AMC M.A.901(b) Aircraft airworthiness review

• ED Decision 2015/029/R found in: Continuing Airworthiness (1321/2014) Part-M Part-145 Part-66 Part-147 Part-T Part-ML Part-CAMO Part-CAO (Jul 2024)

AMC M.A.901(b) Aircraft airworthiness review ED Decision 2016/011/R 1. If the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft is not managed according to an Appendix I Continuing airworthiness contract, the aircraft should be considered to be outside a controlled environment. Nevertheless, such contract is not necessary when the operator and the CAMO are the same organisation. 2. The fact that limited pilot-owner maintenance as defined in [M.A.803(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544871) is not carried out and released by an approved maintenance organisation does not change the status of an aircraft in a controlled environment providing the CAMO under contract has been informed of any such maintenance carried out. ##### AMC M.A.901(b) Aircraft airworthiness review *ED Decision 2016/011/R* 1. If the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft is not managed according to an Appendix I Continuing airworthiness contract, the aircraft should be considered to be outside a controlled environment. Nevertheless, such contract is not necessary when the operator and the CAMO are the same organisation. 2. The fact that limited pilot-owner maintenance as defined in [M.A.803(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439758) is not carried out and released by an approved maintenance organisation does not change the status of an aircraft in a controlled environment providing the CAMO under contract has been informed of any such maintenance carried out.