AMC 25.1711 Component identification

• ED Decision 2010/005/R found in: CS-25 Amdt 27 - Large Aeroplanes (Jan 2023)

AMC 25.1711 Component identification; EWIS ED Decision 2010/005/R 1 Paragraph [25.1711](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821470) requires applicants to identify EWIS components using consistent methods that facilitate easy identification of the component, its function, and its design limitations. For EWIS associated with flight-essential functions where specific certification requirements are met by redundancy, identification of the EWIS must also include separation requirements. This paragraph requires that the identifying markings remain legible throughout the expected service life of the EWIS component, and that the method used to identify components have no adverse affect on their performance. 2 Subparagraph [25.1711(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821470) requires a consistent method in EWIS identification to avoid confusion and mistakes during aeroplane manufacturing, modification, and maintenance. Aeroplane manufacturers should develop an EWIS identification method that facilitates easy identification of the systems that any specific EWIS component supports and use that identification method in a consistent manner throughout the aeroplane. This consistent identification method must be used for new type certifications and changes to those designs. 3 Subparagraph 25.1711(b): Certain aeroplane systems are installed with redundancy in order to meet the reliability requirements of [CS 25.1309](#_DxCrossRefBm1709820691) and [25.1709](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821595). For EWIS components associated with these systems, paragraph (b) requires specific identification indicating component part number, function, and separation requirement. This is necessary to prevent modifiers from unintentionally introducing unsafe design or installation features on previously certified aeroplanes when they install new or modified systems. Such identification will aid the designers and installers of the new system by alerting them to the presence of these systems It will allow them to make appropriate design and installation decisions. Component identification will also make those performing maintenance and inspections more aware of what systems are associated with specific EWIS in the areas undergoing maintenance or inspection. 4 Subparagraph 25.1711(c) requires that identifying markings required by [CS 25.1711(a) and (b)](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821470) remain legible throughout the design life of the component. As most wire installations are designed to remain on the aeroplane throughout the aeroplane’s service life, this means the identification marks must be able to be read for the life of the aeroplane. The method of marking must take into account the environment in which the EWIS component will be installed. The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) documents ARP 5607, “Legibility of Print on Aerospace Wire and Cables,” and AS 5942, “Marking of Electrical Insulating Materials,” provides guidance on this subject. 5 Subparagraph 25.1711(d) requires that the means used to identify an EWIS component may not have an adverse effect on component performance throughout its design life. a. Certain wire marking methods have potential to damage wire insulation. Hot-stamp marking is one such method. According to SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) aerospace information report AIR5575, “Hot Stamp Wire Marking Concerns for Aerospace Vehicle Applications,” the hot-stamp marking method is not well suited for today’s generation of thin wall aircraft wiring. As noted in that document, wire insulation has become markedly thinner over the years since the procedure was first introduced in the 1940s. Because of this, problems have arisen over wire damage from excessive penetration by the hot stamp process. The document further states: “The frequent need for adjustments in temperature, pressure, and swell time inherent to achieving legible hot stamp wire marking provides many opportunities for error. The controls, methods, and guidance necessary to achieve satisfactory performance with hot stamp marking are often not made available to operators in smaller wire maintenance facilities.” In addition it should be established from the wire manufacturer that hot stamp printing is or is not suitable for the particular wire. b. If damage to the insulation occurs during the marking process, it may fail later in service after exposure to the sometimes-harsh environmental conditions of aircraft use. While [CS 25.1711](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821470) does not prohibit use of hot-stamp marking, its use is discouraged. To comply with this paragraph, if the hot-stamp marking process is used, the guidelines of SAE recommended practice ARP5369, “Guidelines for Wire Identification Marking Using the Hot Stamp Process” or equivalent should be followed. c. In some cases it may not be practicable to mark an EWIS component directly because of component size or identification requirements. In this case other methods of identification such as a label or sleeve should be used. 6 CS 25.1711(e) requires that EWIS modifications to the type design maintain consistency with the identification scheme of the original type design. It requires that EWIS modifications to the type design take into consideration the identification scheme of the original type design. This is to ensure that the consistency required by [CS 25.1711(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821470) is maintained when a modification is installed. The intent of this requirement is to provide continuity for EWIS identification on a particular model. It is not the intent of the requirement to impose on the modifier the exact wire identification methods of the aeroplane manufacturer. However, since the purpose of [CS 25.1711](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821470) is to make it easy to identify those aeroplane systems essential to the safe operation of the aeroplane, it is in the best interest of safety that designers of any modifications to the original design consider the approved type design identification methods. For example it would not be appropriate for a modifier to use purple wire to identify a specific flight critical system when the approved type design used the colour green, especially if the type design already uses purple wire to identify non-essential systems. Such a scheme could cause confusion and lead future modifiers or maintainers to believe that the routing of purple wires with green wires (and thus critical systems with non-essential systems) is acceptable. The paragraph does not prescribe a particular method for identification but is meant to ensure that consistent identification is maintained throughout the life of the aeroplane. 7 [CS 25.981(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821428) states that "...Visible means of identifying critical features of the design must be placed in areas of the aeroplane where foreseeable maintenance, actions, repairs, or alterations may compromise the critical design configuration control limitations (e.g., colour-coding of wire to identify separation limitation). These visible means must also be identified as CDCCL " The design approval holder should define a method of ensuring that this essential information will: — be communicated by statements in appropriate manuals, such as wiring diagram manuals, and — be evident to those who may perform and approve such repairs and alterations. An example of a critical design configuration control limitation that would result in a requirement for visible identification means would be a requirement to maintain wire separation between FQIS (fuel quantity indication system) wiring and other electrical circuits that could introduce unsafe levels of energy into the FQIS wires. Acceptable means of providing visible identification means for this limitation would include colour-coding of the wiring or, for retrofit, placement of identification tabs at specific intervals along the wiring. 8 Types of EWIS component identification. There are at least four types of EWIS component identification, which are accomplished at different stages. They are listed and described below. a. Component manufacturer part number. EWIS components should be identified by their manufacturer in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization document ISO 2574, “Aircraft – Electrical Cables – Identification Marking,” or similar specifications. This identification comprises product part number, manufacturer identification, and, when possible or specifically required, batch identification or year of manufacture. This helps ensure: — Identification and traceability of the component. — Verification of compliance with the aircraft certification basis. — Accuracy in manufacture, maintenance, quality control, storage and delivery. — Verification of the use of approved/qualified sourcing. — Monitoring of the aircraft configuration during the aircraft life. (1) EWIS component manufacturer identification. It is common practice to use the five-digit/letter C.A.G.E. code (Government and Commercial Entity Code), for manufacturer identification, particularly for wires. Alternatively, for small components whose size may make it difficult to use other forms of clear identification, a logo may be used. (2) Identification intervals. Wires and cables should be identified at intervals of not more than 38 cm (15 inches). This interval is different than the interval used by airframe manufacturers to prevent the possibility of two identifications overlapping over the entire length of the run, which could render both identifications illegible. (3) Types of wire manufacturer markings. Wire manufacturer markings should generally be green to differentiate them from the black marking typically used by the aeroplane manufacturer, but other contrasting colours are also acceptable. The preferred marking process is the “ink transfer” or “ink jet” type, with post curing to increase resistance to mechanical or chemical wear. As stated above, hot stamp marking method has the potential to damage wire insulation and its use is discouraged. (4) The component technical specification should include methods used for identification and legibility during the design life of the component. b. Airframe manufacturer component function identification number. In addition to the type identification imprinted by the original wire manufacturer, aircraft wire should also contain a unique circuit identification coding that is accomplished at time of harness assembly. This allows existing installed wire to be identified as to its performance capabilities when considering replacement. Inadvertent use of a lower performance and unsuitable replacement wire can thus be avoided. Identification of EWIS components by the airframe manufacturer helps ensure: — Identification and inspection of cable runs. — Accuracy of manufacture, maintenance, quality control, storage and delivery. — Verification of the system to which the component belongs. — Identification of components related to systems required for safe flight, landing, or egress or that have the potential to impact the flight crew’s ability to cope with adverse operating conditions. Identification of EWIS components should clearly correspond to aircraft wiring manuals. c. Airframe manufacturer routing identification and modification. Electrical drawings should describe wire routings through the entire aeroplane (for example: incompatibility between routes, minimum distance between routes, absolute ban of combining bundles) and be available in the maintenance documentation as required by [Appendix H](#_DxCrossRefBm1709821855) to CS 25. This information ensures that modification designers and maintenance personnel are aware of the defined physical segregation of the different routes of the aircraft model they are working on. Coding for identification of routes or bundles used on aircraft should be displayed by adequate means such as labels, tags, placards, coloured ties, bar-codes. This type of component identification helps ensure: — Identification and inspection of bundles. — Accuracy of manufacture, maintenance, quality control, storage and delivery. — Determination of the type of route, or route function, (feeder power, radio etc.). — Clear identification of systems that require physical segregation (i.e. to detect the possible mix of different routes/bundles, the misrouting of a system in an area, etc). — Identification of routes taken by systems that are required for safe flight, landing, egress, or have the potential to impact the ability of the flight crew to cope with adverse operating conditions. (1) Means used for this identification should be appropriate for the component type. The identification process used should not cause degradation of the characteristics of any of the wire cables or other EWIS components in the harness. (2) Modification and repairs identification, in a form that helps ensure the original aeroplane manufacturer’s identification scheme, should be maintained throughout the service life of the aeroplane. (3) Wires and cables should be identified at intervals of preferably not more than 46 cm (18 inches) and should not obscure the identification markings of the EWIS component manufacturer or airframe manufacturer component function identification number. This identification interval is different than the interval used by wire manufacturers to prevent the possibility of two identifications overlapping over the entire length of the run, which could render both identifications illegible. Also, exceptions can be made for short runs of wires or cables or when the majority of the wire or cable is installed in a manner that facilitates easy reading of the identification markings d. Identification of user EWIS modification or repair – (operator’s identification coding). Repairs or modifications to EWIS should follow the identification guidance given in the above paragraphs for aeroplane manufacturers. This helps ensure that the original aeroplane manufacturer’s identification scheme is not compromised by future modifications or repairs and is maintained throughout the service life of the aeroplane. [Amdt 25/5] [Amdt 25/9]