AviationBot
Navigate / EASA / GM on Remote Aerodrome Air Traffic Services Jan 2026 / GUIDANCE MATERIAL ON REMOTE AERODROME ATS / 6. Management of change / 6.7. Contingency planning and degraded mode procedures /

6.7.2. Contingency and degraded mode procedures for RTC operations

EASA Logo
6.7.2. Contingency and degraded mode procedures for RTC operations

ED Decision 2023/005/R

In the case of operations to several aerodromes from one RTC, appropriate contingency plans for the RTC need to be developed, including, for example, contingency procedures for full RTC failure (see also Sections 5.10 and 6.1.1).

Particular care should be taken about the risk of an RTC becoming a single point of failure for aerodromes which would otherwise be independent, as it could be the case of aerodromes which could be expected to be used by airspace users as ‘alternate aerodromes’ for each other. Despite all measures to reduce its likelihood, the event of total unavailability of an RTC should be considered to enable airspace users to select a suitable alternate. It is expected that this alternate selection can guarantee the availability of an aerodrome with the expected level of ATS. Therefore all remotely controlled aerodromes should have operational contingency procedures for use by the airspace users in place in case of single or multiple failures at the RTC.

To allow suitable selection by airspace users, ATS providers should provide the appropriate information to airspace users. Chapter 9 indicates which information to publish. This information can also take other forms, such as workshops with airspace users to present relevant information for selection of alternate(s) aerodrome(s).

Frequently Asked Questions

Contingency plans for the RTC should be developed, including, for example, contingency procedures for full RTC failure.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

Particular care is needed because an RTC could become a single point of failure for aerodromes that would otherwise be independent, such as aerodromes expected to be used as 'alternate aerodromes' for each other.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

The event of total unavailability of an RTC should be considered to enable airspace users to select a suitable alternate.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

It is expected that the alternate selection can guarantee the availability of an aerodrome with the expected level of ATS.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

All remotely controlled aerodromes should have operational contingency procedures for use by airspace users in case of single or multiple failures at the RTC.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

ATS providers should provide the appropriate information to airspace users, as indicated in Chapter 9, and this information can also take other forms such as workshops with airspace users to present relevant information for selection of alternate(s) aerodrome(s).

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

Chapter 9 indicates which information to publish.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

Other forms include workshops with airspace users to present relevant information for selection of alternate(s) aerodrome(s).

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

AI for Aviation Professionals

Aviation.Bot is an AI tool that assists you with aviation compliance.