AMC 66.A.20(b)3 Privileges

• ED Decision 2015/029/R found in: Continuing Airworthiness (1321/2014) Part-M Part-145 Part-66 Part-147 Part-T Part-ML Part-CAMO Part-CAO (Jul 2024)

AMC 66.A.20(b)3 Privileges ED Decision 2015/029/R The wording ‘has the adequate competence to certify maintenance on the corresponding aircraft’ means that the licence holder and, if applicable, the organisation where he/she is contracted/employed, should ensure that he/she has acquired the appropriate knowledge, skills, attitude and experience to release the aircraft being maintained. This is essential because some systems and technology present in the particular aircraft being maintained may not have been covered by the training/examination/experience required to obtain the licence and ratings. This is typically the case, among others, in the following situations: - Type ratings which have been endorsed on a licence in accordance with [Appendix I to AMC to Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544857) ‘List of Type Ratings’ after attending type training/on-the-job training which did not cover all the models/variants included in such rating. For example, a licence endorsed with the rating Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 (CFM56) after attending type training/on-the-job training covering only the Airbus 320 (CFM56). - Type ratings which have been endorsed on a licence in accordance with [Appendix I to AMC to Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544857) ‘List of Type Ratings’ after a new variant has been added to the rating in Appendix I, without performing difference training. For example, a licence endorsed with the rating Boeing 737-600/700/800/900 for a person who already had the rating Boeing 737-600/700/800, without performing any difference training for the 737-900. - Work being carried out on a model/variant for which the technical design and maintenance techniques have significantly evolved from the original model used in the type training/on-the-job training. - Specific technology and options selected by each customer which may not have been covered by the type training/on-the-job training. - Changes in the basic knowledge requirements of [Appendix I to Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1518545649) not requiring re-examination of existing licence holders (grandfathered privileges). - The endorsement of group/subgroup ratings based on experience on a representative number of tasks/aircraft or based on type training/examination on a representative number of aircraft. - Persons meeting the requirements of 6 months of experience every 2 years only on certain similar aircraft types as allowed by [AMC 66.A.20(b)2](#_DxCrossRefBm1518545424). - Persons holding a [Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544900) licence with limitations, obtained through conversion of national qualifications ([66.A.70](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544868)), where such limitations are going to be lifted after performing the corresponding basic knowledge examinations. In this case, the type ratings endorsed in the licence may have been obtained in the national system without covering all the aircraft systems (because of the previous limitations) and there will be a need to assess and, if applicable, to train this person on the missing systems. Additional information is provided in [AMC 145.A.35(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm1518545420). ##### AMC 66.A.20(b)3 Privileges *ED Decision 2015/029/R* The wording *‘has the adequate competence to certify maintenance on the corresponding aircraft’* means that the licence holder and, if applicable, the organisation where he/she is contracted/employed, should ensure that he/she has acquired the appropriate knowledge, skills, attitude and experience to release the aircraft being maintained. This is essential because some systems and technology present in the particular aircraft being maintained may not have been covered by the training/examination/experience required to obtain the licence and ratings. This is typically the case, among others, in the following situations: - Type ratings which have been endorsed on a licence in accordance with [Appendix I to AMC to Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439744) ‘List of Type Ratings’ after attending type training/on-the-job training which did not cover all the models/variants included in such rating. For example, a licence endorsed with the rating Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 (CFM56) after attending type training/on-the-job training covering only the Airbus 320 (CFM56). - Type ratings which have been endorsed on a licence in accordance with [Appendix I to AMC to Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439744) ‘List of Type Ratings’ after a new variant has been added to the rating in Appendix I, without performing difference training. For example, a licence endorsed with the rating Boeing 737-600/700/800/900 for a person who already had the rating Boeing 737-600/700/800, without performing any difference training for the 737-900. - Work being carried out on a model/variant for which the technical design and maintenance techniques have significantly evolved from the original model used in the type training/on-the-job training. - Specific technology and options selected by each customer which may not have been covered by the type training/on-the-job training. - Changes in the basic knowledge requirements of [Appendix I to Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1203440536) not requiring re-examination of existing licence holders (grandfathered privileges). - The endorsement of group/subgroup ratings based on experience on a representative number of tasks/aircraft or based on type training/examination on a representative number of aircraft. - Persons meeting the requirements of 6 months of experience every 2 years only on certain similar aircraft types as allowed by [AMC 66.A.20(b)2](#_DxCrossRefBm1203440311). - Persons holding a [Part-66](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439787) licence with limitations, obtained through conversion of national qualifications ([66.A.70](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439755)), where such limitations are going to be lifted after performing the corresponding basic knowledge examinations. In this case, the type ratings endorsed in the licence may have been obtained in the national system without covering all the aircraft systems (because of the previous limitations) and there will be a need to assess and, if applicable, to train this person on the missing systems. Additional information is provided in [AMC 145.A.35(a)](#_DxCrossRefBm1203440307).