Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
GM1 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-13166
ED Decision 2023/007/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Sep 2023)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
GM1 SPA.HEMS.125(b)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations ED Decision 2023/007/R [applicable until 24 May 2024 — ED Decision 2012/019/R] GM1 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations ED Decision 2023/007/R *[applicable from 25 May 2024 — ED Decision 2023/007/R]* PERFORMANCE CLASS 2 OPERATIONS AT A HEMS OPERATING SITE As the risk profile at a HEMS operating site is already well known, operations without an assured safe forced landing capability do not need a separate approval and the requirements does not call for the additional risk assessment that is specified in [CAT.POL.H.305(b)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm318086472).
GM1 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations ED Decision 2023/007/R PERFORMANCE CLASS 2 OPERATIONS AT A HEMS OPERATING SITE As the risk profile at a HEMS operating site is already well known, operations without an assured safe forced landing capability do not need a separate approval and the requirements does not call for the additional risk assessment that is specified in [CAT.POL.H.305(b)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm927678852).
##### GM1 SPA.HEMS.125(c)(3) Performance requirements for HEMS operations *ED Decision 2023/007/R* **PERFORMANCE CLASS 2 OPERATIONS AT A HEMS OPERATING SITE** As the risk profile at a HEMS operating site is already well known, operations without an assured safe forced landing capability do not need a separate approval and the requirements does not call for the additional risk assessment that is specified in [CAT.POL.H.305(b)(1)](#_DxCrossRefBm523088408).