AMC5 CAT.OP.MPA.110 Aerodrome
operating minima
ED Decision
2023/007/R
DETERMINATION OF RVR OR VIS FOR INSTRUMENT APPROACH OPERATIONS — AEROPLANES
(a) The RVR or VIS for straight-in instrument approach operations should be not less than the greatest of:
(1) the minimum RVR or VIS for the type of runway used according to Table 8;
(2) the minimum RVR determined according to the MDH or DH and class of lighting facility according to Table 9; or
(3) the minimum RVR according to the visual and non-visual aids and on-board equipment used according to Table 10.
If the value determined in (1) is a VIS, then the result is a minimum VIS. In all other cases, the result is a minimum RVR.
(b) For Category A and B aeroplanes, if the RVR or VIS determined in accordance with (a) is greater than 1 500 m, then 1 500 m should be used.
(c) If the approach is flown with a level flight segment at or above the MDA/H, then 200 m should be added to the RVR calculated in accordance with (a) and (b) for Category A and B aeroplanes and 400 m for Category C and D aeroplanes.
Table 8
Type of
runway versus minimum RVR or VIS — aeroplanes
|
Type of runway |
Minimum RVR or VIS (m) |
|
PA runway Category I |
RVR 550 |
|
NPA runway |
RVR 750 |
|
Non-instrument runway |
VIS according to Table 15 (circling minima) |
Table 9
RVR versus DH/MDH — aeroplanes
|
DH or MDH (ft) |
Class of lighting
facility |
|||||
|
FALS |
IALS |
BALS |
NALS |
|||
|
RVR (m) |
||||||
|
200 |
- |
210 |
550 |
750 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
|
211 |
- |
240 |
550 |
800 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
|
241 |
- |
250 |
550 |
800 |
1 000 |
1 300 |
|
251 |
- |
260 |
600 |
800 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
|
261 |
- |
280 |
600 |
900 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
|
281 |
- |
300 |
650 |
900 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
|
301 |
- |
320 |
700 |
1 000 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
|
321 |
- |
340 |
800 |
1 100 |
1 300 |
1 500 |
|
341 |
- |
360 |
900 |
1 200 |
1 400 |
1 600 |
|
361 |
- |
380 |
1 000 |
1 300 |
1 500 |
1 700 |
|
381 |
- |
400 |
1 100 |
1 400 |
1 600 |
1 800 |
|
401 |
- |
420 |
1 200 |
1 500 |
1 700 |
1 900 |
|
421 |
- |
440 |
1 300 |
1 600 |
1 800 |
2 000 |
|
441 |
- |
460 |
1 400 |
1 700 |
1 900 |
2 100 |
|
461 |
- |
480 |
1 500 |
1 800 |
2 000 |
2 200 |
|
481 |
- |
500 |
1 500 |
1 800 |
2 100 |
2 300 |
|
501 |
- |
520 |
1 600 |
1 900 |
2 100 |
2 400 |
|
521 |
- |
540 |
1 700 |
2 000 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
|
541 |
- |
560 |
1 800 |
2 100 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
|
561 |
- |
580 |
1 900 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
581 |
- |
600 |
2 000 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
601 |
- |
620 |
2 100 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
621 |
- |
640 |
2 200 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
641 |
- |
660 |
2 300 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
|
and above |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
2 400 |
||
Table 10
Visual and
non-visual aids and/or on-board equipment versus minimum RVR — aeroplanes
|
Type of approach |
Facilities |
Lowest
RVR |
|
|
Multi-pilot operations |
Single-pilot operations |
||
|
3D operations Final approach track offset ≤15° for category A and B aeroplanes or ≤5° for Category C and D aeroplanes |
runway touchdown zone lights (RTZL) and runway centre line lights (RCLL) |
No limitation |
|
|
without RTZL and/or RCLL but using HUDLS or equivalent system; without RTZL and/or RCLL but using autopilot or flight director to the DH |
No limitation |
600 m |
|
|
No RTZL and/or RCLL, not using HUDLS or equivalent system or autopilot or flight director to the DH |
750 m |
800 m |
|
|
3D operations |
runway touchdown zone lights (RTZL) and runway centre line lights (RCLL) and Final approach track offset >15° for Category A and B aeroplanes or Final approach track offset > 5° for Category C and D aeroplanes |
800 m |
1 000 m |
|
without RTZL and RCLL but using HUDLS or equivalent system; autopilot or flight director to the DH and Final approach track offset > 15° for Category A and B aeroplanes or Final approach track offset > 5° for Category C and D aeroplanes |
800 m |
1 000 m |
|
|
2D operations |
Final approach track offset ≤15° for category A and B aeroplanes or ≤5° for Category C and D aeroplanes |
750 m |
800 m |
|
Final approach track offset > 15° for Category A and B aeroplanes |
1 000 m |
1 000 m |
|
|
Final approach track offset > 5° for Category C and D aeroplanes |
1 200 m |
1 200 m |
|
Table 11
Approach
lighting systems — aeroplanes
|
Class of lighting
facility |
Length, configuration
and intensity of approach lights |
|
FALS |
CAT I lighting system (HIALS ≥720 m) distance coded centre line, barrette centre line |
|
IALS |
Simple approach lighting system (HIALS 420–719 m) single source, barrette |
|
BALS |
Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS 210–419 m) |
|
NALS |
Any other approach lighting system (HIALS, MALS or ALS <210 m) or no approach lights |
(e) For night operations or for any operation where credit for visual aids is required, the lights should be on and serviceable except as provided for in Table 17.
(f) Where any visual or non-visual aid specified for the approach and assumed to be available in the determination of operating minima is unavailable, revised operating minima will need to be determined.
EASA aviation regulations dictate aerodrome operating minima for instrument approaches. Runway Visual Range (RVR) or visibility (VIS) must meet specific requirements based on runway type, lighting, and aircraft category. Higher minima apply for level flight segments and inoperative visual aids. These regulations ensure safe low-visibility landings.
* Summary by Aviation.Bot - Always consult the original document for the most accurate information.
Loading collections...