AviationBot
Navigate / EASA / Aircrew Aug 2023 / ANNEX I (Part-FCL) / SUBPART H - CLASS AND TYPE RATINGS / SECTION 2 - Specific requirements for the aeroplane category / FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation training course - aeroplanes /

GM3 FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course - aeroplanes

Airline Pilot Standards Multi-Crew Cooperation (APS MCC) training enhances flight safety. Pilot competency is graded from unsatisfactory to exemplary, based on demonstrated performance indicators. "Good" requires consistently demonstrating most indicators, while "Exemplary" means always demonstrating all indicators to the highest standard.

Frequently Asked Questions

An APS MCC grading system is an enhanced MCC training to airline pilot standards grading system.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

The competency levels in the example APS MCC grading system are Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, and Exemplary.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

The EU regulation related to multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training for aeroplanes is Aircrew (Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011), specifically #FCL.735.A.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

Guidance material related to FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course - aeroplanes can be found in GM3 FCL.735.A.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

ED Decision 2017/022/R is associated with the Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course - aeroplanes.

* Aviation.Bot's Suggestion - Always consult the original regulation for confirmation

EASA Logo

GM3 FCL.735.A Multi-crew cooperation (MCC) training course – aeroplanes

ED Decision 2017/022/R

EXAMPLE OF AN ENHANCED MCC TRAINING TO AIRLINE PILOT STANDARDS (APS MCC) GRADING SYSTEM

EXAMPLE OF AN APS MCC GRADING SYSTEM

Competency

Unsatisfactory

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

Exemplary

General description of each competency level.

The pilot’s performance in this competency was unsatisfactory with a negative effect on safety.

The pilot did not demonstrate the majority of the relevant performance indicators.

The pilot’s performance in this competency was satisfactory with a slightly positive effect on safety.

The pilot demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to at least a satisfactory standard.

The pilot’s performance in this competency was effective with a significant contribution to safety.

The pilot consistently demonstrated most of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a good standard.

The pilot’s performance in this competency was very effective, which significantly enhanced safety.

The pilot regularly demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to a very good standard.

The pilot’s performance in this competency was exemplary with an outstanding effect on safety.

The pilot always demonstrated all of the relevant performance indicators in this competency to an exemplary standard.

Notes

 

—          Most: 75 % or greater.

—          Relevant performance indicator: a performance indicator/observable behaviour that is expected to be demonstrated during the assessment.

 

AI for Aviation Professionals

Aviation.Bot is an AI tool that assists you with aviation compliance.