Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM1 21.A.249 Transferability
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-3899
ED Decision 2023/014/R
found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) Part-21 Part-21L (Jul 2024)
From
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
From section
To
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM1 21.A.249 Transferability ED Decision 2023/014/R GENERAL 1. Transfer of the approval would normally only be agreed in cases where the organisation itself remains substantially unchanged. 2. An acceptable transfer situation could be for example a change of company name (supported by the appropriate certificate from the National Companies Registration Office or equivalent) but with no changes to site address or senior company manager. However, if the same legal entity were to relocate to new premises with a new senior company manager and/or new departmental heads, then a substantial investigation by EASA would be necessary such that the change would be classified as a re-approval. 3. In the event of receivership there may be good technical justification for continuation of the approval provided that the company continues to function in a satisfactory manner. It is likely that at a later stage the approval might be surrendered by the receiver or transferred to another legal entity in which case the former paragraphs apply.
##### GM1 21.A.249 Transferability *ED Decision 2023/014/R* **GENERAL** 1. Transfer of the approval would normally only be agreed in cases where the organisation itself remains substantially unchanged. 2. An acceptable transfer situation could be for example a change of company name (supported by the appropriate certificate from the National Companies Registration Office or equivalent) but with no changes to site address or senior company manager. However, if the same legal entity were to relocate to new premises with a new senior company manager and/or new departmental heads, then a substantial investigation by EASA would be necessary such that the change would be classified as a re-approval. 3. In the event of receivership there may be good technical justification for continuation of the approval provided that the company continues to function in a satisfactory manner. It is likely that at a later stage the approval might be surrendered by the receiver or transferred to another legal entity in which case the former paragraphs apply.