Light
Dark
System
Log In
Loading...
Compare / EASA/
Incorporated Amendments
/
Compare & Highlight Differences
AMC2 CAT.OP.MPA.115 Approach flight technique -- aeroplanes
Available versions for ERULES-1963177438-12553
ED Decision 2022/012/R
found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)
From
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
From section
To
Air Operations Rev... (Mar 2026)
Air Operations (96... (Feb 2025)
Air Operations (96... (Sep 2023)
To section
No visible text changes
0 removals
0 additions
View
Rich
Plain
Sync scrolling
Share
From
Show details
Hide details
To
Show details
Hide details
Version
Show side by side
AMC2 CAT.OP.MPA.115 Approach flight technique — aeroplanes ED Decision 2022/012/R APPROACH OPERATIONS USING NPA PROCEDURES FLOWN WITH A FLIGHT TECHNIQUE OTHER THAN THE CDFA (a) In case the CDFA technique is not used, the approach should be flown to an altitude/height at or above the MDA/H where a level flight segment at or above MDA/H may be flown to the MAPt. (b) Even when the approach procedure is flown without the CDFA technique, the relevant procedures for ensuring a controlled and stable path to MDA/H should be followed. (c) In case the CDFA technique is not used when flying an approach, the operator should implement procedures to ensure that early descent to the MDA/H will not result in a subsequent flight below MDA/H without adequate visual reference. These procedures could include: (1) awareness of radio altimeter information with reference to the approach profile; (2) terrain awareness warning system (TAWS); (3) limitation of rate of descent; (4) limitation of the number of repeated approaches; (5) safeguards against too early descents with prolonged flight at MDA/H; and (6) specification of visual requirements for the descent from the MDA/H. (d) In case the CDFA technique is not used and when the MDA/H is high, it may be appropriate to make an early descent to MDA/H with appropriate safeguards such as the application of a significantly higher RVR or VIS. (e) The procedures that are flown with level flight at or above the MDA/H should be listed in the OM. (f) Operators should categorise aerodromes where there are approaches that require level flight at or above MDA/H as B or C. Such aerodrome categorisation will depend upon the operator’s experience, operational exposure, training programme(s) and flight crew qualification(s).
AMC2 CAT.OP.MPA.115 Approach flight technique — aeroplanes ED Decision 2022/012/R APPROACH OPERATIONS USING NPA PROCEDURES FLOWN WITH A FLIGHT TECHNIQUE OTHER THAN THE CDFA (a) In case the CDFA technique is not used, the approach should be flown to an altitude/height at or above the MDA/H where a level flight segment at or above MDA/H may be flown to the MAPt. (b) Even when the approach procedure is flown without the CDFA technique, the relevant procedures for ensuring a controlled and stable path to MDA/H should be followed. (c) In case the CDFA technique is not used when flying an approach, the operator should implement procedures to ensure that early descent to the MDA/H will not result in a subsequent flight below MDA/H without adequate visual reference. These procedures could include: (1) awareness of radio altimeter information with reference to the approach profile; (2) terrain awareness warning system (TAWS); (3) limitation of rate of descent; (4) limitation of the number of repeated approaches; (5) safeguards against too early descents with prolonged flight at MDA/H; and (6) specification of visual requirements for the descent from the MDA/H. (d) In case the CDFA technique is not used and when the MDA/H is high, it may be appropriate to make an early descent to MDA/H with appropriate safeguards such as the application of a significantly higher RVR or VIS. (e) The procedures that are flown with level flight at or above the MDA/H should be listed in the OM. (f) Operators should categorise aerodromes where there are approaches that require level flight at or above MDA/H as B or C. Such aerodrome categorisation will depend upon the operator’s experience, operational exposure, training programme(s) and flight crew qualification(s).
##### AMC2 CAT.OP.MPA.115 Approach flight technique — aeroplanes *ED Decision 2022/012/R* **APPROACH OPERATIONS USING NPA PROCEDURES FLOWN WITH A FLIGHT TECHNIQUE OTHER THAN THE CDFA** (a) In case the CDFA technique is not used, the approach should be flown to an altitude/height at or above the MDA/H where a level flight segment at or above MDA/H may be flown to the MAPt. (b) Even when the approach procedure is flown without the CDFA technique, the relevant procedures for ensuring a controlled and stable path to MDA/H should be followed. (c) In case the CDFA technique is not used when flying an approach, the operator should implement procedures to ensure that early descent to the MDA/H will not result in a subsequent flight below MDA/H without adequate visual reference. These procedures could include: (1) awareness of radio altimeter information with reference to the approach profile; (2) terrain awareness warning system (TAWS); (3) limitation of rate of descent; (4) limitation of the number of repeated approaches; (5) safeguards against too early descents with prolonged flight at MDA/H; and (6) specification of visual requirements for the descent from the MDA/H. (d) In case the CDFA technique is not used and when the MDA/H is high, it may be appropriate to make an early descent to MDA/H with appropriate safeguards such as the application of a significantly higher RVR or VIS. (e) The procedures that are flown with level flight at or above the MDA/H should be listed in the OM. (f) Operators should categorise aerodromes where there are approaches that require level flight at or above MDA/H as B or C. Such aerodrome categorisation will depend upon the operator’s experience, operational exposure, training programme(s) and flight crew qualification(s).