevant information collected pursuant to ARO.RAMP.110 should be taken into account.

AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(b) General

Q: What factors should be considered when determining whether an aircraft is suspected of not being compliant with applicable requirements?

The following should be taken into account: (a) information regarding poor maintenance of, or obvious damage or defects to an aircraft; (b) reports that an aircraft has performed abnormal manoeuvres that give rise to serious safety concerns in the airspace of a Member State; (c) a previous ramp inspection that has revealed deficiencies indicating that the aircraft does not comply with the applicable requirements and where the competent authority suspects that these deficiencies have not been corrected; (d) lists, referred to in ARO.RAMP.105, indicating that the operator or the State of the operator has been suspected of non-compliance; (e) evidence that the State in which an aircraft is registered is not exercising proper safety oversight; (f) concerns about the operator of the aircraft that have arisen from occurrence reporting information and non-compliance recorded in a ramp inspection report on any other aircraft used by that operator; (g) information received from EASA Third-Country Operator (TCO) monitoring activities; or (h) any relevant information collected pursuant to ARO.RAMP.110.

Q: Which AMC and ED decision is associated with the general guidance on suspected non-compliance of aircraft?

AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(b) General, ED Decision 2019/007/R.

Q: What type of information about an aircraft's maintenance or condition could lead to it being suspected of non-compliance?

Information regarding poor maintenance of, or obvious damage or defects to an aircraft.

Q: How can reports of abnormal manoeuvres affect the determination of suspected non-compliance?

Reports that an aircraft has performed abnormal manoeuvres that give rise to serious safety concerns in the airspace of a Member State should be taken into account.

Q: What role does a previous ramp inspection play in suspecting an aircraft of non-compliance?

A previous ramp inspection that has revealed deficiencies indicating that the aircraft does not comply with the applicable requirements and where the competent authority suspects that these deficiencies have not been corrected should be taken into account.

Q: Which lists, and under which regulation, indicate that an operator or the State of the operator has been suspected of non-compliance?

Lists referred to in ARO.RAMP.105, indicating that the operator or the State of the operator has been suspected of non-compliance.

Q: What evidence regarding the State of registry could lead to suspecting an aircraft of non-compliance?

Evidence that the State in which an aircraft is registered is not exercising proper safety oversight.

Q: How can concerns about an operator arise from occurrence reporting and ramp inspection reports on other aircraft?

Concerns about the operator of the aircraft that have arisen from occurrence reporting information and non-compliance recorded in a ramp inspection report on any other aircraft used by that operator should be taken into account.

Q: What information from EASA TCO monitoring activities is relevant for suspecting an aircraft of non-compliance?

Information received from EASA Third-Country Operator (TCO) monitoring activities.

Navigate / EASA

Ask question Discover more Add to collection

AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(b) General

ED Decision 2019/007/R

SUSPECTED AIRCRAFT

In determining whether an aircraft is suspected of not being compliant with the applicable requirements, the following should be taken into account:

(a) information regarding poor maintenance of, or obvious damage or defects to an aircraft;

(b) reports that an aircraft has performed abnormal manoeuvres that give rise to serious safety concerns in the airspace of a Member State;

(c) a previous ramp inspection that has revealed deficiencies indicating that the aircraft does not comply with the applicable requirements and where the competent authority suspects that these deficiencies have not been corrected;

(d) lists, referred to in ARO.RAMP.105, indicating that the operator or the State of the operator has been suspected of non-compliance;

(e) evidence that the State in which an aircraft is registered is not exercising proper safety oversight;

(f) concerns about the operator of the aircraft that have arisen from occurrence reporting information and non-compliance recorded in a ramp inspection report on any other aircraft used by that operator;

(g) information received from EASA Third-Country Operator (TCO) monitoring activities; or

(h) any relevant information collected pursuant to ARO.RAMP.110.

Details

Source-Title: AMC1 ARO.RAMP.100(b) General View latest amendments

Erulesid: ERULES-1963177438-11659 Compare versions

Domain: Air operations

Applicabilitydate: 1 September, 2019

Entryintoforcedate: 28 February, 2019

Regulatorysource: ED Decision 2019/007/R Navigate

Regulatorysubject: Part-ARO

Typeofcontent: AMC to IR (Acceptable means of compliance to implementing rule)

Parentir: ARO.RAMP.100 General

Origin: EASA

Category: EAR