Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC4 ATM/ANS.OR.C.005(a)(2) Safety support assessment and assurance of changes to the functional system
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-3249
ED Decision 2017/001/R
found in: ATM/ANS Provision of Services (2017/373) (Mar 2025)
From
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC4 ATM/ANS.OR.C.005(a)(2) Safety support assessment and assurance of changes to the functional system ED Decision 2017/001/R DETERMINATION OF THE OPERATIONAL CONTEXT FOR THE CHANGE (a) When determining the operational context for the change, service providers other than an air traffic services provider should ensure that: (1) the specification of the operational context can be shown to be true for all circumstances and environments in which the changed service is intended to operate; (2) the operational context is completely and coherently specified; and (3) the specification of the operational context is internally consistent. (b) The operational context must be specified so that its adherence to (a)(1) and (a)(2) is observable and measurable either directly or indirectly with a degree of certainty commensurate with the level of confidence sought from assurance.
AMC4 ATM/ANS.OR.C.005(a)(2) Safety support assessment and assurance of changes to the functional system ED Decision 2017/001/R DETERMINATION OF THE OPERATIONAL CONTEXT FOR THE CHANGE (a) When determining the operational context for the change, service providers other than an air traffic services provider should ensure that: (1) the specification of the operational context can be shown to be true for all circumstances and environments in which the changed service is intended to operate; (2) the operational context is completely and coherently specified; and (3) the specification of the operational context is internally consistent. (b) The operational context must be specified so that its adherence to (a)(1) and (a)(2) is observable and measurable either directly or indirectly with a degree of certainty commensurate with the level of confidence sought from assurance.