Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC9 ATS.TR.210(a)(3) Operation of air traffic control service
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-17168
ED Decision 2020/008/R
found in: ATM/ANS Provision of Services (2017/373) (Feb 2023)
From
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
From section
To
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Mar 2025)
ATM/ANS Provision ... (Feb 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC9 ATS.TR.210(a)(3) Operation of air traffic control service ED Decision 2020/008/R VISUAL APPROACH (a) Subject to the conditions described in point (b), clearance for an IFR flight to execute a visual approach may be requested by a flight crew or initiated by the air traffic controller. In the latter case, the concurrence of the flight crew should be required. (b) An IFR flight should only be cleared to execute a visual approach, provided the pilot can maintain visual reference to the terrain and: (1) the reported ceiling is at or above the level of the beginning of the initial approach segment for the aircraft so cleared; or (2) the pilot reports at the level of the beginning of the initial approach segment or at any time during the instrument approach procedure that the meteorological conditions are such that with reasonable assurance a visual approach and landing can be completed. (c) Except between aircraft performing successive visual approaches as described in point (d), separation should be provided between an aircraft cleared to execute a visual approach and other arriving and departing aircraft. (d) For successive visual approaches, separation should be maintained by the air traffic controller until the pilot of a succeeding aircraft reports having the preceding aircraft in sight. The aircraft should then be instructed to follow and maintain own separation from the preceding aircraft. (e) In case of aircraft performing successive visual approaches and instructed to maintain own separation as in point (d), and the distance between such aircraft is less than the appropriate wake turbulence minimum, the air traffic controller should issue a caution of possible wake turbulence.
AMC9 ATS.TR.210(a)(3) Operation of air traffic control service ED Decision 2020/008/R VISUAL APPROACH (a) Subject to the conditions described in point (b), clearance for an IFR flight to execute a visual approach may be requested by a flight crew or initiated by the air traffic controller. In the latter case, the concurrence of the flight crew should be required. (b) An IFR flight should only be cleared to execute a visual approach, provided the pilot can maintain visual reference to the terrain and: (1) the reported ceiling is at or above the level of the beginning of the initial approach segment for the aircraft so cleared; or (2) the pilot reports at the level of the beginning of the initial approach segment or at any time during the instrument approach procedure that the meteorological conditions are such that with reasonable assurance a visual approach and landing can be completed. (c) Except between aircraft performing successive visual approaches as described in point (d), separation should be provided between an aircraft cleared to execute a visual approach and other arriving and departing aircraft. (d) For successive visual approaches, separation should be maintained by the air traffic controller until the pilot of a succeeding aircraft reports having the preceding aircraft in sight. The aircraft should then be instructed to follow and maintain own separation from the preceding aircraft. (e) In case of aircraft performing successive visual approaches and instructed to maintain own separation as in point (d), and the distance between such aircraft is less than the appropriate wake turbulence minimum, the air traffic controller should issue a caution of possible wake turbulence.