GM 21.A.435(a) Classification of repair designs

• ED Decision 2012/020/R found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) Part-21 Part-21L (Jul 2024)
• ED Decision 2025/016/R found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) (Nov 2025)

GM 21.A.435(a) Classification of repairs ED Decision 2012/020/R 1.       Clarification of the terms Major/Minor In line with the definitions given in [21.A.91](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096897), a new repair is classified as 'major' if the result on the approved type design has an appreciable effect on structural performance, weight, balance, systems, operational characteristics or other characteristics affecting the airworthiness of the product, part or appliance. In particular, a repair is classified as major if it needs extensive static, fatigue and damage tolerance strength justification and/or testing in its own right, or if it needs methods, techniques or practices that are unusual (i.e., unusual material selection, heat treatment, material processes, jigging diagrams, etc.) Repairs that require a re-assessment and re-evaluation of the original certification substantiation data to ensure that the aircraft still complies with all the relevant requirements, are to be considered as major repairs. Repairs whose effects are considered minor and require minimal or no assessment of the original certification substantiation data to ensure that the aircraft still complies with all the relevant requirements, are to be considered ‘minor’. It is understood that not all the certification substantiation data will be available to those persons/organisations classifying repairs. A qualitative judgement of the effects of the repair will therefore be acceptable for the initial classification. The subsequent review of the design of the repair may lead to it being re-classified, owing to early judgements being no longer valid. 2.       Airworthiness concerns for Major/Minor classification The following should be considered for the significance of their effect when classifying repairs. Should the effect be considered to be significant then the repair should be classified 'Major'. The repair may be classified as 'Minor' where the effect is known to be without appreciable consequence. i)        Structural performance Structural performance of the product includes static strength, fatigue, damage tolerance, flutter and stiffness characteristics. Repairs to any element of the structure should be assessed for their effect upon the structural performance. ii)       Weight and balance          The weight of the repair may have a greater effect upon smaller aircraft as opposed to larger aircraft. The effects to be considered are related to overall aircraft centre of gravity and aircraft load distribution. Control surfaces are particularly sensitive to the changes due to the effect upon the stiffness, mass distribution and surface profile which may have an effect upon flutter characteristics and controllability. iii)      Systems          Repairs to any elements of a system should be assessed for the effect intended on the operation of the complete system and for the effect on system redundancy. The consequence of a structural repair on an adjacent or remote system should also be considered as above, (for example: airframe repair in area of a static port). iv)      Operational characteristics Changes may include: —    stall characteristics —    handling —    performance and drag —    vibration v)       Other characteristics —    changes to load path and load sharing —    change to noise and emissions —    fire protection / resistance Note: Considerations for classifying repairs 'Major/Minor' should not be limited to those listed above. 3.       Examples of 'Major' repairs i)        A repair that requires a permanent additional inspection to the approved maintenance programme, necessary to ensure the continued airworthiness of the product. Temporary repairs for which specific inspections are required prior to installation of a permanent repair do not necessarily need to be classified as 'Major'. Also, inspections and changes to inspection frequencies not required as part of the approval to ensure continued airworthiness do not cause classification as 'Major' of the associated repair. ii)       A repair to life limited or critical parts. iii)      A repair that introduces a change to the Aircraft Flight Manual. ##### GM 21.A.435(a) Classification of repair designs *ED Decision 2025/016/R* 1. Clarification of the terms ‘major’/‘minor’ In line with the definitions given in [21.A.91](#_DxCrossRefBm485230388), a new repair is classified as 'major' if the result on the approved type design has an appreciable effect on structural performance, weight, balance, systems, operational characteristics, certified noise or emissions levels, other characteristics affecting the airworthiness of the product, part or appliance, or other characteristics affecting the environmental compatibility of the product. In particular, a repair is classified as major if it needs extensive static, fatigue and damage tolerance strength justification and/or testing in its own right, or if it needs methods, techniques or practices that are unusual (i.e., unusual material selection, heat treatment, material processes, jigging diagrams, etc.). Repairs that require a re-assessment and re-evaluation of the original certification substantiation data to ensure that the aircraft still complies with all the relevant requirements, are to be considered as major repairs. Repairs whose effects are considered minor and require minimal or no assessment of the original certification substantiation data to ensure that the aircraft still complies with all the relevant requirements, are to be considered ‘minor’. It is understood that not all the certification substantiation data will be available to those persons/organisations classifying repairs. A qualitative judgement of the effects of the repair will therefore be acceptable for the initial classification. The subsequent review of the design of the repair may lead to it being re-classified, owing to early judgements being no longer valid. 2. Airworthiness concerns for major/minor classification The following should be considered for the significance of their effect when classifying repairs. Should the effect be considered to be significant, the repair should be then classified 'major'. The repair may be classified as 'minor' where the effect is known to be without appreciable consequence. i) Structural performance Structural performance of the product includes static strength, fatigue, damage tolerance, flutter and stiffness characteristics. Repairs to any element of the structure should be assessed for their effect upon the structural performance. ii) Weight and balance The weight of the repair may have a greater effect upon smaller aircraft as opposed to larger aircraft. The effects to be considered are related to overall aircraft centre of gravity and aircraft load distribution. Control surfaces are particularly sensitive to the changes due to the effect upon the stiffness, mass distribution and surface profile which may have an effect upon flutter characteristics and controllability. iii) Systems Repairs to any elements of a system should be assessed for the effect intended on the operation of the complete system and for the effect on system redundancy. The consequence of a structural repair on an adjacent or remote system should also be considered as above, (for example: airframe repair in area of a static port). iv) Operational characteristics Changes may include: — stall characteristics — handling — performance and drag — vibration v) Other characteristics — changes to load path and load sharing — fire protection / resistance Note: Considerations for classifying repairs major/minor should not be limited to those listed above. 3. Examples of major repairs i) A repair that requires a permanent additional inspection to the approved maintenance programme, necessary to ensure the continued airworthiness of the product. Temporary repairs for which specific inspections are required prior to installation of a permanent repair do not necessarily need to be classified as major. Also, inspections and changes to inspection frequencies not required as part of the approval to ensure continued airworthiness do not cause classification as major of the associated repair. ii) A repair to life limited or critical parts. iii) A repair that introduces a change to the Aircraft Flight Manual.