AMC1 SFCL.445 FE(S) certificate - Assessment of competence

• ED Decision 2020/004/R found in: Sailplane Rule Book - Part-SAO Part-SFCL CS-22 (Nov 2022)

AMC1 SFCL.445 FE(S) certificate – Assessment of competence ED Decision 2020/004/R (a) GENERAL The competent authority may nominate either one of its inspectors or a senior examiner to assess the competence of applicants for the FE(S) certificate. (b) DEFINITIONS (1) ‘Inspector/senior examiner’: the inspector of the competent authority or the senior examiner who is conducting the examiner competence assessment. (2) ‘Examiner applicant’: the person seeking certification as an examiner. (3) ‘Candidate’: the inspector/senior examiner who, for the purpose of conducting the assessment of competence, plays the role of a person being tested or checked by the examiner applicant. (c) CONDUCT OF THE ASSESSMENT An inspector/senior examiner will observe all examiner applicants conducting a test on a ‘candidate’ in a sailplane for which examiner certificate is sought. Items from the related training course and test or check schedule will be selected by the inspector/senior examiner for examination of the ‘candidate’ by the examiner applicant. Having agreed with the inspector/senior examiner the content of the test, the examiner applicant will be expected to manage the entire test. This will include briefing, the conduct of the flight, assessment and debriefing of the ‘candidate’. The inspector/senior examiner will discuss the assessment with the examiner applicant before the ‘candidate’ is debriefed and informed of the result. (d) BRIEFING THE ‘CANDIDATE’ (1) The ‘candidate’ should be given time and facilities to prepare for the test flight. The briefing should cover the following: (i) the objective of the flight; (ii) licensing checks, as necessary; (iii) freedom for the ‘candidate’ to ask questions; (iv) operating procedures to be followed; (v) weather assessment; (vi) operating capacity of ‘candidate’ and examiner; (vii) aims to be identified by ‘candidate’; (viii) simulated weather assumptions (for example, wind speed and visibility cloud base); (ix) use of screens (if applicable); (x) contents of the exercise to be performed; (xi) agreed speed and handling parameters (e.g. maximum launch speeds); (xii) use of R/T; (xiii) respective roles of ‘candidate’ and examiner (for example, during emergency); and (xiv) administrative procedures (for example, submission of a flight plan). (2) The examiner applicant should maintain the necessary level of communication with the ‘candidate’. The following check details should be followed by the examiner applicant: (i) the need to give the ‘candidate’ precise instructions; (ii) responsibility for the safe conduct of the flight; (iii) intervention by the examiner, when necessary; (iv) use of screens; (v) liaison with ATC (where required) and the need for concise, easily understood intentions; (vi) prompting the ‘candidate’ about required sequence of events (for example, following a launch failure); and (vii) keeping brief, factual and unobtrusive notes. (e) ASSESSMENT The examiner applicant should refer to the flight test tolerances given in the relevant skill test. Attention should be paid to the following points: (1) questions from the ‘candidate’; (2) giving the results of the test and any sections failed; and (3) giving the reasons for failure. (f) DEBRIEFING The examiner applicant should demonstrate to the inspector the ability to conduct a fair, unbiased debriefing of the ‘candidate’ based on identifiable factual items. A balance between friendliness and firmness should be evident. The following points should be discussed with the ‘candidate’, at the applicant’s discretion: (1) advising the candidate on how to avoid or correct mistakes; (2) mentioning any other points of criticism noted; (3) giving any advice considered helpful. (g) RECORDING OR DOCUMENTATION The examiner applicant should demonstrate to the inspector the ability to complete the relevant records correctly. These records may be: (1) the relevant test or check form; (2) the licence entry; and (3) the notification of failure form. (h) DEMONSTRATION OF THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE The examiner applicant should demonstrate to the inspector a satisfactory knowledge of the regulatory requirements associated with the function of an examiner.