Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC 145.A.50(b) Certification of maintenance
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-357
ED Decision 2023/013/R
found in: Continuing Airworthiness (1321/2014) Part-M Part-145 Part-66 Part-147 Part-T Part-ML Part-CAMO Part-CAO (Jul 2024)
From
Continuing Airwort... (Sep 2025)
Continuing Airwort... (Jul 2024)
From section
To
Continuing Airwort... (Sep 2025)
Continuing Airwort... (Jul 2024)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC 145.A.50(b) Certification of maintenance ED Decision 2023/013/R 1. The certificate of release to service should contain the following statement: ‘Certifies that the work specified, except as otherwise specified, was carried out in accordance with [Part-145](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544883) and in respect to that work the aircraft/aircraft component is considered ready for release to service’. Reference should also be made to the EASA [Part-145](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544883) approval number and the identity of the person who issued the release. 2. It is acceptable to use an alternate abbreviated certificate of release to service consisting of the following statement ‘[Part-145](#_DxCrossRefBm1518544883) release to service’ instead of the full certification statement specified in paragraph 1. When the alternate abbreviated certificate of release to service is used, the introductory section of the technical log should include an example of the full certification statement from paragraph 1. 3. The certificate of release to service should relate to the task specified in the instructions issued by the (S)TC holder or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance or operator or in the aircraft maintenance programme which itself may cross-refer to maintenance data. 4. The date such maintenance was carried out should include when the maintenance took place relative to any life or overhaul limitation in terms of date/flying hours/cycles/landings etc., as appropriate. 5. When extensive maintenance has been carried out, it is acceptable for the certificate of release to service to summarise the maintenance as long as there is a unique cross-reference to the work package containing full details of maintenance carried out. Dimensional information should be retained in the work-pack record.
##### AMC 145.A.50(b) Certification of maintenance *ED Decision 2023/013/R* 1. The certificate of release to service should contain the following statement: ‘Certifies that the work specified, except as otherwise specified, was carried out in accordance with [Part-145](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439770) and in respect to that work the aircraft/aircraft component is considered ready for release to service’. Reference should also be made to the EASA [Part-145](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439770) approval number and the identity of the person who issued the release. 2. It is acceptable to use an alternate abbreviated certificate of release to service consisting of the following statement ‘[Part-145](#_DxCrossRefBm1203439770) release to service’ instead of the full certification statement specified in paragraph 1. When the alternate abbreviated certificate of release to service is used, the introductory section of the technical log should include an example of the full certification statement from paragraph 1. 3. The certificate of release to service should relate to the task specified in the instructions issued by the (S)TC holder or the declarant of a declaration of design compliance or operator or in the aircraft maintenance programme which itself may cross-refer to maintenance data. 4. The date such maintenance was carried out should include when the maintenance took place relative to any life or overhaul limitation in terms of date/flying hours/cycles/landings etc., as appropriate. 5. When extensive maintenance has been carried out, it is acceptable for the certificate of release to service to summarise the maintenance as long as there is a unique cross-reference to the work package containing full details of maintenance carried out. Dimensional information should be retained in the work-pack record.