GM1 CAT.GEN.MPA.141(a) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs)

• ED Decision 2019/008/R found in: Air Operations (965/2012) Part-ARO Part-ORO Part-CAT Part-SPA Part-NCC Part-NCO Part-SPO (Feb 2025)

GM1 CAT.GEN.MPA.141(a) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs) ED Decision 2019/008/R VIEWABLE STOWAGE (a) Viewable stowage devices have been involved in several reported incidents worldwide. The following issues should be considered by the operator when assessing the compliance of a viewable stowage device: (1) The EFB or EFB stowage interfering with controls (e.g. side sticks, tillers, PTT switches, etc.); (2) Stowage or EFB cables interfering with the opening of windows; (3) Stowage or EFB cables interfering with the access to oxygen masks; (4) The EFB falling during take-off, cruise, or landing, interfering with flight controls, disengaging the autopilot, or hurting the flight crew; and (5) Suction cups detaching following a loss of pressurisation, adding to the crew’s workload. (b) Guidance on the safety, reliability and usability of different viewable stowage solutions and on the related operating conditions can be found in a study published by the FAA[[76]](#_ftn76). With regard to the specific example of suction cups, the following means of mitigation are recommended: (1) The suction cups and the surface to which they will be attached should be properly cleaned with isopropyl alcohol or aircraft window cleaner prior to attachment of the suction cups; (2) Attachment surfaces should be substantially smooth and flat; (3) Periodic cleaning and reattachment should be performed, as appropriate, for the conditions of the environment in which they are used (dusty, etc.); (4) Suction cups should not be left attached to the aircraft windscreen for long periods of time; (5) Suction cups should be replaced every 6 months at a minimum, and, more often in extreme environments. --- [[76]](#_ftnref76)<http://fsims.faa.gov/wdocs/other/efb%20securing%20solutions%20environmental%20test%20report.pdf> GM1 CAT.GEN.MPA.141(a) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs) ED Decision 2019/008/R VIEWABLE STOWAGE (a) Viewable stowage devices have been involved in several reported incidents worldwide. The following issues should be considered by the operator when assessing the compliance of a viewable stowage device: (1) The EFB or EFB stowage interfering with controls (e.g. side sticks, tillers, PTT switches, etc.); (2) Stowage or EFB cables interfering with the opening of windows; (3) Stowage or EFB cables interfering with the access to oxygen masks; (4) The EFB falling during take-off, cruise, or landing, interfering with flight controls, disengaging the autopilot, or hurting the flight crew; and (5) Suction cups detaching following a loss of pressurisation, adding to the crew’s workload. (b) Guidance on the safety, reliability and usability of different viewable stowage solutions and on the related operating conditions can be found in a study published by the FAA[[73]](#_ftn73). With regard to the specific example of suction cups, the following means of mitigation are recommended: (1) The suction cups and the surface to which they will be attached should be properly cleaned with isopropyl alcohol or aircraft window cleaner prior to attachment of the suction cups; (2) Attachment surfaces should be substantially smooth and flat; (3) Periodic cleaning and reattachment should be performed, as appropriate, for the conditions of the environment in which they are used (dusty, etc.); (4) Suction cups should not be left attached to the aircraft windscreen for long periods of time; (5) Suction cups should be replaced every 6 months at a minimum, and, more often in extreme environments. --- [[73]](#_ftnref73)<http://fsims.faa.gov/wdocs/other/efb%20securing%20solutions%20environmental%20test%20report.pdf> ##### GM1 CAT.GEN.MPA.141(a) Use of electronic flight bags (EFBs) *ED Decision 2019/008/R* **VIEWABLE STOWAGE** (a) Viewable stowage devices have been involved in several reported incidents worldwide. The following issues should be considered by the operator when assessing the compliance of a viewable stowage device: (1) The EFB or EFB stowage interfering with controls (e.g. side sticks, tillers, PTT switches, etc.); (2) Stowage or EFB cables interfering with the opening of windows; (3) Stowage or EFB cables interfering with the access to oxygen masks; (4) The EFB falling during take-off, cruise, or landing, interfering with flight controls, disengaging the autopilot, or hurting the flight crew; and (5) Suction cups detaching following a loss of pressurisation, adding to the crew’s workload. (b) Guidance on the safety, reliability and usability of different viewable stowage solutions and on the related operating conditions can be found in a study published by the FAA[[75]](#_ftn75). With regard to the specific example of suction cups, the following means of mitigation are recommended: (1) The suction cups and the surface to which they will be attached should be properly cleaned with isopropyl alcohol or aircraft window cleaner prior to attachment of the suction cups; (2) Attachment surfaces should be substantially smooth and flat; (3) Periodic cleaning and reattachment should be performed, as appropriate, for the conditions of the environment in which they are used (dusty, etc.); (4) Suction cups should not be left attached to the aircraft windscreen for long periods of time; (5) Suction cups should be replaced every 6 months at a minimum, and, more often in extreme environments. --- [[75]](#_ftnref75) <http://fsims.faa.gov/wdocs/other/efb%20securing%20solutions%20environmental%20test%20report.pdf>