Navigate / EASA
AMC6 CAT.OP.MPA.110 Aerodrome operating minima

ED Decision 2022/012/R

DETERMINATION OF RVR OR VIS FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — HELICOPTERS

The RVR/VIS minima for Type A instrument approach and Type B CAT I instrument approach operations should be determined as follows:

(a) For IFR operations, the RVR or VIS should not be less than the greatest of:

(1) the minimum RVR or VIS for the type of runway/FATO used according to Table 12;

(2) the minimum RVR determined according to the MDH or DH and class of lighting facility according to Table 13; or

(3) for PinS operations with instructions to ‘proceed visually’, the distance between the MAPt of the PinS and the FATO or its approach light system.

If the value determined in (1) is a VIS, then the result is a minimum VIS. In all other cases, the result is a minimum RVR.

(b) For PinS operations with instructions to ‘proceed VFR’, the VIS should be compatible with visual flight rules.

(c) For Type A instrument approaches where the MAPt is within ½ NM of the landing threshold, the approach minima specified for FALS may be used regardless of the length of the approach lights available. However, FATO/runway edge lights, threshold lights, end lights and FATO/runway markings are still required.

(d) An RVR of less than 800 m should not be used except when using a suitable autopilot coupled to an ILS, an MLS, a GLS or LPV, in which case normal minima apply.

(e) For night operations, ground lights should be available to illuminate the FATO/runway and any obstacles.

(f) The visual aids should comprise standard runway day markings, runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway end lights and approach lights as specified in Table 14.

(g) For night operations or for any operation where credit for runway and approach lights as defined in Table 14 is required, the lights should be on and serviceable except as defined in Table 17.

Table 12

Type of runway/FATO versus minimum RVR — helicopters

Type of runway/FATO

Minimum RVR or VIS

PA runway, category I

NPA runway

Non-instrument runway

RVR 550 m

Instrument FATO

FATO

RVR 550 m

RVR/VIS 800 m



Table 13

Onshore helicopter instrument approach minima

DH/MDH (ft)

Facilities versus RVR (m)

FALS

IALS

BALS

NALS

200

550

600

700

1 000

201–249

550

650

750

1 000

250–299

600*

700*

800

1 000

300 and above

750*

800

900

1 000

* Minima on 2D approach operations should be no lower than 800 m.



Table 14

Approach lighting systems — helicopters

Class of lighting facility

Length, configuration and intensity of approach lights

FALS

CAT I lighting system (HIALS ≥ 720 m) distance coded centre line, barrette centre line

IALS

Simple approach lighting system (HIALS 420–719 m) single source, barrette

BALS

Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS 210–419 m)

NALS

Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS < 210 m) or no approach lights