GM No 1 to 21.A.101(g) Establishment of the operational suitability data (OSD) certification basis for changes to type certificates (TCs)

• ED Decision 2019/018/R found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) Part-21 Part-21L (Jul 2024)

GM No 1 to 21.A.101(g) Establishment of the operational suitability data (OSD) certification basis for changes to type certificates (TCs) ED Decision 2019/018/R This GM provides guidance on the application of point [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096998)(g) in order to determine the applicable OSD certification basis in accordance with points [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096998)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) for major changes to the OSD of type-certified aircraft. 1.       Minor changes Minor changes to the OSD are automatically outside the scope of point [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096998). See GM 21.A.95 for their certification basis. 2.       Major changes a.       If the design change that triggered the change to the OSD constituent is classified as non-significant, the change to the OSD constituent is also non-significant. b.       If the design change that triggered the change to the OSD constituent is classified as significant, the change to the OSD constituent should comply with the latest amendment of the applicable CSs, unless the exceptions of [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096998)(b)(3) apply or unless the OSD change can be classified as minor as per [21.A.91](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096897). The guidance of [GM 21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649097047) Section 3.10 regarding the exceptions ‘impractical’ and ‘not contributing materially to the level of safety’, can be applied by analogy and as far as it is applicable to OSD changes. c.       Stand-alone changes to an OSD constituent are considered to be non-significant. d.       When a new OSD constituent is added or required to be added, it should comply with the latest amendment of the applicable CSs. e.       Reserved. f.       Reserved. g.       Point [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096998)(c) provides an exception from the requirements of [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096998)(a) for a change to the OSD of certain aircraft below a specified maximum weight. If an applicant applies for a change to the OSD for an aircraft (other than rotorcraft) of 2 722 kg (6 000 lbs) or less maximum weight, or for a non-turbine-powered rotorcraft of 1 361 kg (3 000 lbs) or less maximum weight, the applicant can demonstrate that the changed OSD complies with the OSD certification basis incorporated by reference in the TC. The applicant can also elect to comply, or may be required to comply, with a later amendment. See also Chapter 4 Section 4.1 ([GM 21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm1649097047)) for specific guidance on this requirement. Note: Refer to [GM No 1 to 21.A.15(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096986) for the applicability of the OSD to other-than-complex motor-powered aircraft. ##### GM No 1 to 21.A.101(g) Establishment of the operational suitability data (OSD) certification basis for changes to type certificates (TCs) *ED Decision 2019/018/R* This GM provides guidance on the application of point [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230489)(g) in order to determine the applicable OSD certification basis in accordance with points [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230489)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) for major changes to the OSD of type-certified aircraft. 1. Minor changes Minor changes to the OSD are automatically outside the scope of point [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230489). See GM 21.A.95 for their certification basis. 2. Major changes a. If the design change that triggered the change to the OSD constituent is classified as non-significant, the change to the OSD constituent is also non-significant. b. If the design change that triggered the change to the OSD constituent is classified as significant, the change to the OSD constituent should comply with the latest amendment of the applicable CSs, unless the exceptions of [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230489)(b)(3) apply or unless the OSD change can be classified as minor as per [21.A.91](#_DxCrossRefBm485230388). The guidance of [GM 21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230538) Section 3.10 regarding the exceptions ‘impractical’ and ‘not contributing materially to the level of safety’, can be applied by analogy and as far as it is applicable to OSD changes. c. Stand-alone changes to an OSD constituent are considered to be non-significant. d. When a new OSD constituent is added or required to be added, it should comply with the latest amendment of the applicable CSs. e. Reserved. f. Reserved. g. Point [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230489)(c) provides an exception from the requirements of [21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230489)(a) for a change to the OSD of certain aircraft below a specified maximum weight. If an applicant applies for a change to the OSD for an aircraft (other than rotorcraft) of 2 722 kg (6 000 lbs) or less maximum weight, or for a non-turbine-powered rotorcraft of 1 361 kg (3 000 lbs) or less maximum weight, the applicant can demonstrate that the changed OSD complies with the OSD certification basis incorporated by reference in the TC. The applicant can also elect to comply, or may be required to comply, with a later amendment. See also Chapter 4 Section 4.1 ([GM 21.A.101](#_DxCrossRefBm485230538)) for specific guidance on this requirement. Note: Refer to [GM No 1 to 21.A.15(d)](#_DxCrossRefBm485230477) for the applicability of the OSD to other-than-complex motor-powered aircraft.