Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC1 29.1301 Function and installation
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-20383
ED Decision 2023/001/R
found in: CS-29 Amdt 11 - Large Rotercraft (Feb 2023)
From
CS-29 Amdt 12 - La... (Mar 2026)
CS-29 Amdt 11 - La... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
CS-29 Amdt 12 - La... (Mar 2026)
CS-29 Amdt 11 - La... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC1 29.1301 Function and installation ED Decision 2023/001/R This AMC replaces FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.1301 and should be used when showing compliance with [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332095). (a) Explanation It should be emphasised that [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332095) applies to each item of installed equipment which includes optional equipment as well as required equipment. (b) Procedures (1) Information regarding installation limitations and proper functioning is normally available from the equipment manufacturers in their installation and operation manuals. In addition, some other paragraphs in FAA AC 29-2C include criteria for evaluating proper functioning of particular systems — an example is § AC 29 MG 1 for avionics equipment. (2) [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332095) is quite specific in that it applies to each item of installed equipment. It should be emphasised, however, that even though a general rule as [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332095) is relevant, a rule that gives specific functional requirements for a particular system will prevail over a general rule. Therefore, if a rule exists that defines specific system functioning requirements, its provisions should be used to evaluate the acceptability of the installed system and not the provisions of this general rule. It should also be understood that an interpretation of a general rule should not be used to lessen or increase the requirements of a specific rule. [CS 29.1309](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332097) is another example of a general rule, and this discussion is appropriate when applying its provisions. (3) If optional equipment is installed, the crew may be expected to use it. This may be the case of navigation capabilities (as, for instance, LPV capability) installed on VFR rotorcraft. Therefore, the applicant should define the optional equipment and demonstrate that it complies with [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332095) for its intended function. In addition, the applicant should ensure that the optional equipment does not interfere with the other systems that are required for safe operation of the rotorcraft and that its failure modes are acceptable and do not create any hazards. [Amdt No: 29/11]
##### AMC1 29.1301 Function and installation *ED Decision 2023/001/R* This AMC replaces FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.1301 and should be used when showing compliance with [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772560). (a) Explanation It should be emphasised that [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772560) applies to each item of installed equipment which includes optional equipment as well as required equipment. (b) Procedures (1) Information regarding installation limitations and proper functioning is normally available from the equipment manufacturers in their installation and operation manuals. In addition, some other paragraphs in FAA AC 29-2C include criteria for evaluating proper functioning of particular systems — an example is § AC 29 MG 1 for avionics equipment. (2) [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772560) is quite specific in that it applies to each item of installed equipment. It should be emphasised, however, that even though a general rule as [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772560) is relevant, a rule that gives specific functional requirements for a particular system will prevail over a general rule. Therefore, if a rule exists that defines specific system functioning requirements, its provisions should be used to evaluate the acceptability of the installed system and not the provisions of this general rule. It should also be understood that an interpretation of a general rule should not be used to lessen or increase the requirements of a specific rule. [CS 29.1309](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772562) is another example of a general rule, and this discussion is appropriate when applying its provisions. (3) If optional equipment is installed, the crew may be expected to use it. This may be the case of navigation capabilities (as, for instance, LPV capability) installed on VFR rotorcraft. Therefore, the applicant should define the optional equipment and demonstrate that it complies with [CS 29.1301](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772560) for its intended function. In addition, the applicant should ensure that the optional equipment does not interfere with the other systems that are required for safe operation of the rotorcraft and that its failure modes are acceptable and do not create any hazards. [Amdt No: 29/11]