Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC2 29.307 Proof of structure
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-20360
ED Decision 2023/001/R
found in: CS-29 Amdt 11 - Large Rotercraft (Feb 2023)
From
CS-29 Amdt 12 - La... (Mar 2026)
CS-29 Amdt 11 - La... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
CS-29 Amdt 12 - La... (Mar 2026)
CS-29 Amdt 11 - La... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC2 29.307 Proof of structure ED Decision 2023/001/R FAIRING SUBSTANTIATION This AMC supplements FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.307 and should be used in conjunction with that AC when demonstrating compliance with [CS 29.307](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331785). Further to [CS 29.301](#_DxCrossRefBm1178331782), the specified loads must be distributed appropriately or conservatively and significant changes in the distribution of the loads, as a result of deflection, must be taken into account. FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.307 refers to the need for flight test measurement in the scope of the fatigue and damage tolerance demonstration. The methods used to determine load intensities and distribution should be validated by flight load measurements unless the methods used for determining those loading conditions are shown to be reliable. Each fairing, when appropriate, should be constructed and supported so that it can resist any vibration, inertia, and air load to which it may be subjected in operation. The vibrations level, the inertia and air loads should be validated by appropriately instrumented flight measurements as recommended in FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.307. For the fairings and the associated supporting structure, the loads can be shown unreliably predicted and require a measurement during flight tests. The loads derived from flight testing should be compared with those obtained from analytical methods. Note: AMC No.2 to CS 25.301(b) provides an acceptable means of demonstrating compliance with the provisions of CS-25 related to the validation, by flight measurements, of the methods used for determination of flight load intensities and distributions, for large aeroplanes. The methodology presented in the CS-25 AMC material may be adapted to CS-29, to provide further guidance to this AMC. [Amdt No: 29/11]
##### AMC2 29.307 Proof of structure *ED Decision 2023/001/R* **FAIRING SUBSTANTIATION** This AMC supplements FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.307 and should be used in conjunction with that AC when demonstrating compliance with [CS 29.307](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772250). Further to [CS 29.301](#_DxCrossRefBm1685772247), the specified loads must be distributed appropriately or conservatively and significant changes in the distribution of the loads, as a result of deflection, must be taken into account. FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.307 refers to the need for flight test measurement in the scope of the fatigue and damage tolerance demonstration. The methods used to determine load intensities and distribution should be validated by flight load measurements unless the methods used for determining those loading conditions are shown to be reliable. Each fairing, when appropriate, should be constructed and supported so that it can resist any vibration, inertia, and air load to which it may be subjected in operation. The vibrations level, the inertia and air loads should be validated by appropriately instrumented flight measurements as recommended in FAA AC 29-2C, § AC 29.307. For the fairings and the associated supporting structure, the loads can be shown unreliably predicted and require a measurement during flight tests. The loads derived from flight testing should be compared with those obtained from analytical methods. Note: AMC No.2 to CS 25.301(b) provides an acceptable means of demonstrating compliance with the provisions of CS-25 related to the validation, by flight measurements, of the methods used for determination of flight load intensities and distributions, for large aeroplanes. The methodology presented in the CS-25 AMC material may be adapted to CS-29, to provide further guidance to this AMC. [Amdt No: 29/11]