Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM2 Article 3(8) Provision of ATM/ANS and design of airspace structures
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-17607
ED Decision 2020/008/R
found in: ATM/ANS Provision of Services (2017/373) (Feb 2023)
From
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM2 Article 3(8) Provision of ATM/ANS and design of airspace structures ED Decision 2020/008/R GENERAL — INTERACTIONS BETWEEN AIRSPACE CHANGE PROCESS AND FLIGHT PROCEDURE DESIGN PROCESS When an airspace change includes the design of a new flight procedure or the modification of an existing flight procedure and the initiator is at the same time the flight procedure design service provider, both processes might run in parallel. When the initiator is a different organisation than the flight procedure design service provider, this flight procedure design process can be regarded as a sub-process of the wider process as depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows the interactions between the airspace change process and the flight procedure design process. Figure 1: Interactions between airspace change process and flight procedure design process ![Aviation.Bot AI suggestion, not from EASA source: [Image caption skipped for debugging]](/static/files/file_gqs63YSDadR/image001.png) [...]
GM2 Article 3(8) Provision of ATM/ANS and design of airspace structures ED Decision 2020/008/R GENERAL — INTERACTIONS BETWEEN AIRSPACE CHANGE PROCESS AND FLIGHT PROCEDURE DESIGN PROCESS When an airspace change includes the design of a new flight procedure or the modification of an existing flight procedure and the initiator is at the same time the flight procedure design service provider, both processes might run in parallel. When the initiator is a different organisation than the flight procedure design service provider, this flight procedure design process can be regarded as a sub-process of the wider process as depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows the interactions between the airspace change process and the flight procedure design process. Figure 1: Interactions between airspace change process and flight procedure design process  [...]