Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC1 ORO.FC.231(a)(4) Evidence-based training
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-18361
ED Decision 2021/002/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC1 ORO.FC.231(a)(4) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2021/002/R INSTRUCTOR CONCORDANCE ASSURANCE PROGRAMME (ICAP) (a) The ICAP should be able to identify areas of weak concordance to drive improvement in the quality and validity of the grading system. (b) The ICAP should be adapted to the size and complexity of the instructors’ group and the complexity of the operator’s EBT programme. (c) Complex operators should include an ICAP-specific data analysis, demonstrating: (1) instructor-group assessment homogeneity (agreement); (2) instructor assessment accuracy (alignment). (d) The operator should verify the concordance of the instructors: (1) once every cycle; (2) for a sufficient number of competency-grade combinations. (e) The operator should establish procedures to address those instructors who do not meet the standards required. (f) The operator should maintain a list with the EBT instructors qualified to deliver the EBT programme.
AMC1 ORO.FC.231(a)(4) Evidence-based training ED Decision 2021/002/R INSTRUCTOR CONCORDANCE ASSURANCE PROGRAMME (ICAP) (a) The ICAP should be able to identify areas of weak concordance to drive improvement in the quality and validity of the grading system. (b) The ICAP should be adapted to the size and complexity of the instructors’ group and the complexity of the operator’s EBT programme. (c) Complex operators should include an ICAP-specific data analysis, demonstrating: (1) instructor-group assessment homogeneity (agreement); (2) instructor assessment accuracy (alignment). (d) The operator should verify the concordance of the instructors: (1) once every cycle; (2) for a sufficient number of competency-grade combinations. (e) The operator should establish procedures to address those instructors who do not meet the standards required. (f) The operator should maintain a list with the EBT instructors qualified to deliver the EBT programme.
##### AMC1 ORO.FC.231(a)(4) Evidence-based training *ED Decision 2021/002/R* **INSTRUCTOR CONCORDANCE ASSURANCE PROGRAMME (ICAP)** (a) The ICAP should be able to identify areas of weak concordance to drive improvement in the quality and validity of the grading system. (b) The ICAP should be adapted to the size and complexity of the instructors’ group and the complexity of the operator’s EBT programme. (c) Complex operators should include an ICAP-specific data analysis, demonstrating: (1) instructor-group assessment homogeneity (agreement); (2) instructor assessment accuracy (alignment). (d) The operator should verify the concordance of the instructors: (1) once every cycle; (2) for a sufficient number of competency-grade combinations. (e) The operator should establish procedures to address those instructors who do not meet the standards required. (f) The operator should maintain a list with the EBT instructors qualified to deliver the EBT programme.