Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC1 21L.B.144(d)
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-22199
ED Decision 2023/013/R
found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) Part-21 Part-21L (Jul 2024)
From
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
From section
To
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC1 21L.B.144(d);(e) and 21L.B.184(d);(e) Oversight programme ED Decision 2023/013/R EXTENSION OF THE OVERSIGHT PLANNING CYCLE BEYOND 24 MONTHS (a) Part 21 Light Subparts G and J do not include requirements for the implementation of a safety management system. However, a declared production organisation or a declared design organisation may decide to introduce certain elements of a safety management system as defined in Part 21 points [21.A.139](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096881) and [21.A.239](#_DxCrossRefBm1649096880) (e.g. safety risk management, safety performance monitoring and measurement). When such elements are voluntarily introduced, the competent authority may consider them to substantiate an extension of the oversight planning cycle beyond 24 months, as specified in points [21L.B.144](#_DxCrossRefBm1649098175)(d) and (e) and in points [21L.B.184](#_DxCrossRefBm1649098279)(d) and (e). (b) If the competent authority applies an extended oversight planning cycle (i.e. that exceeds 24 months), it should perform, at a minimum, one annual review (see AMC1 21L.B.144 and point [21L.B.184](#_DxCrossRefBm1649098279) ‘Oversight programme’) to validate the oversight programme. (c) If the results of the annual review indicate a decrease in the safety performance of the organisation, the competent authority should revert to a 24-month (or shorter) oversight planning cycle and review the oversight programme accordingly.
##### AMC1 21L.B.144(d);(e) and 21L.B.184(d);(e) Oversight programme *ED Decision 2023/013/R* **EXTENSION OF THE OVERSIGHT PLANNING CYCLE BEYOND 24 MONTHS** (a) Part 21 Light Subparts G and J do not include requirements for the implementation of a safety management system. However, a declared production organisation or a declared design organisation may decide to introduce certain elements of a safety management system as defined in Part 21 points [21.A.139](#_DxCrossRefBm485230371) and [21.A.239](#_DxCrossRefBm485230370) (e.g. safety risk management, safety performance monitoring and measurement). When such elements are voluntarily introduced, the competent authority may consider them to substantiate an extension of the oversight planning cycle beyond 24 months, as specified in points [21L.B.144](#_DxCrossRefBm485231672)(d) and (e) and in points [21L.B.184](#_DxCrossRefBm485231776)(d) and (e). (b) If the competent authority applies an extended oversight planning cycle (i.e. that exceeds 24 months), it should perform, at a minimum, one annual review (see AMC1 21L.B.144 and point [21L.B.184](#_DxCrossRefBm485231776) ‘Oversight programme’) to validate the oversight programme. (c) If the results of the annual review indicate a decrease in the safety performance of the organisation, the competent authority should revert to a 24-month (or shorter) oversight planning cycle and review the oversight programme accordingly.