AviationBot
Navigate / EASA / Aerodromes Mar 2026 / ANNEX IV -- Operations Requirements (Part-ADR.OPS) / SUBPART A -- AERODROME DATA (ADR.OPS.A) / ADR.OPS.A.065 Reporting of the runway surface condition /

AMC1 ADR.OPS.A.065(b)', '(c) Reporting of the runway surface condition

Learn how to report runway surface conditions per AMC1 ADR.OPS.A.065(b);(c). Find significant change criteria, coverage percentages, and depth thresholds for contaminants.

Frequently Asked Questions

A change is significant whenever there is any change in the RWYCC, a change in the contaminant type, a change in reportable contaminant coverage according to Table 1, a change in contaminant depth according to Table 2, or other information (e.g., a SPECIAL AIR-REPORT of runway braking action) known to be significant.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

If the assessed coverage is 10-25%, the reported percentage should be 25%.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

For an assessed coverage of 51-75%, the reported percentage is 75%.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

For standing water, 04 (4 mm) is the minimum depth value at and above which the depth should be reported. From 3 mm and below, the runway third should be considered WET.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

For slush, depths up to and including 3 mm should be reported as 03 (3 mm).

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

The significant change threshold for wet snow is 5 mm.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

The significant change threshold for dry snow is 20 mm.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

For standing water above 4 mm, an assessed value should be reported (e.g., 6 mm). A significant change relates to the observed change from this assessed value, with a threshold of 3 mm.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

EASA Logo
AMC1 ADR.OPS.A.065(b);(c) Reporting of the runway surface condition

ED Decision 2021/003/R

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

A change in the runway surface condition used in the RCR should be considered significant whenever there is any:

(a) change in the RWYCC;

(b) change in the contaminant type;

(c) change in reportable contaminant coverage according to Table 1;

(d) change in contaminant depth according to Table 2; and

(e) other information, for example a SPECIAL AIR-REPORT of runway braking action, which according to assessment techniques used, is known to be significant.

Assessed per cent

Reported per cent

10-25

25

26-50

50

51-75

75

76-100

100

Table 1: Percentage of coverage for contaminants

Contaminant

Valid values to be reported

Significant change

STANDING WATER

04, then assessed value

3 mm

SLUSH

03, then assessed value

3 mm

WET SNOW

03, then assessed value

5 mm

DRY SNOW

03, then assessed value

20 mm

Table 2: Depth assessments for contaminants

Note 1: For STANDING WATER, 04 (4 mm) is the minimum depth value at and above which the depth should be reported. From 3 mm and below, the runway third should be considered WET.

Note 2: For SLUSH, WET SNOW and DRY SNOW, depths up to and including 3 mm should be reported as 03 (3 mm).

Note 3: Above 4 mm for STANDING WATER and above 3 mm for SLUSH, WET SNOW and DRY SNOW, an assessed value should be reported and a significant change relates to the observed change from this assessed value.

AI for Aviation Professionals

Aviation.Bot is an AI tool that assists you with aviation compliance.