Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM2 to AMC16 ATS.TR.210(a)(3) Operation of air traffic control service
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-17181
ED Decision 2020/008/R
found in: ATM/ANS Provision of Services (2017/373) (Mar 2025)
From
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM2 to AMC16 ATS.TR.210(a)(3) Operation of air traffic control service ED Decision 2020/008/R CANCELLING A TAKE-OFF CLEARANCE FOR DEPARTING AIRCRAFT (a) If a take-off clearance has to be cancelled before the take-off run has commenced, the pilot should be instructed to hold position and to acknowledge the instruction. (b) In certain circumstances, the aerodrome air traffic controller may consider that it is necessary to cancel a take-off clearance after the aircraft has commenced the take-off run. In this event, the pilot should be instructed to stop immediately and to acknowledge the instruction. (c) The cancellation of a take-off clearance after an aircraft has commenced its take-off run should only occur when the aircraft will be in serious and imminent danger should it continue. Air traffic controllers should be aware of the potential for an aircraft to overrun the end of the runway if the take-off is abandoned at a late stage; this is particularly so with large aircraft or those operating close to their performance limit, such as at maximum take-off mass, in high ambient temperatures or when the runway braking action may be adversely affected. Because of this risk, even if a take-off clearance is cancelled, the pilot-in-command may consider it safer to continue the take-off than to attempt to stop the aircraft. (d) Air traffic controllers should also be aware of the possibility that an aircraft that abandons its take-off may suffer overheated brakes or another abnormal situation and should be prepared to declare the appropriate category of emergency or to provide other suitable assistance.
GM2 to AMC16 ATS.TR.210(a)(3) Operation of air traffic control service ED Decision 2020/008/R CANCELLING A TAKE-OFF CLEARANCE FOR DEPARTING AIRCRAFT (a) If a take-off clearance has to be cancelled before the take-off run has commenced, the pilot should be instructed to hold position and to acknowledge the instruction. (b) In certain circumstances, the aerodrome air traffic controller may consider that it is necessary to cancel a take-off clearance after the aircraft has commenced the take-off run. In this event, the pilot should be instructed to stop immediately and to acknowledge the instruction. (c) The cancellation of a take-off clearance after an aircraft has commenced its take-off run should only occur when the aircraft will be in serious and imminent danger should it continue. Air traffic controllers should be aware of the potential for an aircraft to overrun the end of the runway if the take-off is abandoned at a late stage; this is particularly so with large aircraft or those operating close to their performance limit, such as at maximum take-off mass, in high ambient temperatures or when the runway braking action may be adversely affected. Because of this risk, even if a take-off clearance is cancelled, the pilot-in-command may consider it safer to continue the take-off than to attempt to stop the aircraft. (d) Air traffic controllers should also be aware of the possibility that an aircraft that abandons its take-off may suffer overheated brakes or another abnormal situation and should be prepared to declare the appropriate category of emergency or to provide other suitable assistance.