AMC1 29.965 Fuel tank tests

• ED Decision 2023/001/R found in: CS-29 Amdt 11 - Large Rotercraft (Feb 2023)

AMC1 29.965 Fuel tank tests ED Decision 2023/001/R This AMC supplements FAA AC 29.965. (a) Tests to be performed [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021) (a), (b) and (c) deal with the fuel tank pressure testing as follows: — Sub-paragraph (a) prescribes general testing conditions. — Sub-paragraph (b) prescribes testing conditions for conventional metal tanks, integral tanks and for non-metallic tanks with walls that are not supported by the rotorcraft structure. — Sub-paragraph (c) prescribes pressure testing for non-metallic tanks with walls supported by the rotorcraft structure. [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021)(d) deals with fuel tank vibration & slosh testing with large unsupported or unstiffened flat areas. A clear definition of ‘large unsupported or unstiffened flat area’ is provided in FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.965. The intent of the tests required in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) does not cover the intent of the test required in sub-paragraph (d) and vice versa. Therefore pressure tests, as prescribed under (a), (b) or (c), and the vibration and slosh test, as prescribed under (d), should be performed. (b) Use of MIL-T-6396 AC 29.965 (c)(6) recognises the use of MIL-T-6396 to support the demonstration of compliance with [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021). However, few clarifications are required to appropriately make use of this standard. Combined tests To be in line with the [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021)(d) requirement, the slosh and vibration test conditions shall be simultaneously applied to the test article. Therefore the use of MIL-T-6396 should be restricted to paragraph 4.6.6 ‘Simultaneous Slosh and Vibration test’. Individual/separate performance of paragraph 4.6.7 ‘Vibrations test’ and paragraph 4.6.8 ‘Slosh Test’ of the referenced MIL Specification are not considered to be appropriate. Application of the slosh effect during the test as prescribed in [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021)(d)(5): [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021)(d)(5) prescribes the performance of the vibration test for 25h at 16 to 20 slosh cycles per minute (cpm). MIL-T-6396 proposes two test durations in paragraph 4.6.6: — Option 1: Vibrate for 25h at 16 to 20 slosh cpm, which is identical to the [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1178332021) (d)(5) requirement. or — Option 2: Vibrate for 25h at 10 to 16 slosh cpm with 15 hours of additional test at 10 to 16 slosh cpm. While it is recognised that Option 2 is appropriate in terms of number of cycles to which the test article is finally submitted (extended testing duration to compensate for the reduction of rocking frequency), it potentially omits a major effect introduced by the higher rocking frequency which may induce more severe structural effects due to the fluid dynamics and subsequent shocks. An applicant wishing to use Option 2 should demonstrate by analysis, test or a combination thereof, that the reduction of rocking frequency compared to Option 1 has no positive effect to the test results. [Amdt No: 29/11] ##### AMC1 29.965 Fuel tank tests *ED Decision 2023/001/R* This AMC supplements FAA AC 29.965. (a) Tests to be performed [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486) (a), (b) and (c) deal with the fuel tank pressure testing as follows: — Sub-paragraph (a) prescribes general testing conditions. — Sub-paragraph (b) prescribes testing conditions for conventional metal tanks, integral tanks and for non-metallic tanks with walls that are not supported by the rotorcraft structure. — Sub-paragraph (c) prescribes pressure testing for non-metallic tanks with walls supported by the rotorcraft structure. [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486)(d) deals with fuel tank vibration & slosh testing with large unsupported or unstiffened flat areas. A clear definition of ‘large unsupported or unstiffened flat area’ is provided in FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.965. The intent of the tests required in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) does not cover the intent of the test required in sub-paragraph (d) and vice versa. Therefore pressure tests, as prescribed under (a), (b) or (c), and the vibration and slosh test, as prescribed under (d), should be performed. (b) Use of MIL-T-6396 AC 29.965 (c)(6) recognises the use of MIL-T-6396 to support the demonstration of compliance with [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486). However, few clarifications are required to appropriately make use of this standard. Combined tests To be in line with the [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486)(d) requirement, the slosh and vibration test conditions shall be simultaneously applied to the test article. Therefore the use of MIL-T-6396 should be restricted to paragraph 4.6.6 ‘Simultaneous Slosh and Vibration test’. Individual/separate performance of paragraph 4.6.7 ‘Vibrations test’ and paragraph 4.6.8 ‘Slosh Test’ of the referenced MIL Specification are not considered to be appropriate. Application of the slosh effect during the test as prescribed in [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486)(d)(5): [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486)(d)(5) prescribes the performance of the vibration test for 25h at 16 to 20 slosh cycles per minute (cpm). MIL-T-6396 proposes two test durations in paragraph 4.6.6: — Option 1: Vibrate for 25h at 16 to 20 slosh cpm, which is identical to the [CS 29.965](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772486) (d)(5) requirement. or — Option 2: Vibrate for 25h at 10 to 16 slosh cpm with 15 hours of additional test at 10 to 16 slosh cpm. While it is recognised that Option 2 is appropriate in terms of number of cycles to which the test article is finally submitted (extended testing duration to compensate for the reduction of rocking frequency), it potentially omits a major effect introduced by the higher rocking frequency which may induce more severe structural effects due to the fluid dynamics and subsequent shocks. An applicant wishing to use Option 2 should demonstrate by analysis, test or a combination thereof, that the reduction of rocking frequency compared to Option 1 has no positive effect to the test results. [Amdt No: 29/11]