AMC 25.1581 Aeroplane flight manual
1 PURPOSE
The primary
purpose of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) approved Aeroplane
Flight Manual (AFM) is to provide an authoritative source of information
considered to be necessary for safely operating the aeroplane. This Acceptable
Means of Compliance (AMC) identifies the information that must be provided in
the AFM under the airworthiness regulations and provides guidance as to the
form and content of the approved portion of an AFM. Although mandatory terms
such as ‘shall’ or ‘must’ are used in this AMC, because the AMC method of
compliance is not mandatory, these terms apply only to applicants who seek to
demonstrate compliance by following the specific procedures described in this
AMC.
2 RELATED CERTIFICATION
SPECIFICATIONS (CS)
Paragraphs
25.1581, 25.1583, 25.1585, 25.1587 and 25.1591 of the CS and noise regulations
identify the information that must be provided in the AFM. Paragraph 25.1581
also requires ‘other information that is necessary for safe operation because
of the design, operating, or handling characteristics’. Additional related
requirements are the applicable operational rules.
3 DEFINITIONS
a. Aeroplane Flight
Manual (AFM). A EASA approved document that contains information
(limitations, operating procedures, performance information, etc.) necessary
to operate the aeroplane at the level of safety established by the aeroplane’s
certification basis.
b. Flight Crew Operating
Manual (FCOM). A document developed by a manufacturer that describes,
in detail, the characteristics and operation of the aeroplane or its systems.
c. Safe Operation.
For the purposes of this AMC, safe operation means operation of the aeroplane
in a manner that is mandatory, or is recommended, for compliance with the
airworthiness requirements.
d. Limitation.
For the purposes of this AMC, an AFM limitation establishes the approved
bounds of operation of the aeroplane or its systems.
e. Aeroplane Flight
Manual Warnings, Cautions and Notes. The AFM contains operating
procedures, techniques, etc. that may be categorised as warnings, cautions and
notes as defined in the following paragraphs. The following definitions should
not be confused with the colour requirements prescribed in CS 25.1322
for warning, caution and advisory lights installed in the cockpit.
(1) Warning. An operating procedure,
technique, etc. that may result in personal injury or loss of life if not
followed.
(2) Caution. An operating procedure,
technique, etc. that may result in damage to equipment if not followed.
(3) Note. An operating procedure, technique,
etc. considered essential to emphasise. Information contained in notes may
also be safety related.
f. Procedure. A
procedure is a step-by-step method used to accomplish a specific task.
(1) Emergency. A procedure requiring immediate
flight crew action to protect the aeroplane and occupants from serious harm.
(2) Abnormal or Non-normal. A procedure
requiring flight crew action, due to failure of a system or component, to
maintain an acceptable level of airworthiness for continued safe flight and
landing.
(3) Normal. A procedure associated with
systems that are functioning in their usual manner.
g. Revision. A
change to the content of the AFM through the addition, deletion, or
modification of material.
h. Appendices and
Supplements. Additions to the AFM that may or may not supersede
existing AFM material.
(1) Appendix. An addition to the AFM to cover
the installation of optional equipment or specific operations (engine
inoperative ferry, reduced thrust or power takeoff, configuration deviation
list (CDL), etc.).
(2) Supplement. Information that supersedes or
is in addition to the basic AFM resulting from the issuance of a supplemental
type certificate (STC), or from approved changes to AFM limitations,
procedures, or performance information without an STC.
4 DISCUSSION
The AFM
provides information to safely operate the aeroplane under normal, abnormal
and emergency conditions. The AFM contains the operating limitations,
operating procedures, and performance information for the aeroplane.
a. Historically,
the AFM was often the only source of information available to the flight crew
for safely operating a transport category aeroplane. Consequently, the form
and content of these earlier AFMs were designed to meet the needs of the
flight crew. For example, very detailed operating procedures were presented in
a form easily used in the cockpit (e.g., checklist format).
b. As more complex
equipment was incorporated into transport category aeroplanes, many
aeroplane and equipment manufacturers developed separate operating manuals
intended for on-board use by the flight crew. These operating manuals are
generically referred to within this AMC as Flight Crew Operating Manuals (FCOM).
By locating information such as cockpit checklists, systems descriptions and
detailed procedures in the FCOM, the bulk and complexity of the AFM can be
kept manageable. As a result, the AFM for many transport aeroplanes has
evolved into more of a reference document than a document used frequently by
the flight crew. In recognition of the usefulness and convenience provided by
these FCOMs, the normal operating procedures information in the AFMs for these
transport category aeroplanes should be limited to those procedures considered
‘peculiar’ to the operation of that aeroplane type.
c. The AFM should be
limited to the smallest practicable amount of material that is
appropriate for the intended operation of the aeroplane. In general, the
systems descriptions and procedures provided in the AFM for most large
transport aeroplanes should be limited to that which is uniquely related to
aeroplane safety or airworthiness. Since the AFM still serves as the sole
operating manual for many small transport category aeroplanes, these AFMs
should continue to contain detailed operating information.
d. Widespread use of
computers has led to the capability of replacing or supplementing parts
of the conventional paper AFM with a computerized version. Guidance for EASA
approval of computerized AFM information is presented in Appendix 1
of this AMC.
5 GENERAL GUIDELINES
Previously
approved AFMs are unaffected by this AMC. When such manuals are amended, the
concepts of this AMC should be applied, if practicable.
a. Segregation of
Approved and Unapproved Material. Paragraph 25.1581 of the CS requires
that EASA approved information be segregated, identified, and clearly
distinguished from each unapproved part of the AFM. Unapproved material should
be labelled that it is for guidance information only, and must be located in a
different section than the approved material.
b. Provisions
for approval of and revisions to the AFM are as follows:
(1) Each page of the approved portion should
bear the notation, ‘EASA Approved’, a unique date of approval or revision
number for that page, the aeroplane type or model designation, and an
appropriate document identification number. For AFM pages produced by an STC
applicant, both the STC applicant’s name and the aeroplane type or model
designation should appear.
(2) All AFMs, revisions, appendices, and
supplements requiring EASA approval must be submitted to the EASA. A log of
currently approved pages in the AFM should be furnished in each copy of the
manual. A location should be provided on the log for the approval signature
and the approval date. Alternatively, a specific approval page can be
furnished for the approval signature and the current revision status.
(3) When revisions are incorporated, a means
of indicating those parts of the information that have been changed should be
provided. For example, vertical bars placed in the margin of the revised page
may be used for this purpose. Each revised page should be identified in the
same manner as the original, with the exception of the new date and revision
notation, as applicable.
(4) Appendices and supplements should be
incorporated in the AFM in a separate section appropriately identified at the
end of the basic manual. Supplements should normally follow appendices.
Format, page identification, organisation, and other details should be the
same as that of the basic manual.
(5) Appendices and supplements may be
developed by the TC holder, STC applicant, or the operator, and should be
submitted for evaluation and approval according to EASA certification
procedures. Usually, the TC holder writes appendices to the AFM, and an STC applicant
or operator supplements the AFM. However, an STC applicant may elect to
produce a completely new AFM.
(6) It may be necessary to provide a greater
amount of descriptive and procedural information in appendices and supplements
than that appearing in the basic AFM, if the appendix or supplement is the
only source for this information.
c. The
AFM may address either a single aeroplane model (i.e., hardware build) or
several models of the same aeroplane type. If information is provided for more
than one model, the AFM should clearly identify which operating limitations,
operating procedures, and performance information apply to each model (e.g.,
by model designation, serial number, etc.). If the AFM format is such that
different pages apply to different aeroplanes, the log of pages should clearly
identify the specific pages of the AFM that apply to each aeroplane.
d. Any
required weight and balance information that is not a physical part of the
AFM, must be incorporated by reference in the Limitations Section of the AFM
per CS 25.1583(c).
e. Aeroplane
Flight Manual Units. The AFM units should be consistent with the flight
deck instrumentation, placards, and other measuring devices for a particular
aeroplane. The AFM should be given in SI units (International System of
Units). This does not apply to the units of measurement related to:
—
airspeed:
knots.
—
altitude:
feet.
—
vertical
speed: feet per minute.
—
navigational
distance: nautical miles.
Systems of
units must be properly identified and presented. Multiple scales may be used
on AFM charts to show different units, e.g., pounds and kilograms. However,
the charts should be constructed to minimise any misunderstanding or
interpolation problems by, for example, using a transfer scale so that
principal values of each of the units are on major grid lines or index marks.
6 AEROPLANE FLIGHT
MANUAL CONTENTS
The AFM
should be divided into the following sections, as appropriate for the specific
aeroplane type or model. For purposes of standardisation, it is recommended
that the sequence of sections and of items within sections follow this
outline.
a. Introductory Section.
The intent of the introductory material is to identify the revision status and
control the applicability and content of the AFM. The normal content of this
section is as follows:
(1) Title page. The title page should include
the manufacturer’s name, the aeroplane model designation, the commercial
designation or name, if any, assigned to the aeroplane, and an appropriate
document identification number. Provision should be made for the inclusion of
the approval date of the basic document and the signature, name, and title of
the EASA approving official.
(2) Log of revisions.
(3) Revision highlights, if appropriate.
(4) Log of pages (including all information
necessary to determine which pages apply to a given aeroplane model (i.e.,
hardware build)).
(5) Compatibility listing of appendices and
supplements produced by the aeroplane manufacturer.
(6) Table of contents. (Alternatively, a table
of contents for each section may be placed at the beginning of that section.)
(7) List of abbreviations.
b. Limitations Section.
The purpose of the Limitations Section is to present those operating
limitations appropriate to the aeroplane model as established in the course of
the type certification process in determining compliance with the applicable
certification requirements (e.g., CS-25 and noise regulations). The operating
limitations must be expressed in mandatory, not permissive, language. The
terminology used in the AFM must be consistent with the relevant regulatory
language. Limitations prescribed by operating rules may be incorporated as
appropriate.
(1) Weight Limitations. A statement of the
maximum certificated take-off and landing weights must be provided. The
maximum taxi/ramp weight, maximum zero-fuel weight, and any other fixed limit
on weight, should also be included. Any limitations on aeroplane loading
associated with the stated weight limitations must be included in the AFM or
addressed in a separate weight and balance document. Separate take-off and
landing weight limits may be listed corresponding to each applicable
constraint (e.g., structural or noise requirements, customer option, etc.), if
the instructions in the Limitations Section clearly state that the most
restrictive of these take-off and landing weight limitations represent the
maximum certified weights.
(i) For those performance weight limits that
vary with runway length, altitude, temperature and other variables, the
variation in weight limitations may be presented as graphs in the Performance
Section of the AFM and included as limitations by specific reference in the
Limitations Section.
(ii) Only one set of noise limited take-off and
landing weights may be established for a specific aeroplane model (i.e.,
hardware build).
(2) Noise limitations. An aeroplane model
(i.e., hardware build) may not be identified as complying with the
requirements of more than one noise stage level at a time. The operating
limitations contained in the Limitations Section of the AFM should comply with
the noise certification criteria for that stage. If the noise certification
status of an aeroplane model is upgraded to a more stringent stage level the
AFM must either be revised or supplemented, whichever is appropriate, to
include only information appropriate to the new stage level.
(i) Landing Flap Restriction. An operating
limitation preventing the use of an approved landing flap setting to comply
with noise requirements can only be established under the airworthiness
requirements or as a voluntary design change. A statement must be added to the
Limitations Section to preclude using that landing flap setting for normal
operations. Emergency procedures may, however, continue to use the restricted
flap setting. A placard must be placed in the aeroplane and appropriate other
means must be installed (e.g., crushable guard on the restricted portion of
the flap selection quadrant), to prevent using the restricted flap setting for
normal operations.
(ii) Reduced and Derated Take-off Thrust or
Power. Noise certification levels are determined at the maximum all-engines
operating take-off thrust or power. Reduced and derated thrust or power are
not changes that would invalidate the noise certification status of the
aeroplane, provided the full rated take-off thrust or power remains approved
for that aeroplane.
(3) Operating Limitations. The extremes of the
operational variables, including any appropriate descriptions for which
compliance with the certification requirements has been shown and for which
the AFM data have been approved, should be listed with respect to the
following:
(i) Operations.
(A) Maximum take-off, landing and zero-fuel
weight limits.
(B) Minimum in-flight weight.
(C) Minimum and maximum pressure altitude for
which operation is limited for each flight phase (take-off, en route and
landing). Further altitude limitations caused by changes to structure,
powerplant, equipment characteristics or flight characteristics (e.g. due to
failures) should be provided.
(D) Ambient atmospheric temperature (maximum
and minimum).
(E) Minimum control speed. (This information
may be located in the Performance Section of the AFM, with cross-reference in
the Limitations Section.)
(F) Maximum tailwind. The maximum allowable
tailwind component for take-off and landing should normally be limited to 10
knots. If airworthiness approval has been granted for take-off and landing in
tailwinds greater than 10 knots, the AFM should provide the limiting tailwind
value, accompanied by a statement such as the following:
The
capability of this aeroplane has been satisfactorily demonstrated for take-off
and manual landing with tailwinds up to knots. This finding does not
constitute operational approval to conduct take-offs or landings with tailwind
components greater than 10 knots.
(G) Maximum demonstrated crosswind.
(1) If the maximum demonstrated crosswind is
considered to be limiting for either take-off or landing, the crosswind
limitation must be stated in the Limitations Section. If the crosswind value
is considered to be limiting for one type of operation (e.g. autoland) but not
for another, the crosswind limitation may also state the specific operations
to which it applies.
(2) If the maximum crosswind value
demonstrated under CS 25.237 is considered to be not limiting for both
take-off and landing operations, the demonstrated crosswind value may be
presented in a section other than the Limitations Section.
(H) Runway slope. Limitations and performance
information should normally be restricted to runway gradients up to ±2
percent. Limitations for runway slopes greater than ±2 percent may be approved
if the effects of the larger slopes are validated in a manner acceptable to
the EASA.
(I) Runway surface type (smooth and
hard-surfaced, or any other type approved).
(ii) En route Flight Paths.
(A) Maximum altitude.
(B) Ambient atmospheric temperature (maximum
and minimum).
(C) In accordance with CS 25.123(a),
en route flight path data must be presented in the AFM for all altitudes and
temperatures within the operating envelope limits of the aeroplane.
(4) Centre-of-Gravity Limits. Indicate by
using tables or graphs the centre of gravity (c.g.) limits for taxi, take-off
and landing, zero fuel weight, and for any other practicably separable flight
condition. As appropriate, data should be provided for a range of weights
between the maximum taxi weight and the minimum in-flight weight. The data
should be shown with the appropriate gear position for the phase of flight,
and gear effects on the centre-of-gravity should be built into the charts.
Data may be presented for gear-extended position only if there is proper
accounting for the moment change due to gear retraction. The c.g. limits
should be presented in terms of either the distance-from-a specified datum or
as a percentage of the mean aerodynamic chord (MAC). Either the location of
the datum or the length and location of the MAC should be stated, as
applicable. If alternate forward c.g. limits have been approved, these limits
should be presented and appropriately identified.
(5) Fuel Limitations. A statement in
accordance with CS 25.1585(d) must be included. Operating limitations due
to fuel related considerations (e.g. lateral fuel imbalance, fuel management,
fuel temperature) and their effects on altitude limitations (e.g. boost
pump(s) inoperative, fuel type) should also be provided.
(6) Powerplant Limitations.
(i) State all limitations necessary to ensure
safe operation of engines, propellers, fuel systems and powerplant
accessories, including auxiliary powerplants (see CS 25.1521
and 25J1521). If the use of reduced or derated take-off
thrust or power is requested, then any associated operating or performance
limitations should be included in accordance with acceptable reduced and
derated takeoff thrust or power procedures. Limitations related to the use of
reverse thrust in flight or on the ground should be clearly identified. Any
engine limitations associated with operations in adverse weather (heavy rain,
hail, turbulence, lightning, etc.) should be specified. Any icing conditions
that may impact the normal operation of the engine should also be defined.
(ii) Because engine ice protection is critical
to safety in icing conditions, a statement should be included in the
Limitations Section that the engine ice protection must be on during all
ground and flight operations when icing conditions exist or are anticipated.
The following definition of icing conditions should also be included in the
Limitations Section:
Icing
conditions – Icing conditions exist when outside air temperature (OAT) on the
ground and for take-off, or total air temperature (TAT) in flight, is 10
degrees C or below and visible moisture in any form is present (such as
clouds, fog with visibility of one mile or less, rain, snow, sleet or ice
crystals).
Icing
conditions also exist when the OAT on the ground and for take-off is 10
degrees C or below when operating on ramps, taxiways, or runways where surface
snow, ice, standing water or slush may be ingested by the engines or freeze on
engines, nacelles or engine sensor probes.
(7) Airspeed and Mach Number Limitations. All
airspeed limitations should be in terms of indicated airspeed and in units of
knots or Mach number, where applicable and should be consistent with cockpit
indication. If airspeed or Mach number limitations vary with altitude or
loading conditions, such variation must be shown. Limitations data must be
included for at least the following:
(i) Maximum operating limit speed, VMO/MMO,
together with a statement that this speed limit may not be deliberately
exceeded in any regime of flight (climb, cruise or descent), unless a higher
speed is authorised for flight test or pilot training. The last phrase (unless
a higher speed is authorised for flight test or pilot training) may be omitted
at the option of the applicant.
(ii) Manoeuvring speed (established under CS 25.1507) together with statements, as applicable to the particular design,
explaining that:
(a) full application of pitch, roll, or yaw
controls should be confined to speeds below the manoeuvring speed; and
(b) rapid and large alternating control
inputs, especially in combination with large changes in pitch, roll, or yaw,
and full control inputs in more than one axis at the same time, should be
avoided as they may result in structural failures at any speed, including
below the manoeuvring speed.
(iii) Flap-extended speed, VFE, for
each approved flap and high lift device position.
(iv) Landing gear operating speed, VLO,
together with a statement that this is the maximum speed at which it is safe
to extend or retract the landing gear. If different speeds are established for
extension and retraction, each speed should be listed and defined.
(v) Landing gear extended speed, VLE,
together with a statement that this is the maximum speed at which the
aeroplane can be safely flown with the landing gear extended and locked.
(vi) Any other limiting speeds for extendable
devices other than the landing gear, should be included as applicable (e.g.
spoilers, thrust reversers, landing lights, ram air turbine (RAT), windows
that may be opened in flight, etc.).
(8) Manoeuvring Load Factor Limitations. The
positive and negative flight manoeuvring limit load factors (expressed in
terms of ‘g’s’) for which the structure is approved should be provided,
including any variation with the position of the high lift devices.
(9) Kinds of Operations. This subsection
should contain a statement similar to the following:
This
aeroplane is certificated as a Large Turbine-powered Aeroplane and is eligible
for the following kinds of operations when the appropriate instruments and
equipment required by the airworthiness and operating requirements are
installed and approved and are in operable condition.
The approval
status of the following should be stated:
(i) Operation in atmospheric icing
conditions.
(ii) Extended over-water operation.
(iii) Extended range operations with two-engine
aeroplanes (ETOPS).
(iv) Day and night operations under visual
flight rules (VFR).
(v) Operations under instrument flight rules
(IFR).
(vi) Backing the aeroplane with reverse thrust.
(vii) Category I, II or III operations.
(10) Minimum Flight Crew. The minimum number of
flight crew approved to operate the aeroplane should be stated.
(11) Systems and Equipment Limitations. All
limitations applicable to systems and equipment installations that are
considered necessary for safe operation must be included. Examples of systems
and equipment installations for which limitations may be appropriate include,
but are not limited to, electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, cabin
pressurisation, air conditioning, airframe fire protection, airframe ice
protection, auto braking systems, autopilot, autothrottle, flight director,
yaw damper, anti-skid devices, performance or flight management system
(including software identifier if displayable), etc.
(12) Miscellaneous Limitations. This item should
include any information not specified under the preceding headings but
necessary, as a limitation, to ensure safe operation of the aeroplane.
c. Operating Procedures
Section. The Operating Procedures Section of the AFM should contain, as
a minimum, the essential information, peculiar to the particular aeroplane
type design, that is needed for safe operation under normal and
other-than-normal conditions. Procedures not directly related to
airworthiness, or not under control of the flight crew, should not be included
in the AFM. A notation similar to the following should be placed at the
beginning of the Operating Procedures Section.
The
operating procedures contained in this manual have been developed and
recommended by the manufacturer and approved by the EASA for use in operating
this aeroplane. These procedures are provided as guidance and should not be
construed as prohibiting the operator from developing equivalent procedures in
accordance with the applicable operating rules.
(1) Procedures Categories. Information should
be presented for normal, non-normal, and emergency procedures and be
distinctly separated. Procedural tasks considered to be recall or immediate
action items, which must be accomplished from memory, should be clearly
identified.
(2) Format. Procedures should be presented
either in a narrative or a checklist format, depending upon the intended use
of the AFM.
(i) Narrative. This format is acceptable if
sources of procedures information other than the AFM are intended for flight
crew use (e.g. Flight Crew Operating Manual (FCOM)). Procedures presented in
this format should be drafted in a manner from which the needed sequence can
be easily established.
(ii) Checklist. This format should be used if
the AFM is intended to be used directly by the flight crew for operating
procedures.
(3) Procedures Development. Prior to initial
type certification, it is essential to verify that proposed procedures are
technically valid and operationally practicable. It is recognised that such
procedures may have had only limited operational exposure at the time of
certification and may need to be revised based on service experience.
(4) Procedures Content. The content and level
of detail for the normal, non-normal, and emergency procedures provided in the
AFM should be based on the intended use of the AFM. More information and
detail should be provided in AFMs that are intended to be the flight crew’s
primary sources of operating procedures information than for AFMs that are not
intended to be used directly by the flight crew.
(i) General. Classifying an operating
procedure as normal or as non-normal should reflect whether the aeroplane’s
systems are operating normally. Procedures associated with failed or
inoperative systems should be considered non-normal. Procedures associated
with glideslope deviation, ground proximity warning, all engines operating
go-around, turbulent air penetration, etc, which do not occur routinely,
should be placed in the normal procedures subsection, provided the aeroplane’s
systems are operating normally.
(ii) Other Sources of Procedures Information.
The flight crew of large transport category aeroplanes typically use other
sources of operating procedures information other than the AFM. Examples of
other sources of operating procedures information include manufacturer- or
operatorproduced operating manuals, Quick Reference Handbooks (QRH), System
Pilot’s Guides and Emergency or Abnormal Checklists. For these aeroplanes,
items such as cockpit checklists, systems descriptions, and the associated
normal procedures should not be presented in the AFM if they are provided in
other documents acceptable to the Agency. Normal procedures that are necessary
for safe operation should be presented in the AFM, but the remaining normal
procedures should be placed in the manufacturer produced FCOM (or other
acceptable sources of operating procedures information). The non-normal
procedures section of the AFM for these types of aeroplanes should include, as
a minimum, procedures dictated by the aeroplane’s system and failure modes, and
may also include those emergency procedures listed in paragraph 6.c(5) of this
AMC. Whenever procedures are provided in another source rather than the AFM, a
statement should be placed in the appropriate procedures section of the AFM
referencing where the detailed procedures information can be found.
(iii) AFM Used Directly. For those manufacturers
and operators that do not produce other sources of procedures information
(generally manufacturers and operators of small transports), the AFM is the
only source of this information. In this circumstance, the AFM operating
procedures information must be comprehensive and include information such as
cockpit checklists, systems descriptions and associated procedures.
(5) Emergency Procedures. The emergency
procedures can be included either in a dedicated section of the AFM or in the
non-normal procedures section. In either case, this section should include the
procedures for handling any situation that is in a category similar to the
following:
(i) Engine failure with severe damage or
separation.
(ii) Multiple engine failure.
(iii) Fire in flight.
(iv) Smoke control. The following should be
clearly stated in the AFM:
After
conducting the fire or smoke procedures, land at the nearest suitable airport,
unless it is visually verified that the fire has been extinguished.
(v) Rapid decompression.
(vi) Emergency descent.
(vii) Uncommanded reverser deployment in flight.
(viii) Crash landing or ditching.
(ix) Emergency evacuation.
d. Performance
Section. This section of the AFM contains the performance limitations,
other data required by the applicable airworthiness and noise regulations, and
any special conditions that may apply. Additional information may be provided
to assist the operator in complying with the operating rules or for
implementing unique operational needs. The performance information should
cover the operating range of weights, altitudes, temperatures, aeroplane
configurations, thrust ratings, and any other operational variables stated as
operational performance limitations for the aeroplane. If additional
performance information is presented for operation at a specific altitude,
these performance data should cover a pressure altitude span of at least the
specific altitude ±1,000 feet to allow an operator to adequately account for
pressure altitude variations. It is recommended that such data be included as
a separate section or appendix to the AFM.
(1) General. Include all descriptive
information necessary to identify the configuration and conditions for which
the performance data are applicable. Such information should include the type
or model designations of the aeroplane and its engines, the approved flap
settings, a brief description of aeroplane systems and equipment that affect
performance (e.g. anti-skid, automatic spoilers, etc.), and a statement
indicating whether such systems and equipment are operative or inoperative.
This section should also include definitions of terms used in the Performance
Section (e.g. IAS, CAS, ISA, configuration, net flight path, icing conditions,
etc.), plus calibration data for airspeed (flight and ground), Mach number,
altimeter, air temperature and other pertinent information. The airspeed,
altitude and air temperature calibration data should be presented for the
following ranges:
(i) Take-off configurations:
(A) Ground run, 0·8 V1MIN to V2MAX.
(B) In-flight, V2MIN to VFE.
(ii) Approach and landing configurations:
(A) Approach, 1·13 VSR to VFE.
(B) Landing, 1·23 VSR to VFE.
(iii) En route configuration:
(A) Airspeed and Altimeter: For the
take-off/take-off path altitude range, 1.18 VSR to VMO/MMO.
(B) Airspeed and Altimeter: For higher
altitudes, from 1.18 VSR or the speed for 1·2 g buffet onset
margin, whichever is lower, to VMO/MMO.
(C) Mach Number: From the lowest useful Mach
number (generally in the range of 0·4 to 0·5) to MMO.
(D) Total or Static Air Temperature: For Mach
numbers corresponding to the speed ranges noted in paragraphs 6.d(1)(iii)(A)
and (B) of this AMC.
(2) Performance Procedures. The procedures,
techniques and other conditions associated with the AFM performance data
should be included. Performance procedures may be presented as a performance
subsection or in connection with a particular performance graph. In the latter
case, a comprehensive listing of the conditions associated with the particular
performance data may serve as procedures if sufficiently complete. The AFM
should also include adequate information to enable the operator to show
compliance with CS 25.1001 for each take-off.
(3) Thrust or Power Setting. Thrust or power
settings should be provided for at least take-off, maximum continuous, and
go-around thrust or power, along with the thrust or power setting procedures
necessary to obtain the performance shown in the AFM. These data should be
shown for each applicable thrust or power setting parameter. If backing the
aeroplane by reverse thrust is proposed, thrust setting limits should be
established considering contaminated runway, foreign object damage potential,
environmental control system impact, aeroplane weight and c.g., cockpit
visibility, effect of braking, etc.
(4) Minimum Control Speeds. Minimum control
speed data may be located in the Performance Section with a reference in the
Limitations Section as to its location.
(5) Stall Speeds. The stall speeds established
in showing compliance with certification requirements should be presented,
together with associated conditions. Data should be presented in terms of
calibrated airspeed. If applicable, stall speed increments with accreted ice
must be provided.
(6) Take-off Speeds. The take-off speeds, V1,
VR and V2 must be presented in the AFM, together with
the associated conditions. These speeds should be presented in units
consistent with cockpit instrument indication. V1 and VR
speeds should be based upon ground effect calibration data while V2
speeds should be based upon free air calibration data. The take-off speeds
associated with minimum control speeds and the maximum energy absorption
capability of the brakes should be included. At the option of the applicant,
the AFM may also include the V1 speeds associated with unbalanced
field lengths. At all conditions and aeroplane configurations represented in
the AFM (i.e., at all altitudes, temperatures, weights, winds, runway slopes,
flap settings, etc.), the accuracy of the V1 speed should either 1)
be within 1·5 knots of the V1 speed used to calculate the take-off
and accelerate-stop distances, or 2) not cause an increase to these distances
of more than the greater of 100 feet or the incremental increase resulting
from a 1·5 knots variation in V1 speed.
(7) Take-off and Accelerate-Stop Distances.
Take-off and accelerate-stop distances, complying with CS 25.105, 25.109, 25.113, and
25.1591
must be provided. At the option of the applicant, and with concurrence by the
Agency, additional data may be provided for operations on other than smooth
hard-surfaced runways.
(8) Climb Limited Take-off Weight. The climb
limited take-off weight, which is the most limiting weight showing compliance
with CS 25.121(a), (b) and (c), must be provided.
(9) Miscellaneous Take-off Weight Limits.
Take-off weight limits should be shown for any equipment or characteristic of
the aeroplane that imposes an additional take-off weight restriction (e.g.
maximum tyre speed, maximum brake energy, fuel jettison consideration,
inoperative system(s), etc.).
(10) Take-off Climb Performance. For the
prescribed take-off climb aeroplane configurations, the climb gradients must
be presented, together with associated conditions. The scheduled climb
speed(s) should be included.
(11) Take-off Flight Path Data. Take-off flight
paths, or performance information necessary to construct such paths, together
with the associated conditions (e.g. procedures and speeds), should be
presented for each approved take-off configuration. The presentation should
include all flight path segments existing between the end of the take-off
distance and the end of the take-off path, as defined in CS 25.111(a).
Such data must be based upon net performance, as prescribed in CS 25.115(b) and (c).
(12) En route Flight Path Data. The net flight
path gradient data prescribed in CS 25.123 must be presented, together with
the associated conditions (e.g. procedures and speeds). Data must be presented
for one- and two-engine-inoperative cases, as applicable, throughout the
approved operating altitude and temperature envelope.
(13) Climb Limited Landing Weight. The climb
limiting landing weight, which is the most limiting weight showing compliance
with CS 25.119 and 25.121(d), should be provided.
(14) Miscellaneous Landing Weight Limits. Landing
weight limits for any equipment or characteristic of the aeroplane
configuration that imposes an additional landing weight restriction should be
shown.
(15) Approach Climb Performance. For the approach
climb configuration, the climb gradients (CS 25.121(d)) and weights up to maximum take-off weight (CS 25.1587(b)(3)) should be presented, together with associated conditions (e.g.
procedures and speeds). The effects of ice accretion on unprotected portions
of the airframe and the effects of engine and wing ice protection systems
should be provided.
(16) Landing Climb Performance. Data for the
landing climb configuration should be presented in a manner similar to that
described for the approach configuration above.
(17) Landing Approach Speeds. The scheduled
speeds associated with the approved landing distances and operational landing
runway lengths (see paragraph 6.d(18) of this AMC) should be presented,
together with associated conditions.
(18) Landing Distance. The landing distance from
a height of 50 ft must be presented either directly or with the factors
required by the operating regulations, together with associated conditions and
weights up to the maximum take-off weight. For all landplanes, landing
distance data must be presented for smooth, dry, hard-surfaced runways for standard
day temperatures. With concurrence by the Agency, additional data may be
presented for other temperatures and runway slopes within the operational
limits of the aeroplane, or for operations on other than smooth, hard-surfaced
runways. For all weather operations, additional landing performance data may
be required.
The
unfactored landing distances for dry and wet runways are minimum normalised
values based on certification test procedures. For those distances, a runway
surface with no slope at standard day temperature as well as standard landing
speeds are assumed.
The AFM
should state the following conditions for which the landing distances are
valid:
—
runway
slope,
—
temperature,
—
landing
configuration, and
—
thrust
or power setting.
The landing
distances at the time of arrival (LDTA) reflect the performance that is
expected in operational conditions. The AFM should present LDTA as follows:
—
for
all runway condition codes from 1 to 6,
—
for
certified landing configurations,
—
for
final-approach speeds (VAPP) including recommended speed
increments,
—
with
and without reverse thrust credit, and
—
within
the certified flight envelope for:
—
runway
slope, and
—
outside
air temperature.
The AFM
should state that a safety margin should be applied to the landing distances
to account for operating practices and expected operational variability.
The
performance information that is provided in the AFM to comply with CS 25.1592 and the LDTA concept in the applicable air operations regulations
produce a large variety of landing distance data being provided in the AFM.
Therefore, the intended use of each piece of the landing-distance information
should be properly explained in the AFM.
The AFM
should emphasise the need to apply a safety margin, particularly to such
landing distances whose method of derivation is the least conservative. Such
landing distances are, for example, those determined by a maximum-performance
manoeuvre based on data (e.g. flight path angle and touchdown sink rate) that
are normalised to specified conditions so that the landing distances achieved
in operational conditions may be greater.
(19) Performance Limits and Information Variation
with Centre of Gravity. If performance information, (e.g. buffet boundary) is
not presented for the most critical c.g. condition, the AFM should present the
effect of variation with c.g.
(20) Noise Data. The noise levels achieved during
type certification in accordance with the applicable noise requirements should
be presented, together with associated conditions and with the following note:
No
determination has been made by the EASA that the noise levels of this aircraft
are or should be acceptable or unacceptable for operation at, into or out of
any airport.
The noise
levels achieved during type certification should be included in the AFM and
consist of only one take-off, one sideline, and one approach noise level for
each aeroplane model (i.e. hardware build). The noise certification standard
complied with should accompany the noise level information to indicate the
compliance status. Supplementary information (labeled as such) may be added to
the AFM concerning noise levels for other configurations or conditions.
(21) Miscellaneous Performance Data. Any
performance information or data not covered in the previous items that are
required for safe operation because of unusual design features or operating or
handling characteristics should be furnished. For example, the maximum quick
turn around weight should be provided.
e. Loading
Instructions. CS 25.1583 requires instructions necessary to ensure
loading of the aeroplane within the established limits of weight and
centre-of-gravity, and to maintain the loading within such limits in flight to
be presented either in the AFM or included in a separate weight and balance
document referenced in the AFM Limitations Section. If applicable, the loading
instructions must refer to flight procedures that consider the change to the
aeroplane’s centre of gravity as fuel is consumed.
(1) Loading Instructions Presented in a
Separate Document. If the loading instructions are presented in a separate
document, the AFM Limitations Section should contain at least the following:
(i) Maximum taxi weight limits.
(ii) Maximum take-off weight limits.
(iii) Maximum landing weight limits.
(iv) Maximum zero fuel weight limits.
(v) Minimum in-flight weight.
(vi) Centre-of-gravity limits.
(vii) Information required to maintain the
aeroplane within the above limits.
(2) Weight-and-Balance Data. Documentation of
the weight-and-balance material outlined below is normally adequate for
aeroplanes with conventional loading and fuel-management techniques. For
aeroplanes that require fuel to be redistributed (other than through normal
consumption) to maintain loading within prescribed limits, the loading
instructions should be expanded as necessary.
(i) Weight Limits. A list and identification
of all weight limitations should be included.
(ii) Centre-of-Gravity Limits. The approved centre-of-gravity
range, or ranges, should be presented with due accounting for aeroplane
configuration (i.e. landing gear position, passenger loading, cargo
distribution etc.) such that loading limits can be maintained.
(iii) Dimensions, Datum and MAC. The dimensions
and relative location of aeroplane features associated with weighing and
loading of the aeroplane and with weight-and-balance computations should be
described or illustrated.
(iv) Configuration Checklist or Equipment List.
The aeroplane should be defined or described sufficiently to identify the
presence or absence of optional systems, features or installations that are
not readily apparent. In addition, all other items of fixed or removable
equipment included in the empty weight should be listed.
(v) Fuel and Other Liquids. All fuel and other
liquids, including passenger service liquids, that are included in the empty
weight should be identified and listed, together with the information
necessary to enable ready duplication of the particular condition.
(vi) Weighing Computations. Computation of the
empty weight and the empty-weight c.g. location should be included.
(vii) Loading Schedule. The loading schedule
should be included, if appropriate.
(viii) Loading Instructions. Complete instructions
relative to the loading procedure or to the use of the loading schedule should
be included.
(ix) Compartment and floor load limits.
7 CONFIGURATION
DEVIATION LIST (CDL)
Operation of
the aeroplane without certain secondary airframe and engines parts is allowed
through the use of an approved CDL. The CDL should be included in the AFM as a
separate appendix. The following guidance should be followed when preparing
the CDL.
a. The parts or
combinations of parts permitted to be missing, together with the
associated performance penalties and other limitations should be determined
and presented in the same format as the Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL).
b. Unless it can be
established that a zero or negligible performance degradation occurs as
a result of a part missing from the aeroplane (see paragraph 8.b of this AMC),
a performance penalty should be presented for each part or for each
combination of parts.
c. Performance penalties
are normally presented as weight or percent weight decrements.
Equivalent penalties expressed as other parameters are also acceptable. A
single performance penalty applicable to all AFM performance limitations may
be presented for a missing part or, subject to certain restrictions,
performance penalties may be presented for each phase of flight as follows:
(1) Only a single performance penalty for
take-off and a single performance penalty for landing will be permitted. For
take-off, the penalty shall be the most restrictive of the take-off field
length, first, second and final segment climbs, and take-off flight path
considerations. For landing, the penalty shall be the most restrictive of
approach climb, landing climb, and landing distance considerations.
(2) Only a single weight penalty for en route
climb performance, applying to both the one-engine-inoperative and
two-engine-inoperative cases, as applicable, will be permitted.
(3) The CDL should contain the explanations of
take-off performance penalty, landing performance penalty and en route
performance penalty, as appropriate for the aeroplane, when individual
penalties are used.
d. General Limitations.
The following information should be presented in the CDL appendix:
(1) When the aeroplane is operated using the
CDL, it must be operated in accordance with the limitations specified in the
AFM, as amended in the CDL.
(2) The associated limitations must be listed
on a placard affixed in the cockpit in clear view of the pilot in command and
other appropriate crew member(s).
(3) The pilot in command should be notified of
each operation with a missing part(s) by listing the missing part(s) in the
flight or dispatch release.
(4) The operator should list in the aeroplane
logbook an appropriate notation covering the missing part(s) on each flight.
(5) If an additional part is lost in flight,
the aeroplane may not depart the airport at which it landed following this
event, until it again complies with the limitations of the CDL. This, of
course, does not preclude the issuance of a ferry permit to allow the
aeroplane to be flown to a point where the necessary repairs or replacements
can be made.
(6) No more than one part for any one system
may be missing, unless specific combinations are indicated in the CDL. Unless
otherwise specified, parts from different systems may be missing. The
performance penalties are cumulative, unless specifically designated penalties
are indicated for the combination of missing parts.
(7) No more than three parts that have each
been determined to cause a negligible performance degradation may be missing
for take-off without applying a performance penalty. When more than three such
parts are missing, a performance penalty of either 0·05 percent of the maximum
take-off weight or 50 kg, whichever is less, must be applied for
take-off, en route, and landing for each missing part.
(8) Take-off performance penalties should be
applied to the take-off weights that are limited by performance considerations
(i.e. take-off field length, first, second, or, final segment climb, or
take-off flight path). If the performance limited take-off weight is greater
than the maximum certified take-off weight, the take-off performance penalties
should be applied to the maximum certified take-off weight to ensure
compliance with the noise requirements.
(9) Landing performance penalties should be
applied to the landing weights that are limited by performance considerations
(i.e. landing field length, landing climb or approach climb). If the
performance limited landing weight is greater than the maximum certified
landing weight, the landing performance penalties should be applied to the
maximum certified landing weight to ensure compliance with the noise
requirements.
(10) En route performance penalties apply only to
operations that are limited by the one- or two-engine(s) inoperative en route
climb performance.
(11) The numbering and designation of systems in
the CDL appendix is based on Air Transport Association (ATA) Specification
100. The parts within each system are identified by functional description
and, when necessary, by part numbers.
8 ACCOUNTABILITY OF
PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION RELATIVE TO BOTH MINOR DESIGN CHANGES AND CDL ITEMS
a. General.
Whenever a minor change to the type design aerodynamic configuration or a CDL
proposal (e.g. installation of wing tip mounted emblem lights, missing flap
hinge covers, etc.), has been submitted for EASA approval, the applicable
performance degradation needs to be determined. In lieu of a complete flight
test analysis to determine the performance degradation, simple criteria are
prescribed below for establishing an acceptable level of airworthiness for the
affected items.
b. Criteria.
(1) Estimated Drag. The aerodynamic drag of
the type design change or CDL item should be evaluated. Design changes or CDL
items that have no impact on, or actually improve, the aerodynamic drag of the
aeroplane are considered to have no performance penalty. In cases where there
are quantifiable effects on aerodynamic drag (no matter how small), the drag
value should be estimated and then increased by a factor of 2, unless the
estimate drag was determined with equivalent conservatism.
(2) Performance Penalty. Performance penalties
(usually expressed in kg or percent weight) should be determined for all
appropriate performance limitations (take-off, en route and landing) based on
the effects of the estimated drag. If the resulting weight penalty is less
than the smaller of 0·05 percent of the maximum certified take-off weight or
50 kg, the performance degradation may be considered negligible. The AFM
supplement or CDL appendix should identify those type design changes or CDL
items that result in a negligible performance degradation. If the performance
degradation is not considered negligible, the appropriate performance penalty
should be provided as a limitation in the AFM supplement or in the CDL
appendix.
[Amdt
25/2]
[Amdt
25/21]
[Amdt
25/22]
[Amdt
25/26]
[Amdt
25/27]
Loading collections...