Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC1 21.A.3A(a)(3), 21.A.3A(b)(3), 21.A.3A(d) Reporting system
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-20290
ED Decision 2022/021/R
found in: Initial Airworthiness and Environmental Protection (748/2012) Part-21 Part-21L (Jul 2024)
From
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
From section
To
Initial Airworthin... (Nov 2025)
Initial Airworthin... (Jul 2024)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC1 21.A.3A(a)(3), 21.A.3A(b)(3), 21.A.3A(d) Reporting system ED Decision 2022/021/R REPORTING TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY Within the overall limit of 72Ā hours, the degree of urgency for submitting a report should be determined by the level of risk that is judged to have resulted from the occurrence. If an occurrence is judged by the organisation that identified the possible unsafe condition to have resulted in an immediate and particularly significant hazard, EASA (or the competent authority of the Member State, as required) should be advised immediately and by the fastest possible means (telephone, fax, email, telex, etc.) of whatever details are available at that time. This initial report must be followed up with a full written report within 72Ā hours. An example would be an uncontained engine failure that results in damage to the aircraft primary structure. In all other cases, the submission of the report may be delayed up to a maximum of 72Ā hours after determining the possible unsafe condition, in order to provide more details.
##### AMC1 21.A.3A(a)(3), 21.A.3A(b)(3), 21.A.3A(d) Reporting system *ED Decision 2022/021/R* **REPORTING TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY** Within the overall limit of 72Ā hours, the degree of urgency for submitting a report should be determined by the level of risk that is judged to have resulted from the occurrence. If an occurrence is judged by the organisation that identified the possible unsafe condition to have resulted in an immediate and particularly significant hazard, EASA (or the competent authority of the Member State, as required) should be advised immediately and by the fastest possible means (telephone, fax, email, telex, etc.) of whatever details are available at that time. This initial report must be followed up with a full written report within 72Ā hours. An example would be an uncontained engine failure that results in damage to the aircraft primary structure. In all other cases, the submission of the report may be delayed up to a maximum of 72Ā hours after determining the possible unsafe condition, in order to provide more details.