Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM1 CAT.POL.A.335(a)(1) Landing -- wet and contaminated runways
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-18809
ED Decision 2021/005/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM1 CAT.POL.A.335(a)(1) Landing — wet and contaminated runways ED Decision 2021/005/R AFM LANDING DISTANCES FOR WET RUNWAYS Specific landing distances provided in the AFM for dispatch on wet runways, unless otherwise indicated, include a safety factor, which renders the application of the 15 % safety factor used in [CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm927678680) not necessary. This implies that the AFM distance may be presented as factored distance. When the AFM distance is not factored, a safety factor of 15 % should be applied. These distances may be longer or shorter than those resulting from CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2), but when provided, they are intended as a replacement of [CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm927678680) and it is mandatory to be used at the time of dispatch.
GM1 CAT.POL.A.335(a)(1) Landing — wet and contaminated runways ED Decision 2021/005/R AFM LANDING DISTANCES FOR WET RUNWAYS Specific landing distances provided in the AFM for dispatch on wet runways, unless otherwise indicated, include a safety factor, which renders the application of the 15 % safety factor used in [CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm318086300) not necessary. This implies that the AFM distance may be presented as factored distance. When the AFM distance is not factored, a safety factor of 15 % should be applied. These distances may be longer or shorter than those resulting from CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2), but when provided, they are intended as a replacement of [CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm318086300) and it is mandatory to be used at the time of dispatch.
##### GM1 CAT.POL.A.335(a)(1) Landing — wet and contaminated runways *ED Decision 2021/005/R* **AFM LANDING DISTANCES FOR WET RUNWAYS** Specific landing distances provided in the AFM for dispatch on wet runways, unless otherwise indicated, include a safety factor, which renders the application of the 15 % safety factor used in [CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm523088236) not necessary. This implies that the AFM distance may be presented as factored distance. When the AFM distance is not factored, a safety factor of 15 % should be applied. These distances may be longer or shorter than those resulting from CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2), but when provided, they are intended as a replacement of [CAT.POL.A.335(a)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm523088236) and it is mandatory to be used at the time of dispatch.