GM1 ORO.FC.231(g) Evidence-based training

• ED Decision 2021/002/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)

GM1 ORO.FC.231(g) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2021/002/R EQUIVALENCY OF APPROACHES RELEVANT TO OPERATIONS — APPROACH CHARACTERISTICS The following may be considered suitable examples for each of the approach characteristics: (a) Design (1) Unusual approach design feature — for example, offset final approach track or steep approach, etc. (2) Unusual runway design feature — for example, non-standard lighting or marking (b) Frequency (1) Infrequently visited airfields — for example, alternate airfields (2) Infrequently flown approaches at commonly visited airfields — for example, circling approach, CAT 2, SA CATI (c) Degraded guidance (1) Degraded internal guidance or aircraft equipment — for example, head-up display (HUD) failure (2) Degraded external guidance or ground equipment — for example, GPS signal failure GM1 ORO.FC.231(g) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2021/002/R EQUIVALENCY OF APPROACHES RELEVANT TO OPERATIONS — APPROACH CHARACTERISTICS The following may be considered suitable examples for each of the approach characteristics: (a) Design (1) Unusual approach design feature — for example, offset final approach track or steep approach, etc. (2) Unusual runway design feature — for example, non-standard lighting or marking (b) Frequency (1) Infrequently visited airfields — for example, alternate airfields (2) Infrequently flown approaches at commonly visited airfields — for example, circling approach, CAT 2, SA CATI (c) Degraded guidance (1) Degraded internal guidance or aircraft equipment — for example, head-up display (HUD) failure (2) Degraded external guidance or ground equipment — for example, GPS signal failure ##### GM1 ORO.FC.231(g) Evidence-based training *ED Decision 2021/002/R* **EQUIVALENCY OF APPROACHES RELEVANT TO OPERATIONS — APPROACH CHARACTERISTICS** The following may be considered suitable examples for each of the approach characteristics: (a) Design (1) Unusual approach design feature — for example, offset final approach track or steep approach, etc. (2) Unusual runway design feature — for example, non-standard lighting or marking (b) Frequency (1) Infrequently visited airfields — for example, alternate airfields (2) Infrequently flown approaches at commonly visited airfields — for example, circling approach, CAT 2, SA CATI (c) Degraded guidance (1) Degraded internal guidance or aircraft equipment — for example, head-up display (HUD) failure (2) Degraded external guidance or ground equipment — for example, GPS signal failure