AMC7 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs)

• ED Decision 2019/008/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)

AMC7 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs) ED Decision 2019/008/R CHART APPLICATIONS The navigation charts that are depicted should contain the information necessary, in an appropriate form, to perform the operation safely. Consideration should be given to the size, resolution and position of the display to ensure legibility whilst retaining the ability to review all the information required to maintain adequate situational awareness. The identification of risks associated with the human–machine interface, as part of the operator’s risk assessment, is key to identifying acceptable mitigation means, e.g.: (a) to establish procedures for reducing the risk of making errors; (b) to control and mitigate the additional workload related to EFB use; (c) to ensure the consistency of colour-coding and symbology philosophies between EFB applications and their compatibility with other flight crew compartment applications; and (d) to consider aspects of crew resource management (CRM) when using an EFB system. In the case of chart application displaying own-ship position in flight, [AMC9 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm927679648) is applicable. AMC7 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs) ED Decision 2019/008/R CHART APPLICATIONS The navigation charts that are depicted should contain the information necessary, in an appropriate form, to perform the operation safely. Consideration should be given to the size, resolution and position of the display to ensure legibility whilst retaining the ability to review all the information required to maintain adequate situational awareness. The identification of risks associated with the human–machine interface, as part of the operator’s risk assessment, is key to identifying acceptable mitigation means, e.g.: (a) to establish procedures for reducing the risk of making errors; (b) to control and mitigate the additional workload related to EFB use; (c) to ensure the consistency of colour-coding and symbology philosophies between EFB applications and their compatibility with other flight crew compartment applications; and (d) to consider aspects of crew resource management (CRM) when using an EFB system. In the case of chart application displaying own-ship position in flight, [AMC9 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm318087256) is applicable. ##### AMC7 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs) *ED Decision 2019/008/R* **CHART APPLICATIONS** The navigation charts that are depicted should contain the information necessary, in an appropriate form, to perform the operation safely. Consideration should be given to the size, resolution and position of the display to ensure legibility whilst retaining the ability to review all the information required to maintain adequate situational awareness. The identification of risks associated with the human–machine interface, as part of the operator’s risk assessment, is key to identifying acceptable mitigation means, e.g.: (a) to establish procedures for reducing the risk of making errors; (b) to control and mitigate the additional workload related to EFB use; (c) to ensure the consistency of colour-coding and symbology philosophies between EFB applications and their compatibility with other flight crew compartment applications; and (d) to consider aspects of crew resource management (CRM) when using an EFB system. In the case of chart application displaying own-ship position in flight, [AMC9 NCC.GEN.131(b)(2)](#_DxCrossRefBm523089248) is applicable.