Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
ETSO-C210
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-9312
ED Decision 2018/002/R
found in: CS-ETSO Amdt 17 - European Technical Standard Orders (Oct 2026)
Version
CS-ETSO Amdt 17 - ... (Oct 2026)
Section
Share
Version
Show details
Hide details
Version
#### ETSO-C210 *ED Decision 2018/002/R* ##### Airborne Head-Up Display **1 Applicability** This ETSO provides the requirements which airborne head up displays that are designed and manufactured on or after the date of this ETSO must meet in order to be identified with the applicable ETSO marking. This ETSO standard does not address enhanced vision systems (either infrared, millimeter wave or other imaging technologies), displays worn by the pilot (goggles, helmet-mounted displays) or specific symbology to be displayed. **2 Procedures** 2.1 General Applicable procedures are detailed in CS-ETSO, [Subpart A](#_DxCrossRefBm920220672). 2.2 Specific None. **3 Technical Conditions** 3.1 Basic 3.1.1 Minimum Performance Standard Standards set forth in SAE AS8055A, Minimum Performance Standards for Airborne Head Up Display, dated July 2015. Some requirements of SAE AS8055A Section 4 are installation-dependent and cannot be fully verified at TSO article level. When the manufacturer is not able to test the TSO article in conditions representative of the overall range of the intended installation cases: — the installation conditions for which the manufacturer has performed the test should be documented — the installation procedures must define the functional qualification required to ensure the installed performance meets AS8055A. 3.1.2 Environmental Standard See CS-ETSO, Subpart A, paragraph 2.1. 3.1.3 Software See CS-ETSO, Subpart A, paragraph 2.2. 3.1.4 Airborne Electronic Hardware See CS-ETSO, Subpart A, paragraph 2.3. 3.2 Specific None. 3.2.1 Failure Condition Classification See CS-ETSO, Subpart A, paragraph 2.4. The failure condition classification appropriate for the equipment will depend on the intended use of the equipment in a specific aircraft. The loss of function and malfunction failure condition classification for which the equipment is designed should be documented, considering also obstructions to the pilot’s field of view resulting from potential malfunction conditions. **4 Marking** 4.1 General Marking as detailed in CS-ETSO, Subpart A, paragraph 1.2. 4.2 Specific None **5 Availability of Referenced Document** See CS-ETSO, Subpart A, paragraph 3. [Amdt ETSO/13]
Contact support