(a) (See
AMC 25.143(a) and (b)) The aeroplane must be safely controllable and manoeuvrable during:
(1) take-off;
(2) climb;
(3) level flight;
(4) descent;
(5) approach and go-around; and
(6) approach and landing.
(b) (See AMC 25.143(a)
and (b)) It must be possible to make a smooth transition from one flight
condition to any other flight condition without exceptional piloting skill,
alertness, or strength, and without danger of exceeding the aeroplane
limit-load factor under any probable operating conditions, including:
(1) The sudden failure of the critical engine;
(See AMC 25.143(b)(1).)
(2) For aeroplanes with three or more engines,
the sudden failure of the second critical engine when the aeroplane is in the
en-route, approach, or landing configuration and is trimmed with the critical
engine inoperative; and
(3) Configuration changes, including
deployment or retraction of deceleration devices; and
(4) Go-around
manoeuvres with all engines operating. The assessment must include, in
addition to controllability and manoeuvrability aspects, the flight crew
workload and the risk of a somatogravic illusion. (See AMC 25.143(b)(4))
(c) The
aeroplane must be shown to be safely controllable and manoeuvrable with the
most critical ice accretion(s) appropriate to the phase of flight as defined in appendices C and O, as applicable, in accordance with CS 25.21(g),
and with the critical engine inoperative and its propeller (if
applicable) in the minimum drag position:
(1) At
the minimum V2 for take-off;
(2) During
an approach and go-around; and
(3) During
an approach and landing.
(d) The following table prescribes, for
conventional wheel type controls, the maximum control forces permitted during
the testing required by sub-paragraphs (a) through (c) of this paragraph. (See
AMC 25.143(d)):
Force, in newton (pounds), applied to the control
wheel or rudder pedals |
Pitch |
Roll |
Yaw |
For short term application for pitch and roll
control – two hands available for control |
334 (75) |
222 (50) |
– |
For short term application for pitch and roll
control – one hand available for control |
222 (50) |
111 (25) |
– |
For short term application for yaw control |
– |
– |
667 (150) |
For long term application |
44,5 (10) |
22 (5) |
89 (20) |
(e) Approved operating procedures or conventional
operating practices must be followed when demonstrating compliance with the
control force limitations for short term application that are prescribed in
sub-paragraph (d) of this paragraph. The aeroplane must be in trim, or as near
to being in trim as practical, in the immediately preceding steady flight
condition. For the take-off condition, the aeroplane must be trimmed according
to the approved operating procedures.
(f) When demonstrating compliance with the
control force limitations for long term application that are prescribed in
sub-paragraph (d) of this paragraph, the aeroplane must be in trim, or as near
to being in trim as practical.
(g) When manoeuvring at a constant airspeed or
Mach number (up to VFC/MFC), the stick forces and the
gradient of the stick force versus manoeuvring load factor must lie within
satisfactory limits. The stick forces must not be so great as to make
excessive demands on the pilot’s strength when manoeuvring the aeroplane (see AMC No. 1 to CS 25.143(g)), and must not be so low that the aeroplane can easily be overstressed
inadvertently. Changes of gradient that occur with changes of load factor must
not cause undue difficulty in maintaining control of the aeroplane, and local
gradients must not be so low as to result in a danger of over-controlling.
(See AMC No. 2 to CS 25.143(g)).
(h) (See AMC 25.143(h)).
The manoeuvring capabilities in a constant speed coordinated turn at forward
centre of gravity, as specified in the following table, must be free of stall
warning or other characteristics that might interfere with normal manoeuvring.
CONFIGURATION |
SPEED |
MANOEUVRING BANK ANGLE IN A COORDINATED TURN |
THRUST/POWER SETTING |
TAKE-OFF |
V2 |
30° |
ASYMMETRIC WAT-LIMITED (1) |
TAKE-OFF |
V2 + xx (2) |
40° |
ALL ENGINES OPERATING CLIMB (3) |
EN-ROUTE |
VFTO |
40° |
ASYMMETRIC WAT-LIMITED (1) |
LANDING |
VREF |
40° |
SYMMETRIC FOR –3° FLIGHT PATH ANGLE |
(1) A combination of weight, altitude and
temperature (WAT) such that the thrust or power setting produces the minimum
climb gradient specified in CS 25.121 for the flight condition.
(2) Airspeed approved for all-engines-operating
initial climb.
(3) That thrust or power setting which, in the
event of failure of the critical engine and without any crew action to adjust
the thrust or power of the remaining engines, would result in the thrust or
power specified for the take-off condition at V2, or any lesser
thrust or power setting that is used for all-engines-operating initial climb
procedures.
(i) When demonstrating compliance with CS
25.143 in icing conditions -
(1) Controllability must be demonstrated with
the most critical of the ice accretion(s) for the particular phase of flight
as defined in Appendices C and O, as applicable, in accordance with CS 25.21(g).
(2) It must be shown that a push force is
required throughout a pushover manoeuvre down to a zero g load factor, or the
lowest load factor obtainable if limited by elevator power or other design
characteristic of the flight control system. It must be possible to promptly
recover from the manoeuvre without exceeding a pull control force of 222 N.
(50 lbf); and
(3) Any changes in force that the pilot must
apply to the pitch control to maintain speed with increasing sideslip angle
must be steadily increasing with no force reversals, unless the change in
control force is gradual and easily controllable by the pilot without using
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength.
(j) For flight in icing conditions before the
ice protection system has been activated and is performing its intended
function, it must be demonstrated in flight with the most critical of the ice
accretion(s) defined in appendix C, part II(e), and Appendix O, part II(d), as
applicable, in accordance with CS 25.21(g), that:
(1) The
aeroplane is controllable in a pull-up manoeuvre up to 1.5 g load factor; and
(2) There is no pitch
control force reversal during a pushover manoeuvre down to 0.5 g load factor.
(k) Side stick controllers
In lieu of
the maximum control forces provided in CS 25.143(d) for pitch and roll, and in
lieu of specific pitch force requirements of CS 25.145(b)
and CS 25.175(d), it must be shown that the temporary and
maximum prolonged force levels for side stick controllers are suitable for all
expected operating conditions and configurations, whether normal or
non-normal.
It must be
shown by flight tests that turbulence does not produce unsuitable
pilot-in-the-loop control problems when considering precision path
control/tasks.
(l) Electronic flight control systems
For
electronic flight control systems (EFCS) which embody a normal load factor
limiting system and in the absence of aerodynamic limitation (lift capability
at maximum angle of attack),
(1) The positive limiting load factor must not
be less than:
(i) 2.5 g with the EFCS functioning in
its normal mode and with the high-lift devices retracted up to VMO/MMO.
The positive limiting load factor may be gradually reduced down to 2.25 g
above VMO/MMO.;
(ii) 2.0 g with the EFCS functioning in
its normal mode and with the high-lift devices extended.
(2) The negative limiting load factor must be
equal to or more negative than:
(i) -1.0 g with the EFCS functioning in
its normal mode and with the high-lift devices retracted;
(ii) 0 g with the EFCS functioning in its
normal mode and with the high-lift devices extended.
(3) The maximum reachable positive load factor
wings level may be limited by flight control system characteristics or flight
envelope protections (other than load factor limitation), provided that:
(i) the required values are readily
achievable in turn, and
(ii) wings level pitch up responsiveness is
satisfactory.
(4) The maximum reachable negative load factor
may be limited by flight control system characteristics or flight envelope
protections (other than load factor limitation), provided that:
(i) pitch down responsiveness
is satisfactory, and
(ii) from level flight,
0 g is readily achievable, or, at least, a trajectory change of 5 degrees
per second is readily achievable at operational speeds (from VLS to
Max speed – 10 kt. VLS is the lowest speed that the crew may
fly with auto thrust or auto pilot engaged. Max speed – 10 kt) is
intended to cover typical margin from VMO/MMO to cruise
speeds and typical margin from VFE to standard speed in high-lift
configurations.
(5) Compliance demonstrations with the above
requirements may be performed without ice accretion on the airframe.
[Amdt
25/3]
[Amdt
25/7]
[Amdt
25/13]
[Amdt
25/15]
[Amdt
25/16]
[Amdt
25/18]
[Amdt
25/21]