AMC4 SPO.OP.110 Aerodrome operating minima — aeroplanes and
helicopters
ED Decision 2022/014/R
DETERMINATION OF THE DH/MDH FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — AEROPLANES
(a) The decision height (DH) to be used for a 3D approach operation or a 2D approach operation flown using the continuous descent final approach (CDFA) technique should not be lower than the highest of:
(1) the obstacle clearance height (OCH) for the category of aircraft;
(2) the published approach procedure DH or minimum descent height (MDH) where applicable;
(3) the system minima specified in Table 4;
(4) the minimum DH permitted for the runway specified in Table 5; or
(5) the minimum DH specified in the AFM or equivalent document, if stated.
(b) The MDH for a 2D approach operation flown not using CDFA technique should not be lower than the highest of:
(1) the OCH for the category of aircraft;
(2) the published approach procedure MDH where applicable;
(3) the system minimum specified in Table 4;
(4) the lowest MDH permitted for the runway specified in Table 5; or
(5) the lowest MDH specified in the AFM, if stated.
DETERMINATION OF THE DH/MDH FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — HELICOPTERS
(c) The DH or MDH should not be lower than the highest of:
(1) the OCH for
the category of aircraft;
(2) the published approach procedure DH or MDH where applicable;
(3) the system minima specified in Table 4;
(4) the lowest DH or MDH permitted for the runway/FATO specified in Table 6 if applicable; or
(5) the lowest DH or MDH specified in the AFM, if stated.
Table 4
System
minima — all aircraft
|
Facility |
Lowest
DH/MDH (ft) |
|
ILS/MLS/GLS |
200 |
|
GNSS/SBAS (LPV) |
200* |
|
Precision
approach radar (PAR) |
200 |
|
GNSS/SBAS (LP) |
250 |
|
GNSS (LNAV) |
250 |
|
GNSS/Baro VNAV
(LNAV/VNAV) |
250 |
|
Helicopter PinS
approach |
250** |
|
LOC with or
without DME |
250 |
|
SRA (terminating
at ½ NM) |
250 |
|
SRA
(terminating at 1 NM) |
300 |
|
SRA
(terminating at 2 NM or more) |
350 |
|
VOR |
300 |
|
VOR/DME |
250 |
|
NDB |
350 |
|
NDB/DME |
300 |
|
VDF |
350 |
* For localiser performance with vertical guidance (LPV), a DH of 200 ft may be used only if the published final approach segment (FAS) datablock sets a vertical alert limit not exceeding 35 m. Otherwise, the DH should not be lower than 250 ft.
** For PinS approaches with instructions to ‘proceed VFR’ to an undefined or virtual destination, the DH or MDH should be with reference to the ground below the missed approach point (MAPt).
Table 5
Runway type
minima — aeroplanes
|
Runway type |
Lowest
DH/MDH (ft) |
|
Precision
approach (PA) runway, category I |
200 |
|
NPA runway |
250 |
|
Non-instrument
runway |
Circling minima as shown in Table 1 in SPO.OP.112 |
Table 6
Type of
runway/FATO versus lowest DH/MDH — helicopters
|
Type of runway/FATO |
Lowest
DH/MDH (ft) |
|
PA runway, category
I NPA runway Non-instrument
runway |
200 |
|
Instrument FATO FATO |
200 250 |
Table 6 does not apply to helicopter PinS approaches with instructions to ‘proceed VFR’.
EASA aviation regulations mandate that decision height (DH) or minimum descent height (MDH) for aircraft instrument approaches must adhere to strict minimums. These minimums consider obstacle clearance, published approach procedures, system capabilities like ILS, runway type, and aircraft flight manual limitations, ensuring safe landing operations for both aeroplanes and helicopters.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...