Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM2 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-21115
ED Decision 2023/007/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM2 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations ED Decision 2023/007/R TAKE-OFF AND LANDING PERFORMANCE — HEMS OPERATING SITES USED FOR TRAINING AND CHECKING The operator’s risk assessment required under [CAT.POL.H.305(b)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm927678852) may take into consideration the following elements pertaining to take-off and landing performance when defining such HEMS operating sites, for the purpose of compliance with [SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3)(ii)](#_DxCrossRefBm927677642): (a) altitude; (b) direction of the approach to the operating site; (c) prevalent winds; (d) site weather conditions and operating limitations; (e) whether there are safe forced landing options, the helicopter has flyaway capability, or none of these; (f) performance margins regarding hover out of ground effect (HOGE) capability, considering the expected average temperature for exercise; (g) any defined escape routes during operations; (h) the maximum number of people on board during manoeuvres in addition to the flight crew and technical crew members.
GM2 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations ED Decision 2023/007/R TAKE-OFF AND LANDING PERFORMANCE — HEMS OPERATING SITES USED FOR TRAINING AND CHECKING The operator’s risk assessment required under [CAT.POL.H.305(b)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm318086472) may take into consideration the following elements pertaining to take-off and landing performance when defining such HEMS operating sites, for the purpose of compliance with [SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3)(ii)](#_DxCrossRefBm318085278): (a) altitude; (b) direction of the approach to the operating site; (c) prevalent winds; (d) site weather conditions and operating limitations; (e) whether there are safe forced landing options, the helicopter has flyaway capability, or none of these; (f) performance margins regarding hover out of ground effect (HOGE) capability, considering the expected average temperature for exercise; (g) any defined escape routes during operations; (h) the maximum number of people on board during manoeuvres in addition to the flight crew and technical crew members. *[applicable from 25 May 2024 — ED Decision 2023/007/R]*
##### GM2 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations *ED Decision 2023/007/R* **TAKE-OFF AND LANDING PERFORMANCE — HEMS OPERATING SITES USED FOR TRAINING AND CHECKING** The operator’s risk assessment required under [CAT.POL.H.305(b)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm523088408) may take into consideration the following elements pertaining to take-off and landing performance when defining such HEMS operating sites, for the purpose of compliance with [SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3)(ii)](#_DxCrossRefBm523087151): (a) altitude; (b) direction of the approach to the operating site; (c) prevalent winds; (d) site weather conditions and operating limitations; (e) whether there are safe forced landing options, the helicopter has flyaway capability, or none of these; (f) performance margins regarding hover out of ground effect (HOGE) capability, considering the expected average temperature for exercise; (g) any defined escape routes during operations; (h) the maximum number of people on board during manoeuvres in addition to the flight crew and technical crew members.