GM1 ADR.OPS.C.010(b)(2) Pavements, other ground surfaces and drainage

• ED Decision 2021/003/R found in: Aerodromes (139/2014) Part-ADR.AR Part-ADR.OR Part-ADR.OPS CS-ADR-DSN CS-HPT-DSN (Dec 2024)

GM1 ADR.OPS.C.010(b)(2) Pavements, other ground surfaces and drainage ED Decision 2021/003/R RUNWAY SURFACE EVENNESS (a) The operation of aircraft and differential settlement of surface foundations will eventually lead to increases in surface irregularities. Small deviations in the above tolerances will not seriously hamper aircraft operations. In general, isolated irregularities of the order of 2.5 cm to 3 cm over a 45 m-distance are acceptable, as shown in Figure 1. Although maximum acceptable deviations vary with the type and speed of an aircraft, the limits of acceptable surface irregularities can be estimated to a reasonable extent. The following table describes acceptable, tolerable and excessive limits: <table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="567"><tr><td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="193"><p></p><p><b>Surface Irregularity</b></p></td><td colspan="9" valign="top" width="374"><p align="center"><b>Length of irregularity (m)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td width="42"><p>3</p></td><td width="42"><p>6</p></td><td width="42"><p>9</p></td><td width="42"><p>12</p></td><td width="42"><p>15</p></td><td width="42"><p>20</p></td><td width="42"><p>30</p></td><td width="42"><p>45</p></td><td width="42"><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="193"><p><b>Acceptable surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p></td><td width="42"><p>2.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>3.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>4.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>5</p></td><td width="42"><p>5.4</p></td><td width="42"><p>5.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>6.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>8.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="193"><p><b>Tolerable surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p></td><td width="42"><p>3.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>5.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>6.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>7.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>8.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>9.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>11</p></td><td width="42"><p>13.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="193"><p><b>Excessive surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p></td><td width="42"><p>5.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>7.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>9.1</p></td><td width="42"><p>10</p></td><td width="42"><p>10.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>11.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>13.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>17</p></td><td width="42"><p>20</p></td></tr></table> Table 1 (1) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the acceptable limit curve but are less than the heights defined by the tolerable limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the tolerable region, then maintenance action should be planned. The runway may remain in service. This region is the start of possible passenger and pilot discomfort. (2) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the tolerable limit curve, but are less than the heights defined by the excessive limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the excessive region, the maintenance corrective action is mandatory to restore the condition to the acceptable region. The runway may remain in service but should be repaired within a reasonable period. This region could lead to the risk of possible aircraft structural damage due to a single event or fatigue failure over time. (3) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the excessive limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the unacceptable region, then the area of the runway where the roughness has been identified warrants closure. Repairs are required to restore the condition within the acceptable limit region and the aircraft operators may be advised accordingly. This region runs the extreme risk of a structural failure and must be addressed immediately. (b) The term ‘surface irregularity’ is defined herein to mean isolated surface elevation deviations that do not lie along a uniform slope through any given section of a runway. For the purposes of this concern, a ‘section of a runway’ is defined herein to mean a segment of a runway throughout which a continuing general uphill, downhill, or flat slope is prevalent. The length of this section is generally between 30 and 60 m, and can be greater, depending on the longitudinal profile and the condition of the pavement. (c) The maximum tolerable step-type bump, such as that which could exist between adjacent slabs, is simply the bump height corresponding to zero bump length at the upper end of the tolerable region of the roughness criteria of Figure 1. (d) Deformation of the runway with time may also increase the possibility of the formation of water pools. Pools as shallow as approximately 3 mm in depth, particularly if they are located where they are likely to be encountered at high speed by landing aeroplanes, can induce aquaplaning which can then be sustained on a wet runway by a much shallower depth of water. Improved guidance regarding the significant length and depth of pools relative to aquaplaning is the subject of further research. It is, of course, especially necessary to prevent pools from forming whenever there is a possibility that they might become frozen. (e) Macrotexture and microtexture are taken into consideration in order to provide the required surface friction characteristics. This normally requires some form of special surface treatment.  Figure 1 GM1 ADR.OPS.C.010(b)(2) Pavements, other ground surfaces and drainage ED Decision 2021/003/R RUNWAY SURFACE EVENNESS (a) The operation of aircraft and differential settlement of surface foundations will eventually lead to increases in surface irregularities. Small deviations in the above tolerances will not seriously hamper aircraft operations. In general, isolated irregularities of the order of 2.5 cm to 3 cm over a 45 m-distance are acceptable, as shown in Figure 1. Although maximum acceptable deviations vary with the type and speed of an aircraft, the limits of acceptable surface irregularities can be estimated to a reasonable extent. The following table describes acceptable, tolerable and excessive limits: <table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="567"><tr><td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="193"><p></p><p><b>Surface Irregularity</b></p></td><td colspan="9" valign="top" width="374"><p align="center"><b>Length of irregularity (m)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td width="42"><p>3</p></td><td width="42"><p>6</p></td><td width="42"><p>9</p></td><td width="42"><p>12</p></td><td width="42"><p>15</p></td><td width="42"><p>20</p></td><td width="42"><p>30</p></td><td width="42"><p>45</p></td><td width="42"><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="193"><p><b>Acceptable surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p></td><td width="42"><p>2.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>3.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>4.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>5</p></td><td width="42"><p>5.4</p></td><td width="42"><p>5.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>6.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>8.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="193"><p><b>Tolerable surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p></td><td width="42"><p>3.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>5.5</p></td><td width="42"><p>6.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>7.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>8.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>9.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>11</p></td><td width="42"><p>13.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="193"><p><b>Excessive surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p></td><td width="42"><p>5.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>7.6</p></td><td width="42"><p>9.1</p></td><td width="42"><p>10</p></td><td width="42"><p>10.8</p></td><td width="42"><p>11.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>13.9</p></td><td width="42"><p>17</p></td><td width="42"><p>20</p></td></tr></table> Table 1 (1) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the acceptable limit curve but are less than the heights defined by the tolerable limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the tolerable region, then maintenance action should be planned. The runway may remain in service. This region is the start of possible passenger and pilot discomfort. (2) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the tolerable limit curve, but are less than the heights defined by the excessive limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the excessive region, the maintenance corrective action is mandatory to restore the condition to the acceptable region. The runway may remain in service but should be repaired within a reasonable period. This region could lead to the risk of possible aircraft structural damage due to a single event or fatigue failure over time. (3) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the excessive limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the unacceptable region, then the area of the runway where the roughness has been identified warrants closure. Repairs are required to restore the condition within the acceptable limit region and the aircraft operators may be advised accordingly. This region runs the extreme risk of a structural failure and must be addressed immediately. (b) The term ‘surface irregularity’ is defined herein to mean isolated surface elevation deviations that do not lie along a uniform slope through any given section of a runway. For the purposes of this concern, a ‘section of a runway’ is defined herein to mean a segment of a runway throughout which a continuing general uphill, downhill, or flat slope is prevalent. The length of this section is generally between 30 and 60 m, and can be greater, depending on the longitudinal profile and the condition of the pavement. (c) The maximum tolerable step-type bump, such as that which could exist between adjacent slabs, is simply the bump height corresponding to zero bump length at the upper end of the tolerable region of the roughness criteria of Figure 1. (d) Deformation of the runway with time may also increase the possibility of the formation of water pools. Pools as shallow as approximately 3 mm in depth, particularly if they are located where they are likely to be encountered at high speed by landing aeroplanes, can induce aquaplaning which can then be sustained on a wet runway by a much shallower depth of water. Improved guidance regarding the significant length and depth of pools relative to aquaplaning is the subject of further research. It is, of course, especially necessary to prevent pools from forming whenever there is a possibility that they might become frozen. (e) Macrotexture and microtexture are taken into consideration in order to provide the required surface friction characteristics. This normally requires some form of special surface treatment.  Figure 1 ##### GM1 ADR.OPS.C.010(b)(2) Pavements, other ground surfaces and drainage *ED Decision 2021/003/R* **RUNWAY SURFACE EVENNESS** (a) The operation of aircraft and differential settlement of surface foundations will eventually lead to increases in surface irregularities. Small deviations in the above tolerances will not seriously hamper aircraft operations. In general, isolated irregularities of the order of 2.5 cm to 3 cm over a 45 m-distance are acceptable, as shown in Figure 1. Although maximum acceptable deviations vary with the type and speed of an aircraft, the limits of acceptable surface irregularities can be estimated to a reasonable extent. The following table describes acceptable, tolerable and excessive limits: <table bgcolor="#d9d9d9" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0"> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <col/> <tr valign="top"> <td bgcolor="#808080" rowspan="2"><p align="left"> <br/> <br/> </p> <p align="left"> <b>Surface Irregularity</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#808080" colspan="9"><p align="center"> <b>Length of irregularity (m)</b></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 3</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 6</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 9</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 12</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 15</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 20</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 30</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 45</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 60</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#808080" valign="top"><p align="left"> <b>Acceptable surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 2.9</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 3.8</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 4.5</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 5</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 5.4</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 5.9</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 6.5</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 8.5</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 10</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#808080" valign="top"><p align="left"> <b>Tolerable surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 3.9</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 5.5</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 6.8</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 7.8</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 8.6</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 9.6</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 11</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 13.6</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 16</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#808080" valign="top"><p align="left"> <b>Excessive surface irregularity height (cm)</b></p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 5.8</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 7.6</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 9.1</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 10</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 10.8</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 11.9</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 13.9</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 17</p> </td> <td bgcolor="#d9d9d9"><p align="center"> 20</p> </td> </tr> </table> ***Table 1*** (1) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the acceptable limit curve but are less than the heights defined by the tolerable limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the tolerable region, then maintenance action should be planned. The runway may remain in service. This region is the start of possible passenger and pilot discomfort. (2) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the tolerable limit curve, but are less than the heights defined by the excessive limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the excessive region, the maintenance corrective action is mandatory to restore the condition to the acceptable region. The runway may remain in service but should be repaired within a reasonable period. This region could lead to the risk of possible aircraft structural damage due to a single event or fatigue failure over time. (3) If the surface irregularities exceed the heights defined by the excessive limit curve, at the specified minimum acceptable length, herein noted by the unacceptable region, then the area of the runway where the roughness has been identified warrants closure. Repairs are required to restore the condition within the acceptable limit region and the aircraft operators may be advised accordingly. This region runs the extreme risk of a structural failure and must be addressed immediately. (b) The term ‘surface irregularity’ is defined herein to mean isolated surface elevation deviations that do not lie along a uniform slope through any given section of a runway. For the purposes of this concern, a ‘section of a runway’ is defined herein to mean a segment of a runway throughout which a continuing general uphill, downhill, or flat slope is prevalent. The length of this section is generally between 30 and 60 m, and can be greater, depending on the longitudinal profile and the condition of the pavement. (c) The maximum tolerable step-type bump, such as that which could exist between adjacent slabs, is simply the bump height corresponding to zero bump length at the upper end of the tolerable region of the roughness criteria of Figure 1. (d) Deformation of the runway with time may also increase the possibility of the formation of water pools. Pools as shallow as approximately 3 mm in depth, particularly if they are located where they are likely to be encountered at high speed by landing aeroplanes, can induce aquaplaning which can then be sustained on a wet runway by a much shallower depth of water. Improved guidance regarding the significant length and depth of pools relative to aquaplaning is the subject of further research. It is, of course, especially necessary to prevent pools from forming whenever there is a possibility that they might become frozen. (e) Macrotexture and microtexture are taken into consideration in order to provide the required surface friction characteristics. This normally requires some form of special surface treatment.  ***Figure 1***