Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM1 21.A.239(d)(3) Design management system
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-3881
ED Decision 2022/021/R
found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) Part-21 Part-21L (Jul 2024)
From
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
From section
To
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM1 21.A.239(d)(3) Design management system ED Decision 2022/021/R DESIGN ASSURANCE ELEMENT — PARTNERS AND SUBCONTRACTORS In meeting the requirements of point [21.A.239(d)(3)](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096880), the applicant for a design organisation approval under Subpart J may adopt the following policy: (a) The satisfactory integration of the partner and subcontractor and applicant’s design assurance systems is demonstrated for the activities that are covered under the applicant’s terms of approval. (b) In the event that a partner and subcontractor holds a design organisation approval (DOA), then in accordance with point [21.A.239(d)(3)](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096880), the applicant may take this into account in demonstrating the effectiveness of that integrated system. (c) When any partner and subcontractor does not hold a DOA, then the applicant will need to establish to its own satisfaction and the satisfaction of EASA, the adequacy of that partner’s/subcontractor’s design assurance system in accordance with point [21.A.243(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm1649097316).
##### GM1 21.A.239(d)(3) Design management system *ED Decision 2022/021/R* **DESIGN ASSURANCE ELEMENT — PARTNERS AND SUBCONTRACTORS** In meeting the requirements of point [21.A.239(d)(3)](#_DxCrossRefBm485230370), the applicant for a design organisation approval under Subpart J may adopt the following policy: (a) The satisfactory integration of the partner and subcontractor and applicant’s design assurance systems is demonstrated for the activities that are covered under the applicant’s terms of approval. (b) In the event that a partner and subcontractor holds a design organisation approval (DOA), then in accordance with point [21.A.239(d)(3)](#_DxCrossRefBm485230370), the applicant may take this into account in demonstrating the effectiveness of that integrated system. (c) When any partner and subcontractor does not hold a DOA, then the applicant will need to establish to its own satisfaction and the satisfaction of EASA, the adequacy of that partner’s/subcontractor’s design assurance system in accordance with point [21.A.243(b)](#_DxCrossRefBm485230808).