AMC1 ORO.FC.231(d)(1) Evidence-based training

• ED Decision 2021/002/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)

AMC1 ORO.FC.231(d)(1) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2021/002/R GRADING SYSTEM (a) The grading system should provide quantifiable data for the measurement of the training system performance. (b) The grading scale should be 1 to 5, where: (1) Grade 1 — NOT COMPETENT — determines that the minimum acceptable level of performance was not achieved for the conduct of line operations. An outcome of ADDITIONAL TRAINING REQUIRED and level 2 grading metrics should be recorded. (2) Grade 2 to 5 determine an outcome of COMPETENT for the conduct of line operations. (3) Grade 2 (below the average) determines that the minimum acceptable level was achieved for the conduct of line operations. Additionally, level 2 grading metrics should be recorded. Minimum performance indicates a need for training (e.g. tailored or additional) to elevate performance. It includes: (i) a competency graded continuously with 2 in multiple modules, or (ii) the majority of competencies graded with 2 in a module. (4) Grade 3 is the average. (5) Grade 4 determines that the pilot is above the average. (6) Grade 5 (exemplary) determines that the pilot is above the average and the outcome is enhanced safety, effectiveness and efficiency. (c) The operator should develop further grading guidance to the above points to help the instructors determine the grade of the pilots they assess. AMC1 ORO.FC.231(d)(1) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2021/002/R GRADING SYSTEM (a) The grading system should provide quantifiable data for the measurement of the training system performance. (b) The grading scale should be 1 to 5, where: (1) Grade 1 — NOT COMPETENT — determines that the minimum acceptable level of performance was not achieved for the conduct of line operations. An outcome of ADDITIONAL TRAINING REQUIRED and level 2 grading metrics should be recorded. (2) Grade 2 to 5 determine an outcome of COMPETENT for the conduct of line operations. (3) Grade 2 (below the average) determines that the minimum acceptable level was achieved for the conduct of line operations. Additionally, level 2 grading metrics should be recorded. Minimum performance indicates a need for training (e.g. tailored or additional) to elevate performance. It includes: (i) a competency graded continuously with 2 in multiple modules, or (ii) the majority of competencies graded with 2 in a module. (4) Grade 3 is the average. (5) Grade 4 determines that the pilot is above the average. (6) Grade 5 (exemplary) determines that the pilot is above the average and the outcome is enhanced safety, effectiveness and efficiency. (c) The operator should develop further grading guidance to the above points to help the instructors determine the grade of the pilots they assess. ##### AMC1 ORO.FC.231(d)(1) Evidence-based training *ED Decision 2021/002/R* **GRADING SYSTEM** (a) The grading system should provide quantifiable data for the measurement of the training system performance. (b) The grading scale should be 1 to 5, where: (1) Grade 1 — NOT COMPETENT — determines that the minimum acceptable level of performance was not achieved for the conduct of line operations. An outcome of ADDITIONAL TRAINING REQUIRED and level 2 grading metrics should be recorded. (2) Grade 2 to 5 determine an outcome of COMPETENT for the conduct of line operations. (3) Grade 2 (below the average) determines that the minimum acceptable level was achieved for the conduct of line operations. Additionally, level 2 grading metrics should be recorded. Minimum performance indicates a need for training (e.g. tailored or additional) to elevate performance. It includes: (i) a competency graded continuously with 2 in multiple modules, or (ii) the majority of competencies graded with 2 in a module. (4) Grade 3 is the average. (5) Grade 4 determines that the pilot is above the average. (6) Grade 5 (exemplary) determines that the pilot is above the average and the outcome is enhanced safety, effectiveness and efficiency. (c) The operator should develop further grading guidance to the above points to help the instructors determine the grade of the pilots they assess.