AMC1 ORO.FC.231(c) Evidence-based training

• ED Decision 2022/014/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)

AMC1 ORO.FC.231(c) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2022/014/R TRAINING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE — FEEDBACK PROCESS (a) Feedback process is the continuous process of collecting and analysing assessment and training data from an EBT programme. (b) The feedback process should use defined metrics to collect data in order to: (1) identify trends and ensure corrective action where necessary; (2) identify collective training needs; (3) review, adjust and continuously improve the training programme; (4) further develop the training system; and (5) standardise the instructors (when the standardisation and concordance assurance programme is integrated into the training system performance). (c) The following defined metrics should be collected as a minimum: (1) level 0 grading metrics (competent metrics): data metrics providing the information whether the pilot(s) is (are) competent or not; (2) level 1 grading metrics (competency metrics): quantifiable data from the grading system — numeric grade of the competencies (e.g. 1 to 5); (3) level 2 grading metrics (observable behaviour metrics): the instructors record predetermined OBs during the session; (4) level 3 grading metrics (other metrics): the instructors may record other data (e.g. abstract, specific tasks, actions, questions, etc.). (d) Alternatively, where a system for the measurement of training system performance already exists, the operator may use it and, if necessary, adapt it to meet the demands of EBT. AMC1 ORO.FC.231(c) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2022/014/R TRAINING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE — FEEDBACK PROCESS (a) Feedback process is the continuous process of collecting and analysing assessment and training data from an EBT programme. (b) The feedback process should use defined metrics to collect data in order to: (1) identify trends and ensure corrective action where necessary; (2) identify collective training needs; (3) review, adjust and continuously improve the training programme; (4) further develop the training system; and (5) standardise the instructors (when the standardisation and concordance assurance programme is integrated into the training system performance). (c) The following defined metrics should be collected as a minimum: (1) level 0 grading metrics (competent metrics): data metrics providing the information whether the pilot(s) is (are) competent or not; (2) level 1 grading metrics (competency metrics): quantifiable data from the grading system — numeric grade of the competencies (e.g. 1 to 5); (3) level 2 grading metrics (observable behaviour metrics): the instructors record predetermined OBs during the session; (4) level 3 grading metrics (other metrics): the instructors may record other data (e.g. abstract, specific tasks, actions, questions, etc.). (d) Alternatively, where a system for the measurement of training system performance already exists, the operator may use it and, if necessary, adapt it to meet the demands of EBT. ##### AMC1 ORO.FC.231(c) Evidence-based training *ED Decision 2022/014/R* **TRAINING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE — FEEDBACK PROCESS** (a) Feedback process is the continuous process of collecting and analysing assessment and training data from an EBT programme. (b) The feedback process should use defined metrics to collect data in order to: (1) identify trends and ensure corrective action where necessary; (2) identify collective training needs; (3) review, adjust and continuously improve the training programme; (4) further develop the training system; and (5) standardise the instructors (when the standardisation and concordance assurance programme is integrated into the training system performance). (c) The following defined metrics should be collected as a minimum: (1) level 0 grading metrics (competent metrics): data metrics providing the information whether the pilot(s) is (are) competent or not; (2) level 1 grading metrics (competency metrics): quantifiable data from the grading system — numeric grade of the competencies (e.g. 1 to 5); (3) level 2 grading metrics (observable behaviour metrics): the instructors record predetermined OBs during the session; (4) level 3 grading metrics (other metrics): the instructors may record other data (e.g. abstract, specific tasks, actions, questions, etc.). (d) Alternatively, where a system for the measurement of training system performance already exists, the operator may use it and, if necessary, adapt it to meet the demands of EBT.